• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Two-Year Experiences of 500 Appendectomies in Lahore General Hospital, Lahore.拉合尔总医院500例阑尾切除术的两年经验,拉合尔
Cureus. 2022 Jan 16;14(1):e21303. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21303. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies.腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术后的腹腔内脓肿
J Gastrointest Surg. 1997 Mar-Apr;1(2):188-92; discussion 192-3. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(97)80108-4.
3
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].[腹腔镜或开放性阑尾切除术。文献综述与个人经验]
G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7.
4
Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies.腹腔镜和开放性阑尾切除术后的腹腔内脓肿
Surg Endosc. 1996 Mar;10(3):327-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00187382.
5
[Laparoscopic approach in acute appendicitis: experience with 501 consecutive cases].[急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜手术方法:501例连续病例的经验]
Chir Ital. 2009 May-Jun;61(3):327-35.
6
Is mini-laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for children.小儿迷你腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否可行?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004 Apr;14(2):61-5. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200404000-00003.
7
Appendectomy using single-incision pediatric endosurgery for acute and perforated appendicitis.单一切口儿科内镜下阑尾切除术治疗急性和穿孔性阑尾炎。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Dec;24(12):3201-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1115-x. Epub 2010 May 19.
8
Outcome comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的疗效比较:一项基于全国人群的研究证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 12;8(7):e68662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068662. Print 2013.
9
Could an abdominal drainage be avoided in complicated acute appendicitis? Lessons learned after 1300 laparoscopic appendectomies.在复杂的急性阑尾炎中能否避免腹腔引流?1300 例腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的经验教训。
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
10
Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜、开放及中转开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):660-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640020072. Epub 2001 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Complicated appendicitis in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中低收入国家的复杂性阑尾炎:系统评价与荟萃分析
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Jun;95(6):1096-1107. doi: 10.1111/ans.70103. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
2
Can Salmonella typhi Cause Acute Appendicitis?伤寒沙门氏菌会引发急性阑尾炎吗?
Cureus. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):e53213. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53213. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Seasonal Variation in Cases of Acute Appendicitis.急性阑尾炎病例的季节性变化
Surg Res Pract. 2021 Mar 2;2021:8811898. doi: 10.1155/2021/8811898. eCollection 2021.
2
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗:WSES 耶路撒冷指南 2020 年更新版。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.
3
A five-year longitudinal observational study in morbidity and mortality of negative appendectomy in Sulaimani teaching Hospital/Kurdistan Region/Iraq.在伊拉克库尔德地区苏莱曼尼亚教学医院进行的一项为期五年的关于阴性阑尾切除术发病率和死亡率的纵向观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 6;10(1):2028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58847-1.
4
Comparison of Open Appendectomy and Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Perforated Appendicitis.穿孔性阑尾炎的开腹阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较
Cureus. 2019 Jul 9;11(7):e5105. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5105.
5
A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的临床比较:历史队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):847-851. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01086-5. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
6
Acute Appendicitis: Efficient Diagnosis and Management.急性阑尾炎:有效诊断与管理。
Am Fam Physician. 2018 Jul 1;98(1):25-33.
7
Management of Appendicitis Globally Based on Income of Countries (MAGIC) Study.基于国家收入的全球阑尾炎管理(MAGIC)研究
World J Surg. 2018 Dec;42(12):3903-3910. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4736-1.
8
Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, single center experience.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术临床结局的比较:单中心经验
Heliyon. 2018 May 24;4(5):e00635. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00635. eCollection 2018 May.
9
Epidemiology and outcomes of acute abdominal pain in a large urban Emergency Department: retrospective analysis of 5,340 cases.大型城市急诊科急性腹痛的流行病学及结局:5340例病例的回顾性分析
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Oct;4(19):362. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.09.10.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项评估结局和成本效益的回顾性队列研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5. eCollection 2016.

拉合尔总医院500例阑尾切除术的两年经验,拉合尔

Two-Year Experiences of 500 Appendectomies in Lahore General Hospital, Lahore.

作者信息

Shahid Muhammad H, Khan Faisal I, Askri Zain A, Asad Arslan, Saeed Rabia, Talib Talha B, Khan Anwar Z, Fatima Tausief, Afzal Muhammad F

机构信息

General Surgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK.

General Surgery, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Jan 16;14(1):e21303. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21303. eCollection 2022 Jan.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.21303
PMID:35186565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8849461/
Abstract

Introduction Acute appendicitis is a leading cause of abdominal conditions in emergency departments. Evidence from research studies has indicated the efficacies of surgical procedures involving appendectomies. However, in Pakistan, there is a paucity of information regarding the epidemiology, clinical presentations, and surgical management of acute appendicitis. Objective This paper aims to report the epidemiologic data and findings of surgical management of acute appendicitis in Lahore General Hospital (LGH). The data was based on our two-year experiences of appendectomies in the hospital. Materials and methodology Data were collected retrospectively. The patients underwent appendectomies performed by the team of surgeons of Surgical Unit 1 of LGH in the Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department from July 2019 to October 2021. Results The total number of patients was 506, and the mean age was 26.8. Males (67.29%) and young adults aged 18-34 years were at higher risk of appendicitis. Compared to other surgical procedures performed, open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy operative times were significantly shorter. Histopathology of all the cases showed acute inflammation of the appendix. Discussion Similar to findings from other research studies, the operative time of open appendectomies was shorter (70.6 minutes) in the hospital than the operative time of laparoscopic appendectomies (77 minutes). However, the overall operative times were longer than the operative times reported in some other research studies. Also, contrary to other research findings, open appendectomy (1.22 days) was associated with a longer length of hospital stay than laparoscopic appendectomy (≈1 day). Simple acute appendicitis was the most predominant operation findings (289, 57.1%). Conclusion Compared to other hospitals, the shorter hospital stays/recovery time indicated the high surgical skill of performing open and laparoscopic appendectomies in Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

摘要

引言

急性阑尾炎是急诊科腹部疾病的主要病因。研究证据表明了包括阑尾切除术在内的外科手术的有效性。然而,在巴基斯坦,关于急性阑尾炎的流行病学、临床表现和外科治疗的信息匮乏。

目的

本文旨在报告拉合尔综合医院(LGH)急性阑尾炎的流行病学数据和外科治疗结果。数据基于我们在该医院两年的阑尾切除手术经验。

材料与方法

数据回顾性收集。2019年7月至2021年10月期间,在拉合尔综合医院第一外科手术团队于急诊部为患者实施阑尾切除术。

结果

患者总数为506例,平均年龄为26.8岁。男性(67.29%)和18 - 34岁的年轻人患阑尾炎的风险更高。与其他实施的外科手术相比,开腹阑尾切除术和腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术时间明显更短。所有病例的组织病理学检查均显示阑尾急性炎症。

讨论

与其他研究结果相似,该医院开腹阑尾切除术的手术时间(70.6分钟)比腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术时间(77分钟)短。然而,总体手术时间比其他一些研究报告的手术时间更长。此外,与其他研究结果相反,开腹阑尾切除术(1.22天)的住院时间比腹腔镜阑尾切除术(约1天)更长。单纯性急性阑尾炎是最主要的手术发现(289例,57.1%)。

结论

与其他医院相比,较短的住院时间/恢复时间表明巴基斯坦拉合尔拉合尔综合医院在实施开腹和腹腔镜阑尾切除术方面具有较高的外科技术水平。