• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间个人防护装备(PPE)和消毒剂对皮肤健康的影响。

The Effect of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and Disinfectants on Skin Health During Covid 19 Pandemia.

机构信息

Famagusta State Hospital, Cyprus.

出版信息

Med Arch. 2021 Oct;75(5):361-365. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.361-365.

DOI:10.5455/medarh.2021.75.361-365
PMID:35169358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8740661/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Based on the available evidence, the COVID-19 virus is transmitted through close contact and droplets, not in the form of airborne transmission (airborne) among humans. People at risk of infection are those who are in close contact with or looking after COVID-19 patients. Preventive and mitigation measures are key in both the healthcare sector and the community. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is mandatory to protect healthcare workers from the new coronavirus, but healthcare workers may have skin damage especially associated with long-term use of PPE.

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose in this study is to forward the effects of PPE and disinfectants on health care workers skin health.

METHODS

From March to May 2020, self-administered face to face questionnaires were distributed to 200 individuals, consisting of healthcare workes who served in the designated departments of tertiary hospitals Famagusta /Cyprus. The questionnaire included questions about the condition of skin damage and the frequency or duration of several infection-prevention measures.

RESULTS

The most common protection equipment were surgery mask (91.5%), gloves (87.5%) and hand sanitizer (52.0%). In addition, 141 (70.5%) individuals stated take a bath/shower frequently as a protection method from COVID and135 (67.5%) individuals stated air conditioning. Most individuals use latex gloves with powder (65.0%) or powder free (62.0%). Mean daily duration of wearing mask was 7.32 ± 4.54 (range 0-24) hours, wearing visor or glasses was 3.16 ± 3.97 (range 0-24) hours, wearing protective apron was 4.20 ± 4.57 (range 0-24) hours and wearing gloves was 5.33 ± 4.03 (range 0-24) hours. Eighty (40.0%) individuals bought personal protective equipment for COVID. Most individuals (73.0%) did not see a COVID patient while 18 (9.0%) individuals sampled from a COVID patient. None of the individuals was COVID positive. Mean stress level was 70.24 ± 23.58 (range 0-100). Most individuals (92.0%) stay at home except working times. Fifty-two (26.0%) individuals had hand dryness (xerosis cutis), 38 (19.0%) individuals had body itching or exanthema, 41 (20.5%) individuals had facial wounds because of mask, visor etc. and 68 (34.0%) individuals had rhinitis. Twenty-nine (14.5%) individuals had treatment because of dermal problems.

CONCLUSION

Atopy, winter season, low humidity frequency of hand washing with detergents / disinfectants can disrupt the hydro-lipid cover of the skin surface and also cause irritation and even the development of contact dermatitis. Two-thirds of healthcare workers wash their hands 10 times a day, but only 22% applied skin protective cream. Also, according to a study, prophylactic dressings have been shown to alleviate pressure injuries associated with the device. Also, longer exposure time is an important risk factor. Latex-free gloves are now a mandatory standard in many hospitals and clinics and have the potential to reduce occupational skin diseases.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c0/8740661/55b4a46d85aa/medarch-75-361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c0/8740661/78e9099ee642/medarch-75-361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c0/8740661/a2b4804344f3/medarch-75-361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c0/8740661/895f3e0301db/medarch-75-361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c0/8740661/55b4a46d85aa/medarch-75-361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c0/8740661/78e9099ee642/medarch-75-361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c0/8740661/a2b4804344f3/medarch-75-361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c0/8740661/895f3e0301db/medarch-75-361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c0/8740661/55b4a46d85aa/medarch-75-361-g004.jpg
摘要

背景

根据现有证据,新冠病毒通过密切接触和飞沫传播,而不是在人与人之间以空气传播(空气传播)的形式传播。有感染风险的人是那些与 COVID-19 患者密切接触或照顾 COVID-19 患者的人。预防和缓解措施是医疗保健部门和社区的关键。个人防护设备(PPE)是保护医护人员免受新型冠状病毒感染的必要手段,但医护人员可能会因长期使用 PPE 而出现皮肤损伤。

目的

本研究的主要目的是探讨 PPE 和消毒剂对医护人员皮肤健康的影响。

方法

2020 年 3 月至 5 月,向 200 名在塞浦路斯法马古斯塔/三大医院指定部门工作的医护人员发放了自我管理的面对面问卷。问卷包括皮肤损伤状况以及几种感染预防措施的频率或持续时间。

