• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注师生互动可消除学生的破坏性行为对教师认知的负面影响。

Focusing on teacher-student interactions eliminates the negative impact of students' disruptive behavior on teacher perceptions.

作者信息

Hafen Christopher A, Ruzek Erik A, Gregory Anne, Allen Joseph P, Mikami Amori Yee

机构信息

University of Virginia, USA.

Rutgers University, USA.

出版信息

Int J Behav Dev. 2015 Sep;39(5):426-431. doi: 10.1177/0165025415579455. Epub 2015 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1177/0165025415579455
PMID:28148993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5279890/
Abstract

This study tests the impact of a randomly assigned professional development coaching intervention (MyTeachingPartner-Secondary; MTP-S) on teacher projections of their students' educational attainment. Results indicate that students who report more behavior problems in the Fall of the academic year are projected by teachers to have lower future educational attainment in the Spring of the academic year. However, analyses further indicate that participation in the MTP-S intervention moderates the association between Fall student behavior problems and teachers' Spring projections for student attainment, such that this link is not significant for students in classrooms where the teacher is participating in MTP-S. In fact, results indicate that teachers who participate in the intervention project better educational attainment for their students than teachers who are in a business-as-usual control condition, regardless of their students' behavior. Findings are discussed in terms of the role that interventions targeting classroom interactions may play in altering teachers' internal view of students, thus ultimately promoting adolescent development.

