Suppr超能文献

虚拟指导系统电子健康干预的评估:荷兰的一项混合方法观察性队列研究。

Evaluation of a virtual coaching system eHealth intervention: A mixed methods observational cohort study in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Hurmuz Marian Z M, Jansen-Kosterink Stephanie M, Beinema Tessa, Fischer Katrien, Op den Akker Harm, Hermens Hermie J

机构信息

Roessingh Research and Development, eHealth department, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, 7522, AH, Enschede, the Netherlands.

University of Twente, Biomedical Signal and Systems group, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522, NB, Enschede, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2022 Feb 5;27:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100501. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the rise in human life expectancy, the prevalence of chronic disease has increased significantly. Adopting a healthy lifestyle can decrease the risk of chronic disease. Virtual coaching systems can help older adults adopt a healthy lifestyle.AimThe primary objective of this study was to assess the use, user experience and potential health effects of a conversational agent-based eHealth platform (Council of Coaches) implemented in a real-world setting among older adults.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was conducted with older adults aged 55 years or older in the Netherlands. Participants were enrolled for 5-9 weeks during which they had access to Council of Coaches. They completed three questionnaires: pre-test, post-test, and at follow-up. After five weeks, an interview was conducted, and participants chose whether they wanted to use the eHealth intervention for another four weeks during the facultative phase.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 51 older adults (70.6% female) with a mean age of 65.3 years (SD = 7.4). Of these, 94.1% started interacting with Council of Coaches, and most participants interacted once per week. During the facultative phase, 21 participants were still interacting with Council of Coaches. Minimal clinical important differences in quality of life were found among the study population after interacting with Council of Coaches.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that eHealth interventions with virtual coaching can be used among older adults. This may increase quality of life for older adults, and decrease their healthcare needs. Future research into such eHealth interventions should take into account the inclusion of sufficient personalised content and the use of a mixed methods study for assessing the eHealth intervention.

摘要

背景

随着人类预期寿命的增加,慢性病的患病率显著上升。采用健康的生活方式可以降低患慢性病的风险。虚拟教练系统可以帮助老年人采用健康的生活方式。

目的

本研究的主要目的是评估在现实环境中针对老年人实施的基于对话代理的电子健康平台(教练委员会)的使用情况、用户体验和潜在健康影响。

方法

在荷兰对55岁及以上的老年人进行了一项观察性队列研究。参与者登记参加5至9周,在此期间他们可以使用教练委员会。他们完成了三份问卷:测试前、测试后和随访时。五周后,进行了一次访谈,参与者选择在可选阶段是否想再使用四周的电子健康干预措施。

结果

研究人群包括51名老年人(70.6%为女性),平均年龄为65.3岁(标准差=7.4)。其中,94.1%的人开始与教练委员会互动,大多数参与者每周互动一次。在可选阶段,21名参与者仍在与教练委员会互动。与教练委员会互动后,研究人群中生活质量的最小临床重要差异被发现。

结论

我们的结果表明,带有虚拟教练的电子健康干预措施可以在老年人中使用。这可能会提高老年人的生活质量,并减少他们的医疗保健需求。未来对此类电子健康干预措施的研究应考虑纳入足够的个性化内容,并使用混合方法研究来评估电子健康干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a38b/8844700/f915770c86a2/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a virtual coaching system eHealth intervention: A mixed methods observational cohort study in the Netherlands.
Internet Interv. 2022 Feb 5;27:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100501. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
The implementation of the coaching on lifestyle (CooL) intervention: lessons learnt.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 14;19(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4457-7.
8
Effects of an eHealth literacy intervention for older adults.
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 3;13(4):e90. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1880.
9
Needs, barriers and facilitators of older adults towards eHealth in general practice: a qualitative study.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Dec 2;21:e54. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000547.
10
Results of MyPlan 2.0 on Physical Activity in Older Belgian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 7;21(10):e13219. doi: 10.2196/13219.

引用本文的文献

2
Participatory design and evaluation of digital coaching for improving health-the star multicomponent lifestyle intervention.
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 3;7:1600535. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1600535. eCollection 2025.
4
Current status of older people with chronic diseases adopting digital health technologies: A scoping review.
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 4;11:20552076251348578. doi: 10.1177/20552076251348578. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Roles, Users, Benefits, and Limitations of Chatbots in Health Care: Rapid Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 23;26:e56930. doi: 10.2196/56930.
10
Rapid Review on the Concept of Positive Health and Its Implementation in Practice.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 16;12(6):671. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060671.

本文引用的文献

1
Coaching Through Technology: A Systematic Review into Efficacy and Effectiveness for the Ageing Population.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 15;17(16):5930. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165930.
4
Assessing usability of eHealth technology: A comparison of usability benchmarking instruments.
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Aug;128:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 5.
5
The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for a falls intervention in Parkinson's: A delphi study.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019 Apr;61:106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for the promotion of physical activity in older adults: A systematic review.
Prev Med. 2018 Mar;108:93-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.026. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
8
Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life-a systematic review.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验