Scherer Klaus R
University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Cogn Emot. 2022 Mar;36(2):154-170. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1973378.
Over the last century, emotion research has been beset by the problem of major disagreements with respect to the definition of the phenomenon and an abundance of different theories. Arguably, these divergences have had adverse effects on theory development, on the theoretical foundations of empirical research, and on knowledge accumulation in the study of emotion. Similar problems have been encountered in other areas of behavioural science. Increasingly, there have been calls to work towards some form of theory integration. In contrast, here an effort is made to show that a reasonable degree of in the area of emotion science can be attained by adopting a design feature-based working definition of emotion and highlighting the basic agreement on the components of the dynamic emotion process. The aim is to invite constructive discussion on communalities and divergences between different theories and foster the development of more complementary theoretical frameworks to guide future empirical research.
在过去的一个世纪里,情绪研究一直被关于该现象定义的重大分歧以及大量不同理论所困扰。可以说,这些分歧对理论发展、实证研究的理论基础以及情绪研究中的知识积累都产生了不利影响。行为科学的其他领域也遇到了类似问题。越来越多的人呼吁致力于某种形式的理论整合。相比之下,本文试图表明,通过采用基于设计特征的情绪工作定义并突出动态情绪过程各组成部分的基本共识,在情绪科学领域可以达成一定程度的共识。目的是引发关于不同理论之间的共性和分歧的建设性讨论,并促进发展更具互补性的理论框架,以指导未来的实证研究。