Suppr超能文献

阿尔茨海默病的临床诊断:国际工作组的建议。

Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations of the International Working Group.

机构信息

Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Department of Neurology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France; Institut du Cerveau, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Department of Neurology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France; Institut du Cerveau, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Lancet Neurol. 2021 Jun;20(6):484-496. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00066-1. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

Abstract

In 2018, the US National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association proposed a purely biological definition of Alzheimer's disease that relies on biomarkers. Although the intended use of this framework was for research purposes, it has engendered debate and challenges regarding its use in everyday clinical practice. For instance, cognitively unimpaired individuals can have biomarker evidence of both amyloid β and tau pathology but will often not develop clinical manifestations in their lifetime. Furthermore, a positive Alzheimer's disease pattern of biomarkers can be observed in other brain diseases in which Alzheimer's disease pathology is present as a comorbidity. In this Personal View, the International Working Group presents what we consider to be the current limitations of biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and, on the basis of this evidence, we propose recommendations for how biomarkers should and should not be used for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease in a clinical setting. We recommend that Alzheimer's disease diagnosis be restricted to people who have positive biomarkers together with specific Alzheimer's disease phenotypes, whereas biomarker-positive cognitively unimpaired individuals should be considered only at-risk for progression to Alzheimer's disease.

摘要

2018 年,美国国家老龄化研究所和阿尔茨海默病协会提出了一个纯粹基于生物标志物的阿尔茨海默病定义。尽管该框架的预期用途是为了研究目的,但它在日常临床实践中的使用引发了争议和挑战。例如,认知正常的个体可能有淀粉样蛋白β和 tau 病理学的生物标志物证据,但在其一生中通常不会出现临床症状。此外,在其他存在阿尔茨海默病病理学合并症的脑部疾病中,也可以观察到阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的阳性模式。在这篇个人观点中,国际工作组提出了我们认为目前生物标志物在阿尔茨海默病诊断中的局限性,并在此基础上提出了关于生物标志物在临床环境中应如何以及不应如何用于诊断阿尔茨海默病的建议。我们建议将阿尔茨海默病诊断仅限于那些具有阳性生物标志物和特定阿尔茨海默病表型的人,而对于认知正常但生物标志物阳性的个体,仅应考虑其处于向阿尔茨海默病进展的风险中。

相似文献

2
Mini-review: The suspected non-Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology.小型综述:疑似非阿尔茨海默病的病理生理学
Neurosci Lett. 2021 Nov 1;764:136208. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136208. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease.不同方法定义阿尔茨海默病中 AT(N)的意义。
Neurology. 2020 May 26;94(21):e2233-e2244. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009485. Epub 2020 May 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验