Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Crosstown, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2022 Aug;26(8):2783-2797. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03623-7. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
To support translation of evidence-based interventions into practice for HIV patients at high risk of treatment failure, we conducted qualitative research in Cape Town, South Africa. After local health officials vetted interventions as potentially scalable, we held 41 in-depth interviews with patients with elevated viral load or a 3-month treatment gap at community clinics, followed by focus group discussions (FGDs) with 20 providers (physicians/nurses, counselors, and community health care workers). Interviews queried treatment barriers, solutions, and specific intervention options, including motivational text messages, data-informed counseling, individual counseling, peer support groups, check-in texts, and treatment buddies. Based on patients' preferences, motivational texts and treatment buddies were removed from consideration in subsequent FGDs. Patients most preferred peer support groups and check-in texts while individual counseling garnered the broadest support among providers. Check-in texts, peer support groups, and data-informed counseling were also endorsed by provider sub-groups. These strategies warrant attention for scale-up in South Africa and other resource-constrained settings.
为支持将基于证据的干预措施转化为治疗失败风险高的艾滋病毒感染者的实践,我们在南非开普敦开展了定性研究。在当地卫生官员审查干预措施是否具有潜在可扩展性之后,我们在社区诊所对病毒载量升高或治疗中断 3 个月的患者进行了 41 次深入访谈,随后与 20 名提供者(医生/护士、顾问和社区卫生工作者)进行了焦点小组讨论(FGD)。访谈询问了治疗障碍、解决方案和具体的干预选择,包括激励性短信、基于数据的咨询、个体咨询、同伴支持小组、签到短信和治疗伙伴。根据患者的偏好,激励性短信和治疗伙伴在随后的 FGD 中被排除考虑。患者最倾向于同伴支持小组和签到短信,而个体咨询则在提供者中获得最广泛的支持。签到短信、同伴支持小组和基于数据的咨询也得到了提供者亚组的认可。这些策略值得在南非和其他资源有限的环境中注意并推广。