• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

i-SmartCare 10 分析仪性能评估及六款即时床旁血气分析仪方法比较。

Performance Evaluation of the i-SmartCare 10 Analyzer and Method Comparison of Six Point-of-Care Blood Gas Analyzers.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Lab Med. 2022 Jul 1;42(4):467-472. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.467.

DOI:10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.467
PMID:35177567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8859550/
Abstract

Blood gas, electrolyte, glucose, and lactate level measurement have an immediate and critical impact on patient care. We evaluated the performance of i-SmartCare 10 (i-SENS Inc., Seoul, Korea) and conducted a method comparison study of five point-of-care (POC) analyzers with i-SmartCare 10 as the comparator, according to the CLSI guidelines. Ten analytes (pH, pCO, pO, Na, K, Cl, iCa, glucose, lactate, and Hct) were tested on six analyzers: i-SmartCare 10, ABL90 FLEX PLUS (Radiometer Medical ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark), i-Stat (Abbott Point of Care Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA), RapidLab 1265 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA), Stat Profile pHOx Ultra (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA), and Gem Premier 5000 (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA). The total imprecision and linearity (r>0.99) were excellent, except for a few analytes that narrowly escaped the preset criteria. Interference was noted for Na in the presence of a high K level and for iCa in the presence of high K and Mg levels. Forty of 48 items demonstrated either a proportional or systematic difference in regression analysis; the relative mean difference (%) of 14/48 items escaped the allowable total error in the difference plot analysis. i-SmartCare 10 shows acceptable performance, and using a single POC blood gas analyzer is recommended for monitoring.

