Hu Nan, Cheng Haojie, Zhang Kevin, Jensen Randy
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Cancer Inform. 2017 Dec 13;16:1176935117734844. doi: 10.1177/1176935117734844. eCollection 2017.
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Previous studies on GBM biomarkers focused on the effect of the biomarkers on overall survival (OS). Until now, no study has been published that evaluates the performance of biomarkers for prognosing OS. We examined the performance of microRNAs, gene expressions, gene signatures, and methylation that were previously identified to be prognostic. In addition, we investigated whether using clinical risk factors in combination with biomarkers can improve the prognostic performance.
The Cancer Genome Atlas, which provides both biomarkers and OS information, was used in this study. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the prognostic accuracy.
For prognosis of OS by 2 years from diagnosis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of microRNAs, Mir21 and Mir222, was 0.550 and 0.625, respectively. When age was included in the risk prediction score of these biomarkers, the AUC increased to 0.719 and 0.701, respectively. The SAMSN1 gene expression attains an AUC of 0.563, and the "8-gene" signature identified by Bao achieves an AUC of 0.613.
Although some biomarkers are significantly associated with OS, the ability of these biomarkers for prognosing OS events is limited. Incorporating clinical risk factors, such as age, can greatly improve the prognostic performance.
多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是最常见且侵袭性最强的原发性脑肿瘤。以往关于GBM生物标志物的研究主要集中在生物标志物对总生存期(OS)的影响上。到目前为止,尚未发表评估生物标志物对OS进行预后判断性能的研究。我们检测了先前已确定具有预后意义的微小RNA、基因表达、基因特征和甲基化的性能。此外,我们还研究了将临床风险因素与生物标志物联合使用是否能提高预后性能。
本研究使用了提供生物标志物和OS信息的癌症基因组图谱。采用时间依赖性受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来评估预后准确性。
对于诊断后2年的OS预后,微小RNA Mir21和Mir222的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.550和0.625。当将年龄纳入这些生物标志物的风险预测评分时,AUC分别增至0.719和0.701。SAMSN1基因表达的AUC为0.563,Bao鉴定的“8基因”特征的AUC为0.613。
尽管一些生物标志物与OS显著相关,但这些生物标志物对OS事件进行预后判断的能力有限。纳入年龄等临床风险因素可大大提高预后性能。