Zheng Binbin, Beck Dallaghan Gary, Gomez Michael, Holihan Stephen
The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
University of North Carolina, USA.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Feb 14;9:23821205211072723. doi: 10.1177/23821205211072723. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
Twitter offers opportunities to share resources, engage in online discussions, and network with other professionals. In medical education, Twitter is also being used for professional development. Little is known about the level of engagement in topical chats related to medical education. This study explores how medical educators participated and engaged in Twitter-facilitated discussion activity using #MedEdChat.
All twitter chat transcripts using the hashtag #MedEdChat from Thursday night synchronous discussions were collected between January and December 2019. A total of 37 discussion topics were included. To answer the first research question about the overall participation, descriptive statistics were used to analyze the number of participants, posts, retweets, and interactions for each week's discussion. To answer the second question about types of discussion participants engaged in during weekly chats, a combination of top-down and bottom-up coding strategy was adopted with three categories: functional, social, and content.
This study identified five themes from #MedEdChat discussions: curriculum, faculty development, scholarship, assessment, and general medical education topics. All discussions had an average of 26 participants, with an average of 145 total posts, including 37 original posts, 52 retweets, and 56 interactions (mentions or replies using @). In terms of types of discussion, content-related tweets were most frequently posted, followed by functional and social tweets.
By identifying the patterns of participation and content of discussions, preliminary findings suggest implications for future study to further explore the social interactions and knowledge building processes among online participants in the Twitter-facilitated medical education online community.
推特提供了分享资源、参与在线讨论以及与其他专业人士建立联系的机会。在医学教育中,推特也被用于专业发展。对于与医学教育相关的主题聊天的参与程度知之甚少。本研究探讨医学教育工作者如何参与并在推特促进的使用#MedEdChat的讨论活动中进行互动。
收集了2019年1月至12月周四晚上同步讨论中使用#MedEdChat标签的所有推特聊天记录。共纳入37个讨论主题。为回答关于总体参与情况的第一个研究问题,使用描述性统计分析每周讨论的参与者数量、帖子数、转发数和互动数。为回答关于每周聊天中讨论参与者所参与的讨论类型的第二个问题,采用了自上而下和自下而上相结合的编码策略,分为三类:功能性、社交性和内容性。
本研究从#MedEdChat讨论中确定了五个主题:课程、教师发展、学术研究、评估和一般医学教育主题。所有讨论平均有26名参与者,总共平均有145个帖子,包括37个原创帖子、52个转发和56次互动(使用@提及或回复)。在讨论类型方面,与内容相关的推文发布频率最高,其次是功能性和社交性推文。
通过确定参与模式和讨论内容,初步研究结果为未来研究提供了启示,以进一步探索推特促进的医学教育在线社区中在线参与者之间的社会互动和知识构建过程。