Chaudhary Saurabh, Jain Sanjeev K, Sharma Nidhi, Bhatnagar Supriti
Anatomy, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Center, Moradabad, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Jan 16;14(1):e21305. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21305. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Anterior knee pain is the most common problem in the young and sporting population. Quadriceps femoris angle and condylar distance are tools to assess the bio-mechanical function of the knee joint. The aim of this research was to give comparative data of quadriceps femoris angle and condylar distance in the Indian population (sedentary/sportsperson). The study also aims to know which parameter (condylar distance/quadriceps angle) is the better predictor for knee pain in the young Indian population.
This study was composed of a total of 130 individuals suffering from anterior knee pain which was divided into two categories; Sedentary and sportsperson. Each category consisted of 65 individuals. Q angle (goniometric method) and condylar distance (manual caliper) of each participant were calculated. A comparison of body parameters was done by independent t-test. Comparison between the two parameters (condylar distance and quadriceps angle) was done to know which is the better predictor of anterior knee pain.
Statistically significant sexual variation (p<0.05) was observed in both quadriceps angle and condylar distance in sedentary and sportsperson groups. Females had a higher value of Q angle than males (p<0.05). The difference in quadriceps angle was statistically significant (p<0.05) between sedentary and sportsperson groups. Cohen's kappa coefficient of Q angle was 0.72 while that of bi-condylar distance was 0.49. Conclusion: Q angle is a better indicator for anterior knee pain than condylar distance. Females in either category; sedentary and sportsperson, had higher Q angle in comparison to males making them more susceptible to disorders of the patellofemoral joint. Hence, encouragement and awareness are needed not only to carry out periodic screening of the susceptible population but also to emphasize its usage in clinical practice and the prognosis of the affected individual after treatment.
膝前痛是年轻人群和运动员群体中最常见的问题。股四头肌角和髁间距离是评估膝关节生物力学功能的指标。本研究的目的是给出印度人群(久坐人群/运动员)股四头肌角和髁间距离的对比数据。该研究还旨在了解哪个参数(髁间距离/股四头肌角)是印度年轻人群膝痛的更好预测指标。
本研究共纳入130例膝前痛患者,分为两类:久坐人群和运动员。每类各65人。计算每位参与者的Q角(测角法)和髁间距离(手动卡尺测量)。通过独立t检验对身体参数进行比较。比较两个参数(髁间距离和股四头肌角)以确定哪个是膝前痛的更好预测指标。
在久坐人群和运动员组中,股四头肌角和髁间距离均观察到具有统计学意义的性别差异(p<0.05)。女性的Q角值高于男性(p<0.05)。久坐人群和运动员组之间的股四头肌角差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。Q角的Cohen's kappa系数为0.72,而双髁间距离的Cohen's kappa系数为0.49。
Q角比髁间距离更能准确指示膝前痛。在久坐人群和运动员这两类人群中,女性相比男性具有更高的Q角,这使她们更易患髌股关节疾病。因此不仅需要鼓励并提高对易感人群进行定期筛查的意识,还应强调其在临床实践中的应用以及对受影响个体治疗后的预后评估。