• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一份用于征集患者就诊目标和既往病史的电子就诊前问卷的临床应用:安全网诊所与非安全网诊所的回顾性比较

Clinical Use of an Electronic Pre-Visit Questionnaire Soliciting Patient Visit Goals and Interim History: A Retrospective Comparison Between Safety-net and Non-Safety-net Clinics.

作者信息

Shucard Hannah, Muller Emily, Johnson Joslyn, Walker Jan, Elmore Joann G, Payne Thomas H, Berman Jacob, Jackson Sara L

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 17;9:23333928221080336. doi: 10.1177/23333928221080336. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/23333928221080336
PMID:35198655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8859650/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: We examined an initial step towards co-generation of clinic notes by inviting patients to complete a pre-visit questionnaire that could be inserted into clinic notes by providers and describe the experience in a safety-net and non-safety-net clinic.

METHODS

We sent an electronic pre-visit questionnaire on visit goals and interim history to patients at a safety-net clinic and a non-safety-net clinic before clinic visits. We compared questionnaire utilization between clinics during a one-year period and performed a chart review of a sample of patients to examine demographics, content and usage of patient responses to the questionnaire.

RESULTS

While use was low in both clinics, it was lower in the safety-net clinic (3%) compared to the non-safety-net clinic (10%). We reviewed a sample of respondents and found they were more likely to be White compared to the overall clinic populations ( < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in patient-typed notes (word count and number of visit goals) between the safety-net and non-safety-net samples however, patients at the safety-net clinic were less likely to have all of their goals addressed within the PCP documentation, compared to the non-safety-net clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

Given potential benefits of this questionnaire as a communication tool, addressing barriers to use of technology among vulnerable patients is needed, including access to devices and internet, and support from caregivers or culturally concordant peer navigators.

摘要

引言/目的:我们通过邀请患者填写一份就诊前问卷来研究临床记录联合生成的初步步骤,该问卷可由医护人员插入临床记录中,并描述在安全网诊所和非安全网诊所的实施情况。

方法

我们在就诊前向一家安全网诊所和一家非安全网诊所的患者发送了一份关于就诊目标和病史的电子就诊前问卷。我们比较了两家诊所在一年期间问卷使用率,并对部分患者样本进行病历审查,以检查患者对问卷回答的人口统计学特征、内容和使用情况。

结果

两家诊所的问卷使用率都较低,安全网诊所(3%)低于非安全网诊所(10%)。我们审查了部分受访者样本,发现与整个诊所人群相比,他们更可能是白人(<0.05)。安全网诊所和非安全网诊所样本在患者填写的记录(字数和就诊目标数量)方面没有统计学显著差异,然而,与非安全网诊所相比,安全网诊所的患者在初级保健医生记录中所有目标得到解决的可能性较小。

