• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在等待心脏移植患者中使用 Impella。

Use of Impella in Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation.

机构信息

From the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

Division of Cardiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2022 Jun 1;68(6):786-790. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001679. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000001679
PMID:35184091
Abstract

The new United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy has resulted in a significantly higher number of temporary mechanical circulatory support device usage such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella, and intra-aortic balloon pump due to provision of higher priority with their use while on the waiting list. We aimed to identify Impella use in patients awaiting heart transplantation and temporal changes in its usage. The UNOS database was queried between years 2015 and 2019 for patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years, listed to undergo heart transplantation. A total of 378 patients had Impella support while listed for heart transplantation. Impella use skyrocketed from 2015 (1%) to 2019 (4%, p < 0.01). The most substantial increase in Impella use occurred after the UNOS policy change. The patients listed on Impella support after the policy change had significantly lower waiting time (median 12 days vs. 45 days, p < 0.01). More patients with Impella were directly transplanted (80% vs. 56%, p < 0.01) after the policy change, had significantly lower waitlist mortality (25% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) and fewer converted to a durable support (13% vs. 3%). The translatability (likelihood for receiving organs faster) was significantly improved after the policy change. A multivariable Cox regression model showed that post-transplant survival of Impella patients was not adversely affected after the policy change (hazard ratio = 0.9; p = 0.8). This increase in Impella use represents a substantial change in practice patterns of listing and managing patients on the heart transplant waiting list.

摘要

新的美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)政策导致体外膜肺氧合、Impella 和主动脉内球囊泵等临时机械循环支持设备的使用数量显著增加,因为在等待名单上使用这些设备时提供了更高的优先级。我们旨在确定在等待心脏移植的患者中使用 Impella 的情况及其使用时间的变化。在 2015 年至 2019 年期间,我们在 UNOS 数据库中查询了年龄大于或等于 18 岁、列在接受心脏移植名单上的患者。共有 378 名患者在接受心脏移植时接受了 Impella 支持。Impella 的使用从 2015 年(1%)飙升至 2019 年(4%,p<0.01)。Impella 使用的大幅增加发生在 UNOS 政策变化之后。政策变化后,在 Impella 支持下被列入名单的患者等待时间明显缩短(中位数为 12 天对 45 天,p<0.01)。更多接受 Impella 治疗的患者在政策变化后直接接受移植(80%对 56%,p<0.01),等待名单死亡率显著降低(25%对 13%,p<0.01),转为永久性支持的患者减少(13%对 3%)。政策变化后,可移植性(更快获得器官的可能性)显著提高。多变量 Cox 回归模型显示,政策变化后,接受 Impella 治疗的患者移植后存活率未受不利影响(风险比=0.9;p=0.8)。Impella 使用的增加代表了在心脏移植等待名单上列出和管理患者的实践模式发生了重大变化。

相似文献

1
Use of Impella in Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation.在等待心脏移植患者中使用 Impella。
ASAIO J. 2022 Jun 1;68(6):786-790. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001679. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
2
Impact of Left Ventricular Unloading on Outcome of Heart Transplant Bridging With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in New Allocation Policy.新分配政策下体外膜肺氧合支持下心移植桥接中左心室卸载对预后的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e033590. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033590. Epub 2024 May 14.
3
Acceptable Post-Heart Transplant Outcomes Support Temporary MCS Prioritization in the New OPTN|UNOS Heart Allocation Policy.可接受的心脏移植术后结果支持在新的 OPTN|UNOS 心脏分配政策中优先考虑临时 MCS。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Jan-Feb;53(1):353-357. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.04.1819. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
Characterizing Adaptive Changes and Patient Survival After 2018 Donor Allocation Restructuring: A UNOS Database Analysis.2018 年供者分配结构调整后适应性变化及患者生存情况分析:UNOS 数据库分析
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2024 Jun 1;23(2):81-88. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000359. Epub 2024 May 22.
5
Impella 5.5 as a bridge to heart transplantation: Waitlist outcomes in the United States.Impella 5.5作为心脏移植的过渡手段:美国等待名单上的结果
Clin Transplant. 2023 Oct;37(10):e15066. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15066. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
6
Impact of heart transplant allocation change on competing waitlist outcomes among listing strategies.心脏移植分配变更对不同列入名单策略的候补名单竞争结局的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2021 Jul;35(7):e14345. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14345. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
7
Impact of UNOS allocation policy changes on utilization and outcomes of patients bridged to heart transplant with intra-aortic balloon pump.器官共享联合网络(UNOS)分配政策变化对使用主动脉内球囊反搏过渡到心脏移植的患者的利用情况和结局的影响
Clin Transplant. 2022 Feb;36(2):e14533. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14533. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
8
Comparison of Intraaortic Balloon Pump and Impella 5.5 as Heart Transplant Bridging Strategies.主动脉内球囊泵与 Impella 5.5 在心脏移植桥接策略中的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Oct;116(4):811-817. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.06.021. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
9
Regional differences in recipient waitlist time and pre- and post-transplant mortality after the 2006 United Network for Organ Sharing policy changes in the donor heart allocation algorithm.2006年器官共享联合网络(United Network for Organ Sharing)对供体心脏分配算法进行政策调整后,受者等待名单时间以及移植前后死亡率的地区差异。
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Apr;2(2):166-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.11.005.
10
Use of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Management of Cardiogenic Shock Before and After the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Heart Allocation System Changes.使用临时机械循环支持在器官共享联合网络供心分配系统改变前后管理心原性休克。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):703-708. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0692.

引用本文的文献

1
Does temporary mechanical circulatory support with Impella 5.5 induce de novo human leukocyte antigen antibodies production in heart transplantation candidates?使用Impella 5.5进行临时机械循环支持是否会诱导心脏移植候选者产生新的人类白细胞抗原抗体?
JHLT Open. 2024 Feb 16;4:100072. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100072. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Bridging Over Troubled Waters-How the United States 2018 Heart Allocation System Altered Transplant Bridging Strategies.跨越困境之水——美国2018年心脏分配系统如何改变移植过渡策略
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 20;25(2):68. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2502068. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Heart Transplantation.
心脏移植
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 18;13(2):558. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020558.
4
Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Observational Study.心源性休克患者接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗时,Impella与主动脉内球囊泵的比较:一项观察性研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e032607. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032607. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
Heart waitlist survival in adults with an intra-aortic balloon pump relative to other Status 2, Status 1, and inotrope Status 3 patients.主动脉内球囊泵辅助下成人心脏等待名单生存率与其他 2 级、1 级和 3 级正性肌力药物状态患者的比较。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Mar;42(3):368-376. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.010. Epub 2022 Oct 18.