Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Faculty of Dentistry, Egyptian Russian University, Badr, Egypt.
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Faculty of Dentistry, Egyptian Russian University, Badr, Egypt, Phone: +201099296591, e-mail:
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Oct 1;22(10):1087-1097.
This study was conducted to evaluate the marginal adaptation, marginal staining, and postoperative sensitivity of resin composite restorations after disinfection of class II cavities with NanoCare Gold and chlorhexidine in class II cavities immediately, after 6 months, 1, and 2 years using World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria for assessment of dental restorations.
In this study, 19 participants were recruited, 3 carious lesions in each one. After preparation of these lesions, they were randomly allocated into three parallel groups according to the disinfection protocol. The first group was for NanoCare Gold, the second was for chlorhexidine, and the third was for the control. The three groups were evaluated clinically and radiographically using (FDI) criteria at different intervals till 2 years of clinical service.
There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, arch, and tooth type distribution among study groups. Regarding marginal adaptation, there was no statistically significant difference among the different groups but the difference was only statistically significant within each group after 2 years. Regarding the marginal staining, the difference was only significant between the NanoCare and the other groups after 2 years. In case of postoperative sensitivity, there was no statistically significant difference among the different groups and within each one at different intervals.
NanoCare Gold could be promising in durability preservation of direct tooth-colored restorations. Marginal staining and postoperative sensitivity are regulated by other factors than surface pretreatment.
As long as restorations are inserted under rubber dam isolation, proper application steps, proper filling, and adequate finishing and polishing, the performance of the restorations would be satisfactory up to 1 year without any surface disinfection. However, after a longer follow-up, some changes may be noticed. NanoCare Gold and chlorhexidine are accepted as a cavity disinfectant without any negative effect on marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations.
本研究旨在使用世界牙科联合会(FDI)评估牙科修复体的标准,评估在第二类腔中使用 NanoCare Gold 和洗必泰对第二类腔进行即时、6 个月后、1 年和 2 年后的边缘适应性、边缘染色和术后敏感性。
在这项研究中,招募了 19 名参与者,每个参与者有 3 个龋齿病变。在这些病变的制备后,根据消毒方案将它们随机分配到三个平行组中。第一组为 NanoCare Gold,第二组为洗必泰,第三组为对照组。在不同的时间间隔内,使用(FDI)标准对三组进行临床和放射学评估,直至 2 年的临床服务。
在研究组中,年龄、性别、弓和牙齿类型分布没有统计学上的显著差异。关于边缘适应性,各组之间没有统计学上的显著差异,但在 2 年后仅在每个组内有统计学上的显著差异。关于边缘染色,只有在 2 年后 NanoCare 和其他组之间有显著差异。在术后敏感性方面,各组之间和每个组在不同时间间隔内均无统计学差异。
NanoCare Gold 可以在直接牙齿颜色修复体的耐久性保存方面有前途。边缘染色和术后敏感性受表面预处理以外的其他因素调节。
只要在橡皮障隔离下插入修复体,正确的应用步骤、适当的填充、充分的修整和抛光,在没有任何表面消毒的情况下,修复体的性能在 1 年内会令人满意。然而,在更长的随访期后,可能会注意到一些变化。NanoCare Gold 和洗必泰被接受为腔消毒剂,对树脂复合材料修复体的边缘适应性没有任何负面影响。