Shucard Hannah, Muller Emily, Johnson Joslyn, Walker Jan, Elmore Joann G, Payne Thomas H, Berman Jacob, Jackson Sara L
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 17;9:23333928221080336. doi: 10.1177/23333928221080336. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: We examined an initial step towards co-generation of clinic notes by inviting patients to complete a pre-visit questionnaire that could be inserted into clinic notes by providers and describe the experience in a safety-net and non-safety-net clinic.
We sent an electronic pre-visit questionnaire on visit goals and interim history to patients at a safety-net clinic and a non-safety-net clinic before clinic visits. We compared questionnaire utilization between clinics during a one-year period and performed a chart review of a sample of patients to examine demographics, content and usage of patient responses to the questionnaire.
While use was low in both clinics, it was lower in the safety-net clinic (3%) compared to the non-safety-net clinic (10%). We reviewed a sample of respondents and found they were more likely to be White compared to the overall clinic populations ( < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in patient-typed notes (word count and number of visit goals) between the safety-net and non-safety-net samples however, patients at the safety-net clinic were less likely to have all of their goals addressed within the PCP documentation, compared to the non-safety-net clinic.
Given potential benefits of this questionnaire as a communication tool, addressing barriers to use of technology among vulnerable patients is needed, including access to devices and internet, and support from caregivers or culturally concordant peer navigators.
引言/目的:我们通过邀请患者填写一份就诊前问卷来研究临床记录联合生成的初步步骤,该问卷可由医护人员插入临床记录中,并描述在安全网诊所和非安全网诊所的实施情况。
我们在就诊前向一家安全网诊所和一家非安全网诊所的患者发送了一份关于就诊目标和病史的电子就诊前问卷。我们比较了两家诊所在一年期间问卷使用率,并对部分患者样本进行病历审查,以检查患者对问卷回答的人口统计学特征、内容和使用情况。
两家诊所的问卷使用率都较低,安全网诊所(3%)低于非安全网诊所(10%)。我们审查了部分受访者样本,发现与整个诊所人群相比,他们更可能是白人(<0.05)。安全网诊所和非安全网诊所样本在患者填写的记录(字数和就诊目标数量)方面没有统计学显著差异,然而,与非安全网诊所相比,安全网诊所的患者在初级保健医生记录中所有目标得到解决的可能性较小。
鉴于该问卷作为沟通工具的潜在益处,需要解决弱势患者在使用技术方面的障碍,包括获取设备和互联网,以及获得护理人员或文化背景相符的同伴导航员的支持。