Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000-232 Coimbra, Portugal.
International Iberian Laboratory of Nanotechnology (INL), 4715-330 Braga, Portugal.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4039. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054039.
This study aimed to evaluate a clothing prototype that incorporates sensors for the evaluation of pressure, temperature, and humidity for the prevention of pressure injuries, namely regarding physical and comfort requirements. A mixed-method approach was used with concurrent quantitative and qualitative data triangulation. A structured questionnaire was applied before a focus group of experts to evaluate the sensor prototypes. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics and the discourse of the collective subject, followed by method integration and meta-inferences. Nine nurses, experts in this topic, aged 32.66 ± 6.28 years and with a time of profession of 10.88 ± 6.19 years, participated in the study. Prototype A presented low evaluation in stiffness (1.56 ± 1.01) and roughness (2.11 ± 1.17). Prototype B showed smaller values in dimension (2.77 ± 0.83) and stiffness (3.00 ± 1.22). Embroidery was assessed as inadequate in terms of stiffness (1.88 ± 1.05) and roughness (2.44 ± 1.01). The results from the questionnaires and focus groups' show low adequacy as to stiffness, roughness, and comfort. The participants highlighted the need for improvements regarding stiffness and comfort, suggesting new proposals for the development of sensors for clothing. The main conclusions are that Prototype A presented the lowest average scores relative to rigidity (1.56 ± 1.01), considered inadequate. This dimension of Prototype B was evaluated as slightly adequate (2.77 ± 0.83). The rigidity (1.88 ± 1.05) of Prototype A + B + embroidery was evaluated as inadequate. The prototype revealed clothing sensors with low adequacy regarding the physical requirements, such as stiffness or roughness. Improvements are needed regarding the stiffness and roughness for the safety and comfort characteristics of the device evaluated.
本研究旨在评估一种服装原型,该原型结合了用于评估压力、温度和湿度的传感器,以预防压力性损伤,即针对物理和舒适要求。采用混合方法,同时进行定量和定性数据三角测量。在专家焦点小组之前应用了一份结构化问卷,以评估传感器原型。使用描述性和推论性统计以及集体主体的话语对数据进行分析,然后进行方法整合和元推断。9 名护士,该主题的专家,年龄 32.66±6.28 岁,专业时间 10.88±6.19 年,参与了这项研究。原型 A 在刚性(1.56±1.01)和粗糙度(2.11±1.17)方面的评价较低。原型 B 在尺寸(2.77±0.83)和刚性(3.00±1.22)方面显示出较小的值。刺绣在刚性(1.88±1.05)和粗糙度(2.44±1.01)方面的评估不足。问卷调查和焦点小组的结果显示,在刚性、粗糙度和舒适性方面的充分性较低。参与者强调需要改进刚性和舒适性,为服装传感器的开发提出了新的建议。主要结论是,原型 A 相对于刚性(1.56±1.01)呈现出最低的平均得分,被认为是不充分的。原型 B 的这个维度被评估为略有充分(2.77±0.83)。原型 A+B+刺绣的刚性(1.88±1.05)被评估为不充分。该原型表明,服装传感器在刚性或粗糙度等物理要求方面的充分性较低。需要改进设备的刚性和粗糙度,以确保设备的安全和舒适性。