结果

最常见的防护设备是手术口罩(91.5%)、手套(87.5%)和洗手液(52.0%)。此外,141 名(70.5%)个人表示经常洗澡/淋浴是预防 COVID 的一种保护方法,135 名(67.5%)个人表示使用空调。大多数人使用乳胶手套,有粉(65.0%)或无粉(62.0%)。每天佩戴口罩的平均时间为 7.32 ± 4.54 小时(范围 0-24 小时),佩戴护目镜或眼镜的平均时间为 3.16 ± 3.97 小时(范围 0-24 小时),佩戴防护围裙的平均时间为 4.20 ± 4.57 小时(范围 0-24 小时),戴手套的平均时间为 5.33 ± 4.03 小时(范围 0-24 小时)。80 名(40.0%)个人购买了个人防护设备以预防 COVID。大多数个人(73.0%)没有看到 COVID 患者,而 18 名(9.0%)个人从 COVID 患者中采样。没有一个人 COVID 检测呈阳性。平均压力水平为 70.24 ± 23.58(范围 0-100)。大多数个人(92.0%)除了工作时间外都呆在家里。52 名(26.0%)个人有手部干燥(皮肤干燥),38 名(19.0%)个人有身体瘙痒或出疹,41 名(20.5%)个人因口罩、护目镜等而面部受伤,68 名(34.0%)个人有鼻炎。29 名(14.5%)个人因皮肤问题接受了治疗。

结论

特应性、冬季、低湿度、频繁使用含清洁剂/消毒剂的水洗手会破坏皮肤表面的水脂覆盖层,还会引起刺激,甚至引发接触性皮炎。三分之二的医护人员每天洗手 10 次,但只有 22%的人使用皮肤保护霜。此外,一项研究表明,预防性敷料已被证明可减轻与设备相关的压力性损伤。此外,暴露时间较长是一个重要的风险因素。现在,许多医院和诊所都强制使用无乳胶手套,这有可能减少职业性皮肤病。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and Disinfectants on Skin Health During Covid 19 Pandemia.新冠疫情期间个人防护装备(PPE)和消毒剂对皮肤健康的影响。
Med Arch. 2021 Oct;75(5):361-365. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.361-365.
2
Personal protective equipment and adverse dermatological reactions among healthcare workers: Survey observations from the COVID-19 pandemic.医护人员的个人防护设备与不良皮肤反应:COVID-19 大流行中的调查观察。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 4;101(9):e29003. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029003.
3
Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco.摩洛哥北部一线 COVID-19 医护人员对个人防护装备的皮肤反应:一项调查。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 Oct 9;65(8):998-1003. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxab018.
4
Does Wearing a Face Mask During the COVID-19 Pandemic Increase the Incidence of Dermatological Conditions in Health Care Workers? Narrative Literature Review.在 COVID-19 大流行期间戴口罩是否会增加医护人员皮肤科疾病的发病率?叙事性文献综述。
JMIR Dermatol. 2021 May 6;4(1):e22789. doi: 10.2196/22789. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun.
5
The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19.医护人员使用新冠病毒病个人防护装备时的皮肤不良反应
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20603. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020603.
6
Real-world assessment, relevance, and problems in use of personal protective equipment in clinical dermatology practice in a COVID referral tertiary hospital.临床皮肤科在 COVID 转诊三级医院中的个人防护设备实际使用情况评估、相关性及存在问题
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Dec;19(12):3189-3198. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13736. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
7
Skin-related problems associated with the use of personal protective equipment among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A online survey study.医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用个人防护设备所引起的皮肤相关问题:一项在线调查研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
8
Survey and enlightenment on the wearing of protective equipment of nurses working on the front line against COVID-19.抗击新冠肺炎疫情一线护士防护用具使用情况的调查与启示
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 14;100(19):e25924. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025924.
9
Skin adverse events related to personal protective equipment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与个人防护装备相关的皮肤不良事件:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Oct;35(10):1994-2006. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17436. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10
Problems Encountered by Nurses Due to the Use of Personal Protective Equipment During the Coronavirus Pandemic: Results of a Survey.冠状病毒大流行期间护士因使用个人防护装备而遇到的问题:一项调查结果
Wound Manag Prev. 2020 Oct;66(10):12-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of headaches in healthcare workers while using personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用个人防护设备时医护人员头痛的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 31;14(5):e074596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074596.
2
Contact dermatitis caused by prevention measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.新冠疫情期间预防措施引发的接触性皮炎:叙述性综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1189190. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1189190. eCollection 2023.
3
Disinfection and decontamination in the context of SARS-CoV-2-specific data.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 pandemic and the skin: what should dermatologists know?COVID-19 大流行与皮肤:皮肤科医生应该了解哪些知识?
Clin Dermatol. 2020 Nov-Dec;38(6):785-787. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
2
Respiratory rehabilitation in elderly patients with COVID-19: A randomized controlled study.老年 COVID-19 患者的呼吸康复:一项随机对照研究。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2020 May;39:101166. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101166. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
Occupational skin disease among health care workers during the coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic.
针对 SARS-CoV-2 特定数据的消毒和除污。
J Med Virol. 2022 Oct;94(10):4654-4668. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27959. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情期间医护人员的职业性皮肤病
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 May;82(5):1085-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Mar 18.