• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pathways for primary care practice adoption of patient engagement strategies.初级保健实践采用患者参与策略的途径。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1087-1093. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13959. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Adoption of Patient Engagement Strategies by Physician Practices in the United States.美国医师执业机构采用患者参与策略。
Med Care. 2022 Sep 1;60(9):691-699. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001748. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
3
Linking Practice Adoption of Patient Engagement Strategies and Relational Coordination to Patient-Reported Outcomes in Accountable Care Organizations.将患者参与策略和关系协调的实践采用与问责制医疗组织中的患者报告结果联系起来。
Milbank Q. 2019 Sep;97(3):692-735. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12400. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
Multilevel influences on patient engagement and chronic care management.多层次影响患者的参与和慢性病管理。
Am J Manag Care. 2023 Apr;29(4):196-202. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89348.
5
Random or predictable?: Adoption patterns of chronic care management practices in physician organizations.随机还是可预测?:医疗机构中慢性病管理实践的采用模式。
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 24;12(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0639-z.
6
Hospital organizational strategies associated with advanced EHR adoption.医院组织策略与先进的电子健康记录采用相关。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr;57(2):259-269. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13655. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
7
Comparing health care system and physician practice influences on social risk screening.比较医疗保健系统和医生实践对社会风险筛查的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2022;47(1):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000309.
8
Sustainability and scalability of a volunteer-based primary care intervention (Health TAPESTRY): a mixed-methods analysis.基于志愿者的初级保健干预措施(健康织锦)的可持续性和可扩展性:一项混合方法分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2468-9.
9
Care Practices to Promote Patient Engagement in VA Primary Care: Factors Associated With High Performance.促进患者参与 VA 初级保健的护理实践:与高绩效相关的因素。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Sep;18(5):397-405. doi: 10.1370/afm.2569.
10
Engaging High-Need Patients in Intensive Outpatient Programs: A Qualitative Synthesis of Engagement Strategies.参与强化门诊项目的高需求患者:参与策略的定性综合
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):1937-1944. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4608-2. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
What are the minimal sample size requirements for Mokken scaling? An empirical example with the Warwick- Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale.Mokken 量表分析的最小样本量要求是多少?以沃里克 - 爱丁堡心理健康量表为例的实证研究
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018 Aug 8;6(1):203-213. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2018.1505520.
2
How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points.医疗保健专业人员在问责制医疗保健组织中如何理解患者的积极性和参与度?在两个时间点进行的定性访谈。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 31;8(10):e023068. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023068.
3
How Is Family Medicine Engaging Patients at the Practice-Level?: A National Sample of Family Physicians.家庭医学如何在实践层面与患者互动?:全国家庭医生样本。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Sep-Oct;31(5):733-742. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.170418.
4
Random or predictable?: Adoption patterns of chronic care management practices in physician organizations.随机还是可预测?:医疗机构中慢性病管理实践的采用模式。
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 24;12(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0639-z.
5
A Multilevel Analysis of Patient Engagement and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Care Practices of Accountable Care Organizations.对责任医疗组织基层医疗实践中患者参与度和患者报告结局的多层次分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):640-647. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3980-z. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
6
"How Can We Talk about Patient-centered Care without Patients at the Table?" Lessons Learned from Patient Advisory Councils.“没有患者参与,我们如何谈论以患者为中心的医疗?” 从患者咨询委员会获得的经验教训。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Nov 12;29(6):775-784. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.150380.
7
The Exnovation of Chronic Care Management Processes by Physician Organizations.医师组织对慢性病管理流程的革新
Milbank Q. 2016 Sep;94(3):626-53. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12213.
8
Ten Years, Forty Decision Aids, And Thousands Of Patient Uses: Shared Decision Making At Massachusetts General Hospital.十年,四十种决策辅助工具,以及数千次患者使用:麻省总医院的共同决策
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):630-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1376.
9
Integrating new practices: a qualitative study of how hospital innovations become routine.整合新实践:关于医院创新如何成为常规做法的定性研究
Implement Sci. 2015 Dec 5;10:168. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0357-3.
10
See One, Do One, Order One: a study protocol for cluster randomized controlled trial testing three strategies for implementing motivational interviewing on medical inpatient units.观摩一例、实践一例、指导一例:一项关于在医疗住院单元实施动机性访谈的三种策略的整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 29;10:138. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0327-9.

初级保健实践采用患者参与策略的途径。

Pathways for primary care practice adoption of patient engagement strategies.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Evidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1087-1093. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13959. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13959
PMID:35188976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9441284/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify potential orderings of primary care practice adoption of patient engagement strategies overall and separately for interpersonally and technologically oriented strategies.

DATA SOURCES

We analyzed physician practice survey data (n = 71) on the adoption of 12 patient engagement strategies.

STUDY DESIGN

Mokken scale analysis was used to assess latent traits among the patient engagement strategies.

DATA COLLECTION

Three groupings of patient engagement strategies were analyzed: (1) all 12 patient engagement strategies, (2) six interpersonally oriented strategies, and (3) six technologically oriented strategies.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We did not find scalability among all 12 patient engagement strategies, however, separately analyzing the subgroups of six interpersonally and six technologically oriented strategies demonstrated scalability (Loevinger's H coefficient of scalability [range]: interpersonal strategies, H = 0.54 [0.49-0.60], technological strategies, H = 0.42 [0.31, 0.54]). Ordered patterns emerged in the adoption of strategies for both interpersonal and technological types.

CONCLUSIONS

Common pathways of practice adoption of patient engagement strategies were identified. Implementing interpersonally intensive patient engagement strategies may require different physician practice capabilities than technological strategies. Rather than simultaneously adopting multiple patient engagement strategies, gradual and purposeful practice adoption may improve the impact of these strategies and support sustainability.

摘要

目的

确定初级保健实践整体采用患者参与策略的潜在顺序,以及人际和技术导向策略分别采用的潜在顺序。

数据来源

我们分析了 71 名医生实践调查数据,这些数据涉及 12 种患者参与策略的采用情况。

研究设计

Mokken 量表分析用于评估患者参与策略之间的潜在特征。

数据收集

分析了三组患者参与策略:(1)所有 12 种患者参与策略,(2)6 种人际导向策略,(3)6 种技术导向策略。

主要发现

我们没有发现所有 12 种患者参与策略之间的可扩展性,但是,分别分析人际和技术导向策略的 6 个子组显示出可扩展性(人际策略的 Loevinger's H 可扩展性系数 [范围]:H = 0.54 [0.49-0.60],技术策略,H = 0.42 [0.31, 0.54])。人际和技术类型的策略采用都出现了有序模式。

结论

确定了患者参与策略采用的共同途径。实施人际密集型患者参与策略可能需要医生实践能力与技术策略不同。与其同时采用多种患者参与策略,逐步和有目的的实践采用可能会提高这些策略的影响,并支持可持续性。