Suppr超能文献

攻击性行为和亲社会行为中不同信息提供者差异的性别差异:潜在差异分数分析

Gender differences in cross-informant discrepancies in aggressive and prosocial behavior: A latent difference score analysis.

作者信息

Murray Aja Louise, Nivette Amy, Obsuth Ingrid, Hafetz Mirman Jessica, Mirman Daniel, Ribeaud Denis, Eisner Manuel

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Department of Sociology.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2022 May;34(5):409-418. doi: 10.1037/pas0001091. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

Abstract

Cross-informant discrepancies (CIDs) in youth behavior are common. Given that these same behaviors often show or are perceived to show gender differences, it is important to understand how informant perceptions and their discrepancies are affected by gender. In = 1,048 (51% male) Grade 5 (age 11) Swiss youth, self- versus teacher ( = 261) CIDs were explored using latent difference score (LDS) modeling. CIDs in prosociality (β = -.15) and aggression (β = .14) were predicted by child gender after adjusting for a range of covariates. Males reported more aggression than was attributed to them by teachers whereas females reported less aggression than was attributed to them. Both genders reported more prosociality than was attributed to them, with a larger discrepancy for males. Accounting for gender-related informant differences could help improve assessments used to ascertain whether clinically significant problems are present. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

青少年行为中的信息提供者差异(CIDs)很常见。鉴于这些相同的行为通常表现出或被认为存在性别差异,了解信息提供者的认知及其差异如何受到性别的影响非常重要。在1048名(51%为男性)五年级(11岁)的瑞士青少年中,使用潜在差异分数(LDS)模型探讨了自我与教师(n = 261)之间的CIDs。在调整一系列协变量后,亲社会行为(β = -.15)和攻击行为(β = .14)中的CIDs由儿童性别预测。男性报告的攻击行为比教师归因于他们的更多,而女性报告的攻击行为比教师归因于她们的更少。两种性别报告的亲社会行为都比归因于他们的更多,男性的差异更大。考虑与性别相关的信息提供者差异有助于改进用于确定是否存在具有临床意义问题的评估。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验