结论

鉴于该问卷作为沟通工具的潜在益处,需要解决弱势患者在使用技术方面的障碍,包括获取设备和互联网,以及获得护理人员或文化背景相符的同伴导航员的支持。

相似文献

1
Clinical Use of an Electronic Pre-Visit Questionnaire Soliciting Patient Visit Goals and Interim History: A Retrospective Comparison Between Safety-net and Non-Safety-net Clinics.一份用于征集患者就诊目标和既往病史的电子就诊前问卷的临床应用:安全网诊所与非安全网诊所的回顾性比较
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 17;9:23333928221080336. doi: 10.1177/23333928221080336. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
Patients' perceptions of their doctors' notes and after-visit summaries: A mixed methods study of patients at safety-net clinics.患者对医生笔记和就诊后小结的看法:以安全网诊所的患者为对象的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Apr;21(2):485-493. doi: 10.1111/hex.12641. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
3
Patients who share transparent visit notes with others: characteristics, risks, and benefits.与他人分享透明就诊记录的患者:特征、风险与益处。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 12;16(11):e247. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3363.
4
The Affordable Care Act Decreased the Proportion of Uninsured Patients in a Safety Net Orthopaedic Clinic.平价医疗法案降低了一家骨科医保诊所中无保险患者的比例。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 May;476(5):925-931. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000078.
5
Patient Access to Online Visit Notes: Perceptions of Doctors and Patients at an Urban HIV/AIDS Clinic.患者获取在线就诊记录:城市艾滋病诊所中医生与患者的看法
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2015 Jul-Aug;14(4):306-12. doi: 10.1177/2325957414526783. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
6
Barriers and Facilitators to Online Portal Use Among Patients and Caregivers in a Safety Net Health Care System: A Qualitative Study.安全网医疗系统中患者及照护者使用在线门户的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 3;17(12):e275. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4847.
7
An Untapped Potential in Primary Care: Semi-Structured Interviews with Clinicians on How Patient Portals Will Work for Caregivers in the Safety Net.初级保健中的未开发潜力:与临床医生进行半结构化访谈,了解患者门户如何为安全网中的护理人员提供服务。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e18466. doi: 10.2196/18466.
8
Patients Contributing to Visit Notes: Mixed Methods Evaluation of OurNotes.患者参与就诊记录:OurNotes 的混合方法评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 8;23(11):e29951. doi: 10.2196/29951.
9
Ophthalmology patients' interest in online access to clinic notes at three US clinics.美国三家诊所的眼科患者对在线获取病历的兴趣。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Jul;37(4):420-427. doi: 10.1111/opo.12367. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
10
Disparities in Patient-Reported Interest in Web-Based Patient Portals: Survey at an Urban Academic Safety-Net Hospital.患者报告的对基于网络的患者门户的兴趣差异:在一家城市学术安全网医院进行的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 26;21(3):e11421. doi: 10.2196/11421.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying, Engaging, and Supporting Care Partners in Clinical Settings: Protocol for a Patient Portal-Based Intervention.在临床环境中识别、吸引和支持护理伙伴:基于患者门户网站干预的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 4;14:e66708. doi: 10.2196/66708.
2
Neurological history both twinned and queried by generative artificial intelligence.由生成式人工智能孪生并质疑的神经病史。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 17;11:1496866. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1496866. eCollection 2024.
3
Do patients who read visit notes on the patient portal have a higher rate of "loop closure" on diagnostic tests and referrals in primary care? A retrospective cohort study.在初级保健中,阅读患者门户网站上就诊记录的患者在诊断检查和转诊方面的“闭环”率是否更高?一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):622-630. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad250.
4
Partnering with Patients and Families to Improve Diagnostic Safety through the OurDX Tool: Effects of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Preference.通过 OurDX 工具与患者及其家属合作,提高诊断安全性:种族、民族和语言偏好的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):903-912. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776055. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
5
The Changing Tasks of Medicine and Dermatology in the Twenty-First Century: The Need for Improved Information Capture Tools and Processes.21世纪医学与皮肤病学任务的转变:对改进信息获取工具和流程的需求。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Nov;13(11):2479-2486. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01046-3. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
6
Improving emotional and psychosexual well-being screening in women living with polycystic ovary syndrome: experiences from the United Kingdom and India.改善多囊卵巢综合征女性的情绪和性心理健康筛查:来自英国和印度的经验。
Endocr Connect. 2023 Sep 27;12(11). doi: 10.1530/EC-23-0179. Print 2023 Nov 1.
7
The Voice of the Patient and the Electronic Health Record.患者之声与电子健康记录。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):254-257. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767685. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
8
Partnering with patients and families living with chronic conditions to coproduce diagnostic safety through OurDX: a previsit online engagement tool.与患有慢性疾病的患者和家属合作,通过 OurDX 共同创建诊断安全:一种预先在线参与工具。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):692-702. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad003.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients Contributing to Visit Notes: Mixed Methods Evaluation of OurNotes.患者参与就诊记录:OurNotes 的混合方法评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 8;23(11):e29951. doi: 10.2196/29951.
2
Capturing the Impact of Patient Portals Based on the Quadruple Aim and Benefits Evaluation Frameworks: Scoping Review.基于四重目标和效益评估框架捕捉患者门户的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 8;22(12):e24568. doi: 10.2196/24568.
3
The Pandemic of Health Care Inequity.医疗保健不平等的大流行。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2021767. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21767.
4
Frequency and Types of Patient-Reported Errors in Electronic Health Record Ambulatory Care Notes.电子健康记录门诊护理记录中患者报告错误的频率和类型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205867. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5867.
5
Embracing the new age of transparency: mental health patients reading their psychotherapy notes online.拥抱新时代的透明性:心理健康患者在线阅读他们的心理治疗记录。
J Ment Health. 2019 Oct;28(5):527-535. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1644490. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Health Information-seeking Behaviors and Preferences of a Diverse, Multilingual Urban Cohort.多元化、多语言城市人群的健康信息搜索行为和偏好。
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 6 2):S176-S183. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001050.
7
OpenNotes After 7 Years: Patient Experiences With Ongoing Access to Their Clinicians' Outpatient Visit Notes.7年后的开放病历:患者持续获取临床医生门诊病历记录的体验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 6;21(5):e13876. doi: 10.2196/13876.
8
Assessment of US Hospital Compliance With Regulations for Patients' Requests for Medical Records.评估美国医院对患者查阅病历要求的法规遵守情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183014. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3014.
9
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Patients' Perceptions of the Patient Portal Experience with OpenNotes.患者对开放医嘱患者门户体验的定性和定量分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):10-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676588. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Consumer Health Informatics Adoption among Underserved Populations: Thinking beyond the Digital Divide.弱势群体对消费者健康信息学的应用:超越数字鸿沟的思考
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):146-155. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641217. Epub 2018 Aug 29.