摘要

本研究测试了随机分配的专业发展辅导干预措施(中学版我的教学伙伴;MTP-S)对教师对其学生学业成就预测的影响。结果表明,教师预计在学年秋季报告更多行为问题的学生在学年春季的未来学业成就较低。然而,分析进一步表明,参与MTP-S干预会调节秋季学生行为问题与教师对春季学生学业成就预测之间的关联,以至于对于教师参与MTP-S的课堂中的学生而言,这种联系并不显著。事实上,结果表明,参与干预的教师预测其学生的学业成就比处于常规控制条件下的教师更好,无论其学生的行为如何。研究结果从针对课堂互动的干预措施在改变教师对学生的内在看法从而最终促进青少年发展中可能发挥的作用方面进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a433/5279890/b550ec74aa5d/nihms836996f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a433/5279890/b550ec74aa5d/nihms836996f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a433/5279890/b550ec74aa5d/nihms836996f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Focusing on teacher-student interactions eliminates the negative impact of students' disruptive behavior on teacher perceptions.关注师生互动可消除学生的破坏性行为对教师认知的负面影响。
Int J Behav Dev. 2015 Sep;39(5):426-431. doi: 10.1177/0165025415579455. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
2
Effects of a Teacher Professional Development Intervention on Peer Relationships in Secondary Classrooms.教师专业发展干预对中学课堂同伴关系的影响。
School Psych Rev. 2011;40(3):367-385.
3
Indirect effects of coaching on pre-K students' engagement and literacy skill as a function of improved teacher-student interaction.作为改善师生互动的一项功能,辅导对学前儿童参与度和读写技能的间接影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Apr;91:65-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
4
Student and teacher perceptions of school climate: a multilevel exploration of patterns of discrepancy.学生和教师对学校氛围的看法:差异模式的多层次探索。
J Sch Health. 2010 Jun;80(6):271-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00501.x.
5
Class- and subject teachers' self-efficacy and emotional stability and students' perceptions of the teacher-student relationship, classroom management, and classroom disruptions.班主任和学科教师的自我效能感和情绪稳定性,以及学生对师生关系、课堂管理和课堂干扰的看法。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jul 8;9(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00606-6.
6
Teachers' emotional experiences in response to daily events with individual students varying in perceived past disruptive behavior.教师对有过被认为是扰乱行为的过往的个别学生的日常事件的情绪体验存在差异。
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Oct;82:85-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
The Downstream Effects of Teacher Well-Being Programs: Improvements in Teachers' Stress, Cognition and Well-Being Benefit Their Students.教师幸福计划的下游效应:教师压力、认知和幸福感的改善有益于他们的学生。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 1;12:689628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689628. eCollection 2021.
8
Similarities and dissimilarities between teachers' and students' relationship views in upper elementary school: The role of personal teacher and student attributes.小学高年段师生关系观点的异同:个人教师和学生属性的作用。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Oct;64:43-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 10.
9
Testing the combined effects of the PAX Good Behavior Game and MyTeachingPartner™ coaching for early career teachers: Impacts on teacher-student interaction quality and teachers' occupational health.测试 PAX 良好行为游戏和 MyTeachingPartner™ 教练对新教师的综合影响:对师生互动质量和教师职业健康的影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Oct;106:101359. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101359. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
10
A well-slept teacher is a better teacher: A multi-respondent experience-sampling study on sleep, stress, and emotional transmission in the classroom.睡眠良好的教师是更优秀的教师:一项关于课堂上睡眠、压力和情绪传递的多应答者经验抽样研究。
Psych J. 2019 Sep;8(3):280-292. doi: 10.1002/pchj.282. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Which virtual education methods do e‑students prefer? Design and validation of Virtual Education Preferences Questionnaire (VEPQ).电子学生更喜欢哪种虚拟教育方法?虚拟教育偏好问卷(VEPQ)的设计与验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 3;23(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04687-2.
2
Focused Classroom Coaching and Widespread Racial Equity in School Discipline.聚焦课堂指导与学校纪律中的广泛种族平等。
AERA Open. 2019 Oct 1;5(4):1-15. doi: 10.1177/2332858419897274. Epub 2019 Dec 22.
3
Teachers' Implicit Attitudes Toward Students From Different Social Groups: A Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Teaching Through Interactions in Secondary School Classrooms: Revisiting the Factor Structure and Practical Application of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System-Secondary.中学课堂互动教学:重新审视课堂评估评分系统(中学版)的因素结构与实际应用
J Early Adolesc. 2015 Jun;35(5-6):651-680. doi: 10.1177/0272431614537117. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
2
It takes a village: the effects of 10th grade college-going expectations of students, parents, and teachers four years later.需要一个村庄:十年级学生、家长和教师四年后对大学入学期望的影响。
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Sep;52(1-2):41-55. doi: 10.1007/s10464-013-9575-5.
3
教师对不同社会群体学生的隐性态度:一项元分析。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 13;10:2832. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02832. eCollection 2019.
4
Pre- and In-Service Teachers' Attitudes Toward Students With Learning Difficulties and Challenging Behavior.在职前和在职教师对学习困难及行为具有挑战性的学生的态度。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 25;10:327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00327. eCollection 2019.
Effects of a Teacher Professional Development Intervention on Peer Relationships in Secondary Classrooms.
教师专业发展干预对中学课堂同伴关系的影响。
School Psych Rev. 2011;40(3):367-385.
4
Moderating effects of teacher-student relationship in adolescent trajectories of emotional and behavioral adjustment.教师-学生关系对青少年情绪和行为调整轨迹的调节作用。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Apr;49(4):690-705. doi: 10.1037/a0027916. Epub 2012 May 14.
5
An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement.基于互动的方法来增强中学教学和学生成绩。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):1034-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1207998.
6
More problems and less support: early adolescent adjustment forecasts changes in perceived support from parents.更多问题与更少支持:青少年早期的适应状况预示着来自父母的感知支持的变化。
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Apr;23(2):193-202. doi: 10.1037/a0015077.
7
Developmental commentary: individual and contextual influences on student-teacher relationships and children's early problem behaviors.发展性评论:个体及情境因素对师生关系和儿童早期问题行为的影响
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008 Jul;37(3):600-8. doi: 10.1080/15374410802148160.
8
Reciprocal relations between teacher-child conflict and aggressive behavior in kindergarten: a three-wave longitudinal study.幼儿园师生冲突与攻击性行为之间的相互关系:一项三波纵向研究。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008 Jul;37(3):588-99. doi: 10.1080/15374410802148079.
9
Relationships matter: linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement.关系很重要:将教师支持与学生参与度和成绩联系起来。
J Sch Health. 2004 Sep;74(7):262-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x.
10
Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence.高效教师与优秀家长相似吗?青少年早期的教学风格与学生适应情况。
Child Dev. 2002 Jan-Feb;73(1):287-301. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00406.