Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Research Center of Environmental and Non-Communicable Disease, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Mar;24(3):329-338. doi: 10.1111/jch.14412. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
The associations of lean body mass (LBM) with elevated blood pressure (BP) and hypertension were controversial, and the causalities have never been shown. Mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MAMC), an easily obtained anthropometric measurement, could provide an accurate estimate for LBM. Therefore, a prospective cohort study in general Chinese residents aiming to find out the relationship between LBM estimated using MAMC and hypertension risk was performed. Eight thousand one hundred eighty-five eligible participants were included in the baseline analysis, among whom 3442 were subsequently selected into cohort analysis. MAMC was calculated using mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and triceps skinfold thickness (TST). Associations of MAMC with BP values and hypertension prevalence were estimated by linear and logistic regression models. Associations with hypertension incidence were estimated by COX regression models, hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were given. Nonlinear relationship between MAMC and hypertension risk was estimated using restricted cubic spline method. Standardized coefficients of MUAC and TST were compared to estimate their strengths of associations with hypertension. Baseline analysis showed that after adjusted for confounders, the increase of systolic BP per standard deviation (SD) of MAMC were 1.97 mmHg (95%CI: 1.46, 2.48) and 1.63 mmHg (95%CI: 1.10, 2.16) respectively in men and women, and the increases of diastolic BP per SD were 1.58 mmHg (95%CI: 1.23, 1.92) and 1.08 mmHg (95%CI: 0.74, 1.42). Additionally, the association of MAMC with the prevalence of hypertension were also found in both men and women (OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.26, 1.47 in men; OR = 1.33, 95%CI: 1.22, 1.44 in women). Cohort analysis showed that MAMC increased the risk of hypertension (HR = 1.10, 95%CI: 1.01, 1.19 for men; HR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.06, 1.26 for women), and a trend of J-shaped relationship was found. Additionally, the stronger associations of MUAC with both BP values and hypertension than that of TST were found in both baseline and cohort analyses. Findings in our study implied that we cannot neglect the capacity of LBM in predicting hypertension risk, and LBM estimates should be recommended in general health surveys or examinations.
肌肉质量(LBM)与高血压(BP)和高血压之间的关联存在争议,而且因果关系从未得到证实。中上臂肌肉围度(MAMC)是一种易于获得的人体测量指标,可以为 LBM 提供准确的估计。因此,在中国一般居民中进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在探讨使用 MAMC 估计的 LBM 与高血压风险之间的关系。在基线分析中纳入了 8185 名符合条件的参与者,其中 3442 名随后被纳入队列分析。使用中上臂周长(MUAC)和三头肌皮褶厚度(TST)计算 MAMC。线性和逻辑回归模型用于估计 MAMC 与 BP 值和高血压患病率之间的关联。使用 COX 回归模型估计与高血压发病的关联,给出风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。使用限制立方样条法估计 MAMC 与高血压风险之间的非线性关系。比较 MUAC 和 TST 的标准化系数,以估计它们与高血压关联的强度。基线分析表明,在校正混杂因素后,男性和女性的 MAMC 每标准差(SD)的收缩压分别增加 1.97mmHg(95%CI:1.46,2.48)和 1.63mmHg(95%CI:1.10,2.16),舒张压分别增加 1.58mmHg(95%CI:1.23,1.92)和 1.08mmHg(95%CI:0.74,1.42)。此外,男性和女性的 MAMC 与高血压患病率也存在关联(男性 OR=1.36,95%CI:1.26,1.47;女性 OR=1.33,95%CI:1.22,1.44)。队列分析显示,MAMC 增加了高血压的风险(男性 HR=1.10,95%CI:1.01,1.19;女性 HR=1.15,95%CI:1.06,1.26),并且存在 J 形关系的趋势。此外,在基线和队列分析中,MUAC 与 BP 值和高血压的关联均强于 TST。我们的研究结果表明,我们不能忽视 LBM 在预测高血压风险方面的能力,在一般健康调查或检查中应推荐使用 LBM 估计值。