Tachiyama G, Sakon M, Kambayashi J, Ohshiro T, Mori T
Thromb Res. 1986 Feb 1;41(3):309-17. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(86)90241-0.
In order to determine which sample preparation, platelet rich plasma (PRP) or platelet poor plasma (PPP), is more suitable for clinical endotoxin assay, we investigated the binding of endotoxins to platelets by comparing the amount of endotoxin in PRP with that in PPP, using a newly developed colorimetric assay with chromogenic substrate (Boc-Leu-Gly-Arg-pNA). When purified endotoxins were added to human whole blood, the amount of endotoxin recovered in PPP was significantly lower than that in PRP for all endotoxins tested except that from E. coli 0111:B4 and their ability to bind to platelets was varied depending on the species of bacteria from which they were purified. However, the amount of endotoxin in PRP obtained from surgical patients (n = 50) was almost same as that in PPP with a correlation coefficient r = 0.95, indicating that natural endotoxins circulating in human blood may not bind to platelets and that PPP can be used for endotoxin assay as well as PRP.
为了确定哪种样本制备方法,即富血小板血浆(PRP)还是乏血小板血浆(PPP),更适合临床内毒素检测,我们通过使用新开发的基于显色底物(Boc-Leu-Gly-Arg-pNA)的比色测定法,比较PRP和PPP中的内毒素含量,研究了内毒素与血小板的结合情况。当将纯化的内毒素添加到人体全血中时,除了来自大肠杆菌O111:B4的内毒素外,在所有测试的内毒素中,PPP中回收的内毒素量均显著低于PRP,并且它们与血小板结合的能力因纯化它们的细菌种类而异。然而,从手术患者(n = 50)获得的PRP中的内毒素量与PPP中的几乎相同,相关系数r = 0.95,这表明人体血液中循环的天然内毒素可能不会与血小板结合,并且PPP可用于内毒素检测,与PRP一样。