Suppr超能文献

脑脊液生物标志物在当前阿尔茨海默病框架中的优缺点。

Lights and Shadows of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in the Current Alzheimer's Disease Framework.

机构信息

Cognitive Impairment Center, Local Health Authority n. 2 Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy.

Associazione Alzheimer Treviso Onlus, Treviso, Italy.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;86(3):1061-1072. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215432.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The most significant biomarkers that are included in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) research framework are amyloid-β plaques deposition, p-tau, t-tau, and neurodegeneration.Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are included in the most recent AD research criteria, their use is increasing in the routine clinical practice and is applied also to the preclinical phases of AD, including mild cognitive impairment. The role of these biomarkers is still unclear concerning the preclinical stage of AD diagnosis, the CSF methodology, and the costs-benefits of the biomarkers' tests. The controversies regarding the use of biomarkers in the clinical practice are related to the concepts of analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility and to the question of whether they are able to diagnose AD without the support of AD clinical phenotypes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present work is to expose the strengths and weaknesses of the use of CSF biomarkers in the diagnosis of AD in a clinical context.

METHODS

We used PubMed as main source for articles published and the final reference list was generated on the basis of relevance to the topics covered in this work.

RESULTS

The use of CSF biomarkers for AD diagnosis is certainly important but its indication in routine clinical practice, especially for prodromal conditions, needs to be regulated and also contextualized considering the variety of possible clinical AD phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the diagnosis of AD should be understood both as clinical and pathological.

摘要

背景

阿尔茨海默病(AD)研究框架中包含的最重要的生物标志物是淀粉样蛋白-β斑块沉积、p-tau、t-tau 和神经退行性变。尽管脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物已包含在最新的 AD 研究标准中,但它们在常规临床实践中的使用正在增加,并也应用于 AD 的临床前阶段,包括轻度认知障碍。这些生物标志物在 AD 诊断的临床前阶段、CSF 方法学以及生物标志物检测的成本效益方面的作用仍不清楚。关于在临床实践中使用生物标志物的争议涉及分析有效性、临床有效性和临床实用性的概念,以及它们是否能够在没有 AD 临床表型支持的情况下诊断 AD 的问题。

目的

本研究的目的是在临床背景下阐述 CSF 生物标志物在 AD 诊断中的优势和劣势。

方法

我们使用 PubMed 作为主要的文章来源,并根据与本工作涵盖的主题的相关性生成最终的参考文献列表。

结果

CSF 生物标志物在 AD 诊断中的应用固然重要,但在常规临床实践中,尤其是在前驱期,其适应症需要加以规范,并结合可能出现的各种 AD 临床表型加以考虑。

结论

我们建议 AD 的诊断应被理解为临床和病理两方面。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Critical Appraisal of Amyloid Lowering Agents in AD.AD 中淀粉样蛋白降低剂的关键性评价。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Jun 10;21(8):39. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01125-y.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验