Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, # 101 Daehakno, Jongnogu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Dec;36(6):1703-1709. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00815-3. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
We assessed the accuracy of Masimo O3™ regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO) readings by comparing them with reference values and evaluated the relationship between rSO and somatic tissue oxygen saturation (StO) in children undergoing cardiac surgery. After anesthesia induction, pediatric sensors were applied to the forehead and foot sole, and rSO and StO values were monitored continuously. Before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), FO was set to 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 serially every 15 min. After CPB, FO was reversed. The reference values (SavO) were calculated by combining arterial (SaO) and central venous oxygen saturation (SvO) readings from the arterial and central lines, respectively (0.7 [Formula: see text] SvO + 0.3 [Formula: see text] SaO). In total, 265 pairs of rSO/StO and SavO from 49 patients were analyzed. The bias, standard deviation (SD), standard error (SE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) of rSO were 2.6%, 4.5%, 0.3%, and 4.3%, respectively. The limits of agreement ranged from -6.3% to 11.6%. Trend accuracy analysis yielded a relative mean error of -1.4%, with an SD of 4.3%, SE of 0.2%, and RMSE of 3.9%. According to multiple linear regression analysis, the application of CPB, FO, Hb level, and tip location of the central venous catheter influenced the bias (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, the correlation between rSO and StO was weak (r = 0.254). rSO readings by the Masimo O3™ device and pediatric sensor had good absolute and trending accuracies with respect to the calculated reference values in children undergoing cardiac surgery. rSO and StO cannot be used interchangeably.Clinical trial registration http://clinicaltrials.gov (number: NCT04208906).
我们评估了 Masimo O3™ 区域脑氧饱和度(rSO)读数的准确性,将其与参考值进行比较,并评估了行心脏手术的儿童 rSO 与躯体组织氧饱和度(StO)之间的关系。麻醉诱导后,将儿童传感器应用于前额和足底,并连续监测 rSO 和 StO 值。在体外循环(CPB)前,FO 每隔 15 分钟依次设定为 0.2、0.5 和 0.8。CPB 后,FO 被反转。参考值(SavO)通过分别从动脉和中心静脉线组合动脉(SaO)和中心静脉氧饱和度(SvO)的读数来计算(0.7 [公式:见文本] SvO + 0.3 [公式:见文本] SaO)。共分析了 49 例患者的 265 对 rSO/StO 和 SavO。rSO 的偏差、标准差(SD)、标准误差(SE)和均方根误差(RMSE)分别为 2.6%、4.5%、0.3%和 4.3%。一致性范围为-6.3%至 11.6%。趋势准确性分析得到相对平均误差为-1.4%,SD 为 4.3%,SE 为 0.2%,RMSE 为 3.9%。根据多元线性回归分析,CPB、FO、Hb 水平和中心静脉导管尖端位置的应用影响偏差(均 P<0.05)。此外,rSO 与 StO 之间的相关性较弱(r=0.254)。在接受心脏手术的儿童中,Masimo O3™ 设备和儿科传感器的 rSO 读数与计算出的参考值具有良好的绝对和趋势准确性。rSO 和 StO 不能互换使用。临床试验注册 http://clinicaltrials.gov(编号:NCT04208906)。