• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为改善师生互动的一项功能,辅导对学前儿童参与度和读写技能的间接影响。

Indirect effects of coaching on pre-K students' engagement and literacy skill as a function of improved teacher-student interaction.

作者信息

Pianta Robert C, Lipscomb Daniel, Ruzek Erik

机构信息

University of Virginia, United States of America.

University of Virginia, United States of America.

出版信息

J Sch Psychol. 2022 Apr;91:65-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2021.12.003
PMID:35190080
Abstract

The present study is a secondary analysis of a randomized control trial that had established the causal impact of MyTeachingPartner (MTP) coaching for improving the quality of teacher-student interactions. This study reports auxiliary analyses of the extent to which MTP was associated indirectly with classroom engagement and literacy outcomes for pre-kindergarten (pre-K) students as a function of the association of dosage of MTP cycles with teacher-student interactions. The number of coaching cycles a teacher completed was examined as a predictor of teacher-student interactions, as were corresponding direct or indirect associations with students' early literacy outcomes. The significant indirect effects detected provided support for the premise that coaching can improve student outcomes as a function of improvements in teachers' behaviors with students. When exposed to more cycles of feedback regarding interactions, teachers demonstrated improvements in their emotionally supportive interactions with students, which in turn predicted greater increases in students' positive classroom engagement. No significant indirect associations were detected for literacy outcomes. This linkage of coaching inputs, teacher-student interaction, and students' increased engagement confirms the hypothesized effects and theory of change associated with MTP and of coaching more generally.

摘要

本研究是一项随机对照试验的二次分析,该试验已确定了MyTeachingPartner(MTP)辅导对提高师生互动质量的因果影响。本研究报告了辅助分析,即MTP作为MTP周期剂量与师生互动关联的函数,在多大程度上与学前儿童(学前班)的课堂参与度和读写能力结果间接相关。将教师完成的辅导周期数作为师生互动的预测指标进行检验,同时也检验了与学生早期读写能力结果相应的直接或间接关联。检测到的显著间接效应支持了这样一个前提,即辅导可以随着教师与学生互动行为的改善而提高学生的成绩。当教师接触到更多关于互动的反馈周期时,他们与学生的情感支持性互动得到改善,这反过来又预示着学生在课堂上的积极参与度会有更大提高。未检测到与读写能力结果的显著间接关联。辅导投入、师生互动和学生参与度提高之间的这种联系证实了与MTP以及更普遍的辅导相关的假设效应和变革理论。

相似文献

1
Indirect effects of coaching on pre-K students' engagement and literacy skill as a function of improved teacher-student interaction.作为改善师生互动的一项功能,辅导对学前儿童参与度和读写技能的间接影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Apr;91:65-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
2
Coaching Teachers to Improve Students' School Readiness Skills: Indirect Effects of Teacher-Student Interaction.培训教师以提高学生的学校准备技能:师生互动的间接影响。
Child Dev. 2021 Nov;92(6):2509-2528. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13600. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
3
Instructional coaching actions that predict teacher classroom practices and student achievement.指导型教练行为对教师课堂实践和学生成绩的预测作用。
J Sch Psychol. 2023 Feb;96:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
4
A randomized controlled trial of instructional coaching in high-poverty urban schools: Examining teacher practices and student outcomes.一项在高贫困城市学校中开展的教学指导的随机对照试验:考察教师实践与学生成果。
J Sch Psychol. 2021 Jun;86:151-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
Focusing on teacher-student interactions eliminates the negative impact of students' disruptive behavior on teacher perceptions.关注师生互动可消除学生的破坏性行为对教师认知的负面影响。
Int J Behav Dev. 2015 Sep;39(5):426-431. doi: 10.1177/0165025415579455. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
6
Testing the combined effects of the PAX Good Behavior Game and MyTeachingPartner™ coaching for early career teachers: Impacts on teacher-student interaction quality and teachers' occupational health.测试 PAX 良好行为游戏和 MyTeachingPartner™ 教练对新教师的综合影响:对师生互动质量和教师职业健康的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Oct;106:101359. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101359. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
7
Teacher Coaching: Increasing Deaf Students' Active Engagement Through Flexible Instructional Arrangements.教师辅导:通过灵活的教学安排提高聋生的积极参与度。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2021 Dec 16;27(1):73-88. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enab031.
8
Teacher-student interaction and lower secondary school students' situational engagement.师生互动与初中生情境参与。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Jun;89(2):374-392. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12244. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
9
Class- and subject teachers' self-efficacy and emotional stability and students' perceptions of the teacher-student relationship, classroom management, and classroom disruptions.班主任和学科教师的自我效能感和情绪稳定性,以及学生对师生关系、课堂管理和课堂干扰的看法。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jul 8;9(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00606-6.
10
Student, teacher, and classroom predictors of between-teacher variance of students' teacher-rated behavior.学生、教师及课堂因素对学生教师评价行为的教师间差异的预测作用
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Sep;33(3):460-468. doi: 10.1037/spq0000241. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation Science in School Mental Health: A 10-Year Progress Update and Development of a New Research Agenda.学校心理健康领域的实施科学:十年进展更新与新研究议程的制定
School Ment Health. 2024 Dec;16(4):1013-1037. doi: 10.1007/s12310-024-09731-0. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Exploratory Procedure for Component-Based Structural Equation Modeling for Simple Structure by Simultaneous Rotation.基于成分的探索性结构方程建模的简单结构的同时旋转方法
Psychometrika. 2024 Jun;89(2):411-438. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09942-5. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Predicting implementation of the PAX Good Behavior Game + MyTeachingPartner interventions.
预测PAX良好行为游戏+我的教学伙伴干预措施的实施情况。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 10;14:1059138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059138. eCollection 2023.
4
Causal explanation of academic enthusiasm based on the interaction of teachers and English language learners: Self-regulation, academic hope, and academic engagement among English language learners.基于教师与英语学习者互动的学习热情因果解释:英语学习者的自我调节、学习希望和学习参与度
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 12;13:997903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997903. eCollection 2022.