Suppr超能文献

基于血管造影的定量血流比评估脑动脉狭窄的功能:一项初步研究。

Functional Assessment of Cerebral Artery Stenosis by Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Huang Kangmo, Yao Weihe, Du Juan, Wang Fang, Han Yunfei, Chang Yunxiao, Liu Rui, Ye Ruidong, Zhu Wusheng, Tu Shengxian, Liu Xinfeng

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Feb 1;14:813648. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.813648. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing attention has been paid to the hemodynamic evaluation of cerebral arterial stenosis. We aimed to demonstrate the performance of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to assess hemodynamic alterations caused by luminal stenoses, using invasive fractional pressure ratios (FPRs) as a reference standard.

METHODS

Between March 2013 and December 2019, 29 patients undergoing the pressure gradient measurement of cerebral atherosclerosis were retrospectively enrolled. Wire-based FPR was defined by the arterial pressure distal to the stenotic lesion (Pd) to proximal (Pa) pressure ratios (Pd/Pa). FPR < 0.70 or FPR < 0.75 was assumed as hemodynamically significant stenosis. The new method of computing QFR from a single angiographic view, i.e., the Murray law-based QFR, was applied to the interrogated vessel. An artificial intelligence algorithm was developed to realize the automatic delineation of vascular contour.

RESULTS

Fractional pressure ratio and QFR were assessed in 38 vessels from 29 patients. Excellent correlation and agreement were observed between QFR and FPR [ = 0.879, < 0.001; mean difference (bias): -0.006, 95% limits of agreement: -0.198 to 0.209, respectively). Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in QFR were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficients, 0.996 and 0.973, respectively). For predicting FPR < 0.70, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) of QFR was 0.946 (95% CI, 0.820 to 0.993%). The sensitivity and specificity of QFR < 0.70 for identifying FPR < 0.70 was 88.9% (95% CI, 65.3 to 98.6%) and 85.0% (95% CI, 62.1 to 96.8%). For predicting FPR < 0.75, QFR showed similar performance with an AUC equal to 0.926.

CONCLUSION

Computational QFR from a single angiographic view achieved comparable results to the wire-based FPR. The excellent diagnostic performance and repeatability empower QFR with high feasibility in the functional assessment of cerebral arterial stenosis.

摘要

背景

脑动脉狭窄的血流动力学评估日益受到关注。我们旨在以有创的分数压力比(FPR)作为参考标准,展示基于血管造影的定量血流比(QFR)评估管腔狭窄引起的血流动力学改变的性能。

方法

回顾性纳入2013年3月至2019年12月期间29例行脑动脉粥样硬化压力梯度测量的患者。基于导丝的FPR定义为狭窄病变远端动脉压(Pd)与近端动脉压(Pa)之比(Pd/Pa)。FPR<0.70或FPR<0.75被视为血流动力学显著狭窄。将从单一血管造影视图计算QFR的新方法,即基于莫雷定律的QFR,应用于受检血管。开发了一种人工智能算法以实现血管轮廓的自动描绘。

结果

对29例患者的38条血管评估了分数压力比和QFR。QFR与FPR之间观察到极好的相关性和一致性[ = 0.879,<0.001;平均差异(偏差):-0.006,95%一致性界限:分别为-0.198至0.209]。QFR的观察者内和观察者间可靠性极好(组内相关系数分别为0.996和0.973)。对于预测FPR<0.70,QFR的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.946(95%CI,0.820至0.993%)。QFR<0.70识别FPR<0.70的敏感性和特异性分别为88.9%(95%CI,65.3至98.6%)和85.0%(95%CI,62.1至96.8%)。对于预测FPR<0.75,QFR表现出相似性能,AUC等于0.926。

结论

从单一血管造影视图计算的QFR与基于导丝的FPR取得了可比结果。出色的诊断性能和可重复性使QFR在脑动脉狭窄功能评估中具有高度可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da20/8845469/0bae32b1ce5a/fnagi-14-813648-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验