Murray Aja Louise, Nivette Amy, Obsuth Ingrid, Hafetz Mirman Jessica, Mirman Daniel, Ribeaud Denis, Eisner Manuel
Department of Psychology.
Department of Sociology.
Psychol Assess. 2022 May;34(5):409-418. doi: 10.1037/pas0001091. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
Cross-informant discrepancies (CIDs) in youth behavior are common. Given that these same behaviors often show or are perceived to show gender differences, it is important to understand how informant perceptions and their discrepancies are affected by gender. In = 1,048 (51% male) Grade 5 (age 11) Swiss youth, self- versus teacher ( = 261) CIDs were explored using latent difference score (LDS) modeling. CIDs in prosociality (β = -.15) and aggression (β = .14) were predicted by child gender after adjusting for a range of covariates. Males reported more aggression than was attributed to them by teachers whereas females reported less aggression than was attributed to them. Both genders reported more prosociality than was attributed to them, with a larger discrepancy for males. Accounting for gender-related informant differences could help improve assessments used to ascertain whether clinically significant problems are present. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
青少年行为中的信息提供者差异(CIDs)很常见。鉴于这些相同的行为通常表现出或被认为存在性别差异,了解信息提供者的认知及其差异如何受到性别的影响非常重要。在1048名(51%为男性)五年级(11岁)的瑞士青少年中,使用潜在差异分数(LDS)模型探讨了自我与教师(n = 261)之间的CIDs。在调整一系列协变量后,亲社会行为(β = -.15)和攻击行为(β = .14)中的CIDs由儿童性别预测。男性报告的攻击行为比教师归因于他们的更多,而女性报告的攻击行为比教师归因于她们的更少。两种性别报告的亲社会行为都比归因于他们的更多,男性的差异更大。考虑与性别相关的信息提供者差异有助于改进用于确定是否存在具有临床意义问题的评估。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022美国心理学会,保留所有权利)