• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大五完美主义量表的心理测量学特性:Rasch 分析。

Psychometric Properties of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale: Rasch Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National PingTung University, No. 4-18 Ming Shen Road, PingTung, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Oct;54(5):1219-1230. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01331-w. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10578-022-01331-w
PMID:35192088
Abstract

The Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS) is one of commonly used measures for assessing individuals' perfectionism. The main purpose of this current study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale (BTPS) within the framework of the Rasch model. The sample consisted of 502 adolescents (53% males and 47% females). This study revealed were several important findings. First, adolescents interpreted the categories of the rating scales of the BTPS as intended and items demonstrated good targeting with the operating ranges from - 4.79 to 4.47 logits for rigid perfectionism, from - 3.84 to 3.76 logits for self-critical perfectionism and from - 4.04 to 3.92 logits for narcissistic perfectionism. Second, rigid perfectionism, self-critical perfectionism and narcissistic perfectionism exhibited unidimensionally, providing justification for the use of summed scores for each scale. Third, the average item difficulty of facets was different within each scale, with the facets of self-worth contingencies, socially prescribed perfectionism and other-oriented perfectionism being more difficult to endorse in their belonging scale. Fourth, there were no DIF items across sex, suggesting that items in three scales functioned equally across boys and girls. Fifth, rigid perfectionism (r = 0.15) and self-critical perfectionism (r = 0.55) were positively associated with neuroticism, but self-critical perfectionism (r = - 0.24) and narcissistic perfectionism (r = - 0.29) were negatively related with agreeableness. Finally, sex moderated the associations between rigid perfectionism and neuroticism. In sum, the findings in this study enhance psychometric properties of the BTPS.

摘要

大五完美主义量表(BTPS)是评估个体完美主义的常用量表之一。本研究的主要目的是在 Rasch 模型框架内评估大五完美主义量表(BTPS)的心理测量特性。样本由 502 名青少年(53%为男性,47%为女性)组成。本研究有几个重要发现。首先,青少年对 BTPS 量表的评分等级的解释与预期一致,并且项目具有良好的目标定位,其操作范围从僵化完美主义的-4.79 到 4.47 对数单位,从自我批判完美主义的-3.84 到 3.76 对数单位,以及从自恋完美主义的-4.04 到 3.92 对数单位。其次,僵化完美主义、自我批判完美主义和自恋完美主义表现出单维性,为每个量表的总和得分提供了使用依据。第三,每个量表内的各个方面的平均项目难度不同,自我价值条件、社会规定的完美主义和他人导向的完美主义等方面在其所属量表中更难得到认可。第四,在性别上没有 DIF 项目,表明三个量表中的项目在男孩和女孩中具有相同的功能。第五,僵化完美主义(r=0.15)和自我批判完美主义(r=0.55)与神经质呈正相关,但自我批判完美主义(r=-0.24)和自恋完美主义(r=-0.29)与宜人性呈负相关。最后,性别调节了僵化完美主义与神经质之间的关系。总之,本研究的发现提高了 BTPS 的心理测量特性。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale: Rasch Analysis.大五完美主义量表的心理测量学特性:Rasch 分析。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Oct;54(5):1219-1230. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01331-w. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
The Big Three Perfectionism Scale-Short Form: An item response theory analysis of Italian workers.三大完美主义量表简版:对意大利工人的项目反应理论分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:971226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971226. eCollection 2022.
3
Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale-Short Form (BTPS-SF) in a community sample of adults.大五完美主义量表短式版(BTPS-SF)阿拉伯语翻译版在成人社区样本中的心理测量学特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):932. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05427-y.
4
What Lies Beyond the Superordinate Trait Perfectionism Factors? The Perfectionistic Self-Presentation and Perfectionism Cognitions Inventory Versus the Big Three Perfectionism Scale in Predicting Depression and Social Anxiety.超越上级特质完美主义因素的是什么?完美主义自我呈现和完美主义认知量表与大五完美主义量表在预测抑郁和社交焦虑方面的比较。
J Pers Assess. 2020 May-Jun;102(3):370-379. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1573429. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
5
Psychometric properties of the Big Three Perfectionism Scale-Short Form (BTPS-SF) among Iranian University students.《大五完美主义量表短式版(BTPS-SF)在伊朗大学生中的心理测量学特性》
Brain Behav. 2023 Nov;13(11):e3227. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3227. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
6
[Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].[完美主义中的失败影响与性别差异]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):125-35.
7
[Girls are more successful than boys at the university. Gender group differences in models integrating motivational and aggressive components correlated with Test-Anxiety].在大学里女生比男生更成功。整合动机和攻击性成分的模型中的性别群体差异与考试焦虑相关。
Encephale. 2004 Jan-Feb;30(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95410-3.
8
Psychometric properties of the child and adolescent perfectionism scale in ecuadorian adolescents.厄瓜多尔青少年儿童和青少年完美主义量表的心理测量特性。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jul 1;272:176-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.04.036. Epub 2020 May 1.
9
An Italian adaptation of the Child-Adolescent Perfectionism Scale: Testing measurement invariance across grade levels and exploring associations with academic achievement.《儿童-青少年完美主义量表的义大利文版:跨年级测试测量不变性,并探讨与学业成绩的关系》
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):e0255814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255814. eCollection 2021.
10
Psychometric properties of the 26-item eating attitudes test (EAT-26): an application of rasch analysis.26项饮食态度测试(EAT - 26)的心理测量特性:拉施分析的应用
J Eat Disord. 2022 May 4;10(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00580-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The big three perfectionism scales: A psychometric characterization of a Chinese music student population.三大完美主义量表:对中国音乐专业学生群体的心理测量学特征分析
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 4;20(4):e0320837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320837. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Perfectionism and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: A Meta-Analytic Review.完美主义与五因素人格模型:元分析综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Sep/Oct;23(4):367-390. doi: 10.1177/1088868318814973. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
2
The Relationship Between Perfectionism and Psychopathology: A Meta-Analysis.完美主义与精神病理学之间的关系:一项元分析。
J Clin Psychol. 2017 Oct;73(10):1301-1326. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22435. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
3
Sample Size and Statistical Conclusions from Tests of Fit to the Rasch Model According to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (Rumm) Program in Health Outcome Measurement.
根据健康结果测量中的拉施单维测量模型(Rumm)程序,样本量与拉施模型拟合检验的统计结论
J Appl Meas. 2016;17(4):416-431.
4
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.下一个大五人格量表(BFI-2):开发和评估一个具有 15 个方面的层次模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data.拉施模型分析是否适用于评估项目特征的小样本量预试验研究?以患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛行为项目库数据为例。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):485-93. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0487-5. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
6
Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: a clinical review.完美主义作为一种跨诊断过程:临床综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Mar;31(2):203-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 5.
7
Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals.使用项目拟合统计和残差主成分分析来检测和评估多维性的影响。
J Appl Meas. 2002;3(2):205-31.
8
Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness.优化评定量表类别有效性。
J Appl Meas. 2002;3(1):85-106.
9
Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval.观察结果始终是有序的;然而,测量值必须是区间的。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Nov;70(12):857-60.