• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Processing Evidence for the Grammatical Encoding of the Mass/Count Distinction in Mandarin Chinese.

作者信息

Yao Panpan, Stockall Linnaea, Hall David, Borer Hagit

机构信息

School of Psychology, Beijing Language and Culture University, #15 Xueyuan Street, Haidian District, Beijing, China.

Department of Linguistics, Queen Mary University of London, ArtsOne. 1.10, London, UK.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Apr;51(2):341-371. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09844-0. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-022-09844-0
PMID:35192128
Abstract

Using the Visual World Paradigm, the current study aimed to explore whether the mass/count distinction is determined by syntax in Mandarin Chinese, focusing on classified nouns in nominal phrases. By using dual-role classifiers, ontological count and mass nouns, and phrase structures with and without biased syntactic cues we found that the mass/count distinction is initially computed using phrase structure but can be overridden in cases where the syntax is incompatible with nouns' ontological meanings. The results indicate that in Mandarin Chinese, syntactic cues can be rapidly used to make predictions about upcoming information in real time processing.

摘要

相似文献

1
Processing Evidence for the Grammatical Encoding of the Mass/Count Distinction in Mandarin Chinese.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Apr;51(2):341-371. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09844-0. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Classifiers as Count Syntax: Individuation and Measurement in the Acquisition of Mandarin Chinese.作为计数句法的分类词:汉语普通话习得中的个体化与度量
Lang Learn Dev. 2008 Oct 1;4(4):249. doi: 10.1080/15475440802333858.
3
Garlic and ginger are not like apples and oranges: Effects of mass/count information on the production of noun phrases in English.大蒜和姜并非截然不同:数量信息对英语名词短语生成的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Mar;71(3):717-748. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1276203. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: new evidence on the role of syntax and semantics.正常发育儿童与语法特定性语言障碍儿童的数量-质量区分:关于句法和语义作用的新证据
J Commun Disord. 2008 May-Jun;41(3):274-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
5
Concepts of objects and substances in language.语言中物体和物质的概念。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Aug;26(4):1238-1256. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01613-w.
6
Syntactic Cues Help Disambiguate Objects Referred to With Count Nouns: Illustration With Malay Children.句法线索有助于消除计数名词所指对象的歧义:马来儿童的例证。
Child Dev. 2021 Jan;92(1):101-114. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13401. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
7
Representation and processing of mass and count nouns: a review.质量名词和计数名词的表示和处理:综述。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 11;5:589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00589. eCollection 2014.
8
Encoding individuals in language using syntax, words, and pragmatic inference.运用句法、词汇和语用推理,用语言对个体进行编码。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;7(5):341-53. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1396. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
9
Evidence for a distinct kind of noun.一种独特名词的证据。
Cognition. 1994 Mar;51(3):267-84. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90056-6.
10
Dissociation of lexical syntax and semantics: evidence from focal cortical degeneration.词汇句法与语义的分离:来自局灶性皮质变性的证据。
Neurocase. 2004 Oct;10(5):353-62. doi: 10.1080/13554790490892248.