Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Institute of Product Development and Engineering Design, Technische Hochschule Köln, Cologne, Germany.
J Clin Nurs. 2023 May;32(9-10):1979-1992. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16260. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
Providing the first meta-analysis of risk factors for pressure ulcer development in adult patients.
Pressure ulcers remain a serious health complication for patients and nursing staff. However, there is a lack of statistical evidence for risk factors as previous research did not include any quantitative synthesis.
Meta-analysis, using PRISMA guidelines.
Studies from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and other reviews and sources were screened and checked against the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was evaluated using a slightly modified QUIPS tool. Data regarding population, design, statistical analysis and risk factors were extracted. Meta-analysis with comparable studies was conducted for age, sex, and Braden scale. The sub-group analysis was used to account for heterogeneity.
28 studies with 570,162 patients were entered in meta-analysis. Older age and a low total Braden scale score increased the risk for pressure ulcers. All subscales excluding 'moisture' reached significance in meta-analysis based only on few studies, however, limiting overall evidence. Male sex achieved mixed results, too.
The first meta-analytic analysis shows evidence for age and Braden scale as risk factors for pressure ulcer development. Limitations regarding study quality and heterogeneity must be considered, highlighting the need for unifying certain conditions in risk factor research.
Patients at risk for new pressure ulcers can be identified by their total Braden score and age, whereas the latter is also connected to deeper pressure ulcers. Nurses and health personnel should pay great attention to patients in older age and undergo specific training to utilise and evaluate the Braden scale effectively, if necessary.
对成人患者发生压疮的危险因素进行首次荟萃分析。
压疮仍然是患者和护理人员面临的严重健康并发症。然而,由于之前的研究没有包括任何定量综合分析,因此缺乏统计证据来证明危险因素的存在。
使用 PRISMA 指南进行荟萃分析。
从 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL Complete、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 以及其他综述和来源筛选研究,并根据纳入标准进行检查。使用稍微修改后的 QUIPS 工具评估偏倚风险。提取有关人群、设计、统计分析和危险因素的数据。对年龄、性别和 Braden 量表进行了具有可比性的研究的荟萃分析。使用亚组分析来解释异质性。
有 28 项研究纳入了 570,162 名患者进行荟萃分析。年龄较大和总 Braden 量表评分较低会增加压疮的风险。除“湿度”外的所有子量表仅根据少数研究进行荟萃分析后达到了统计学意义,但总体证据有限。男性性别也得出了混合结果。
首次荟萃分析表明年龄和 Braden 量表是压疮发展的危险因素。必须考虑研究质量和异质性的限制,突出在危险因素研究中统一某些条件的必要性。
可通过患者的总 Braden 评分和年龄识别新发生压疮的风险患者,而后者也与更深的压疮有关。护士和卫生人员应特别注意老年患者,并进行特定培训,以有效地利用和评估 Braden 量表,如果有必要的话。