摘要

血气、电解质、血糖和乳酸水平的测量对患者的治疗具有直接而关键的影响。我们评估了 i-SmartCare 10(i-SENS Inc.,韩国首尔)的性能,并根据 CLSI 指南对 5 种即时检验(POC)分析仪与 i-SmartCare 10 进行了方法比较研究。在 6 种分析仪上测试了 10 种分析物(pH、pCO、pO、Na、K、Cl、iCa、葡萄糖、乳酸和 Hct):i-SmartCare 10、ABL90 FLEX PLUS(Radiometer Medical ApS,哥本哈根,丹麦)、i-Stat(雅培 POCT 公司,新泽西州普林斯顿)、RapidLab 1265(西门子医疗诊断公司,纽约州塔里敦)、Stat Profile pHOx Ultra(美国新百伦公司,沃尔瑟姆)和 Gem Premier 5000(美国仪器实验室公司,贝德福德)。除了少数分析物勉强符合预设标准外,总不精密度和线性(r>0.99)都非常好。在高钾水平存在的情况下,Na 存在干扰,在高钾和镁水平存在的情况下,iCa 存在干扰。在 48 项中有 40 项显示出回归分析中的比例或系统差异;在差异图分析中,14/48 项的相对平均差异(%)超出了可允许的总误差。i-SmartCare 10 的性能可接受,建议使用单一的即时血气分析仪进行监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea36/8859550/597abfdc2874/alm-42-4-467-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea36/8859550/597abfdc2874/alm-42-4-467-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea36/8859550/597abfdc2874/alm-42-4-467-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance Evaluation of the i-SmartCare 10 Analyzer and Method Comparison of Six Point-of-Care Blood Gas Analyzers.i-SmartCare 10 分析仪性能评估及六款即时床旁血气分析仪方法比较。
Ann Lab Med. 2022 Jul 1;42(4):467-472. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.467.
2
Analytical and pre-analytical performance characteristics of a novel cartridge-type blood gas analyzer for point-of-care and laboratory testing.一种用于即时检测和实验室检测的新型 cartridge 式血气分析仪的分析性能和分析前性能特征。
Clin Biochem. 2018 Mar;53:116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
3
Comparison of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with two different blood gas analyzers and a core laboratory analyzer.使用两种不同的血气分析仪和一台核心实验室分析仪测量的血气、电解质和代谢物结果的比较。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015 Apr;75(2):97-105. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.981854. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
4
A Comparative Assessment of the Nova Stat Profile Prime Plus® Critical Care Analyzer.诺瓦Stat Profile Prime Plus®重症监护分析仪的比较评估
Cureus. 2020 Aug 21;12(8):e9932. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9932.
5
Analytical performance evaluation of the new GEM Premier™ 5000 analyzer in comparison to the GEM Premier™ 4000 and the RapidPoint 405 systems.新 GEM Premier™ 5000 分析仪与 GEM Premier™ 4000 和 RapidPoint 405 系统的分析性能评估。
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Nov;486:313-319. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.019. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
6
Analytical performance evaluation of four cartridge-type blood gas analyzers.四种卡匣式血气分析仪的分析性能评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Feb 1;50(6):1083-91. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2011-0685.
7
Comparison of point-of-care and central laboratory analyzers for blood gas and lactate measurements.床边和中心实验室血气及乳酸分析仪检测结果的比较。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Jun;33(5):e22885. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22885. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
Interchangeability of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with point-of-care, blood gas and core laboratory analyzers.即时检测、血气和中心实验室分析仪测量的血气、电解质和代谢物结果的可互换性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Jul;49(7):1187-91. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.185. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
9
Performance of a multi-profile critical care testing analyzer.多参数重症监护检测分析仪的性能
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(1):9-14. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.003.
10
Comparison of Enterprise Point-of-Care and Nova Biomedical Critical Care Xpress analyzers for determination of arterial pH, blood gas, and electrolyte values in canine and equine blood.企业即时检测分析仪与诺瓦生物医学重症监护快速分析仪用于测定犬马血液中动脉血pH值、血气和电解质值的比较。
Vet Clin Pathol. 2018 Sep;47(3):415-424. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12635. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical performance validation of an integrated cartridge based bedside blood gas analyzer system in the acute care setting.基于一体化检测卡的床边血气分析仪系统在急性护理环境中的临床性能验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06710-6.
2
A passive blood separation sensing platform for point-of-care devices.一种用于即时护理设备的被动血液分离传感平台。
NPJ Biosens. 2025;2(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s44328-025-00038-x. Epub 2025 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Stability of pH, Blood Gas Partial Pressure, Hemoglobin Oxygen Saturation Fraction, and Lactate Concentration.pH 值、血气部分压力、血红蛋白氧饱和度分数和乳酸浓度的稳定性。
Ann Lab Med. 2020 Nov;40(6):448-456. doi: 10.3343/alm.2020.40.6.448. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Comparison of point-of-care and central laboratory analyzers for blood gas and lactate measurements.床边和中心实验室血气及乳酸分析仪检测结果的比较。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Jun;33(5):e22885. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22885. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
3
Comparison of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with two different blood gas analyzers and a core laboratory analyzer.
使用两种不同的血气分析仪和一台核心实验室分析仪测量的血气、电解质和代谢物结果的比较。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015 Apr;75(2):97-105. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.981854. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
4
HbA1c: a review of analytical and clinical aspects.糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c):分析和临床方面的综述。
Ann Lab Med. 2013 Nov;33(6):393-400. doi: 10.3343/alm.2013.33.6.393. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
5
Analytical performance evaluation of four cartridge-type blood gas analyzers.四种卡匣式血气分析仪的分析性能评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Feb 1;50(6):1083-91. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2011-0685.
6
Interchangeability of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with point-of-care, blood gas and core laboratory analyzers.即时检测、血气和中心实验室分析仪测量的血气、电解质和代谢物结果的可互换性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Jul;49(7):1187-91. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.185. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
7
Comparison of 3 different multianalyte point-of-care devices during clinical routine on a medical intensive care unit.在医疗重症监护病房的临床常规中比较 3 种不同的多分析物即时检验设备。
J Crit Care. 2011 Aug;26(4):433.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
8
Evaluation of linearity in the clinical laboratory.临床实验室线性评估。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004 Jan;128(1):44-8. doi: 10.5858/2004-128-44-EOLITC.
9
Point of care testing in the emergency department.急诊科的即时检验
J Emerg Med. 2002 May;22(4):393-404. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(02)00429-8.
10
Point of care testing.即时检验
BMJ. 2001 May 26;322(7297):1285-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1285.