Suppr超能文献

比较药物治疗和心理治疗联合治疗儿童和青少年抑郁障碍的短期疗效和可接受性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparative short-term efficacy and acceptability of a combination of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1 Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.

NHC Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment on Brain Functional Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 22;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03760-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the clinical efficacy and safety of combination of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in the treatment of depressive disorders in children and adolescents have been studied, the results remain controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to study the short-term efficacy and acceptability of combined therapy for children and adolescents with depressive disorders.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in multiple databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), up to 31 December 2020, that assessed the combination of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy against other active treatment options (pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy and placebo combined psychotherapy) in children and adolescents ( ≤ 18 years old) with depressive disorder. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020196701).

RESULTS

A total of 14 RCTs involving 1,325 patients were included. For the primary and secondary outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences between the compared interventions in terms of remission (odds ratios [OR] = 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93 to 2.04), acceptability (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.38), efficacy (standardised mean differences = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.19), and suicidality (OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 0.67 to 2.06). Limited evidence showed that the combination of fluoxetine (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.10 to 3.29) or non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (non-SSRI) (OR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.06 to 5.72) with cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) was superior to other active treatment options. Most included trials were rated as 'some concerns' in terms of risk of bias assessment.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence from the limited available data that all combined therapies are superior to other active treatment options for the acute treatment of depressive disorder in children and adolescents. However, it showed that fluoxetine or non-SSRI pharmacotherapies combined with CBT might be superior to other therapies in short-term. Mixed characteristics (e.g. age) and small sample size of non-SSRI combined therapy may influence the generalisability of the results.

摘要

背景

虽然药物治疗联合心理治疗在儿童和青少年抑郁障碍治疗中的临床疗效和安全性已得到研究,但结果仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在研究联合治疗对儿童和青少年抑郁障碍的短期疗效和可接受性。

方法

我们在多个数据库中进行了系统检索,以确定截至 2020 年 12 月 31 日评估药物治疗联合心理治疗与其他活性治疗(药物治疗、心理治疗和联合心理治疗的安慰剂)比较的随机对照试验(RCT),纳入年龄在 18 岁及以下的患有抑郁障碍的儿童和青少年。本研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020196701)注册。

结果

共纳入 14 项 RCT 涉及 1325 名患者。对于主要和次要结局,在缓解方面,比较干预措施之间没有统计学上的显著差异(比值比[OR] = 1.37;95%置信区间[CI]:0.93 至 2.04)、可接受性(OR = 0.99;95% CI:0.72 至 1.38)、疗效(标准化均数差 = -0.07;95% CI:-0.32 至 0.19)和自杀意念(OR = 1.17;95% CI:0.67 至 2.06)。有限的证据表明,氟西汀(OR = 1.90,95% CI:1.10 至 3.29)或非选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(非 SSRI)(OR = 2.46,95% CI:1.06 至 5.72)与认知行为治疗(CBT)联合优于其他活性治疗。大多数纳入的试验在偏倚风险评估方面被评为“存在一些关注”。

结论

从有限的可用数据中没有证据表明,所有联合治疗在儿童和青少年抑郁障碍的急性治疗中均优于其他活性治疗。然而,它表明氟西汀或非 SSRI 药物联合 CBT 可能在短期治疗中优于其他疗法。非 SSRI 联合治疗的混合特征(例如年龄)和小样本量可能会影响结果的普遍性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验