Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National PingTung University, No. 4-18 Ming Shen Road, PingTung, Taiwan, ROC.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Oct;54(5):1219-1230. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01331-w. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
The Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS) is one of commonly used measures for assessing individuals' perfectionism. The main purpose of this current study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS) within the framework of the Rasch model. The sample consisted of 502 adolescents (53% males and 47% females). This study revealed were several important findings. First, adolescents interpreted the categories of the rating scales of the BTPS as intended and items demonstrated good targeting with the operating ranges from - 4.79 to 4.47 logits for rigid perfectionism, from - 3.84 to 3.76 logits for self-critical perfectionism and from - 4.04 to 3.92 logits for narcissistic perfectionism. Second, rigid perfectionism, self-critical perfectionism and narcissistic perfectionism exhibited unidimensionally, providing justification for the use of summed scores for each scale. Third, the average item difficulty of facets was different within each scale, with the facets of self-worth contingencies, socially prescribed perfectionism and other-oriented perfectionism being more difficult to endorse in their belonging scale. Fourth, there were no DIF items across sex, suggesting that items in three scales functioned equally across boys and girls. Fifth, rigid perfectionism (r = 0.15) and self-critical perfectionism (r = 0.55) were positively associated with neuroticism, but self-critical perfectionism (r = - 0.24) and narcissistic perfectionism (r = - 0.29) were negatively related with agreeableness. Finally, sex moderated the associations between rigid perfectionism and neuroticism. In sum, the findings in this study enhance psychometric properties of the BTPS.
大五完美主义量表(BTPS)是评估个体完美主义的常用量表之一。本研究的主要目的是在 Rasch 模型框架内评估大五完美主义量表(BTPS)的心理测量特性。样本由 502 名青少年(53%为男性,47%为女性)组成。本研究有几个重要发现。首先,青少年对 BTPS 量表的评分等级的解释与预期一致,并且项目具有良好的目标定位,其操作范围从僵化完美主义的-4.79 到 4.47 对数单位,从自我批判完美主义的-3.84 到 3.76 对数单位,以及从自恋完美主义的-4.04 到 3.92 对数单位。其次,僵化完美主义、自我批判完美主义和自恋完美主义表现出单维性,为每个量表的总和得分提供了使用依据。第三,每个量表内的各个方面的平均项目难度不同,自我价值条件、社会规定的完美主义和他人导向的完美主义等方面在其所属量表中更难得到认可。第四,在性别上没有 DIF 项目,表明三个量表中的项目在男孩和女孩中具有相同的功能。第五,僵化完美主义(r=0.15)和自我批判完美主义(r=0.55)与神经质呈正相关,但自我批判完美主义(r=-0.24)和自恋完美主义(r=-0.29)与宜人性呈负相关。最后,性别调节了僵化完美主义与神经质之间的关系。总之,本研究的发现提高了 BTPS 的心理测量特性。