• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Partnering with patients and families living with chronic conditions to coproduce diagnostic safety through OurDX: a previsit online engagement tool.与患有慢性疾病的患者和家属合作,通过 OurDX 共同创建诊断安全:一种预先在线参与工具。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):692-702. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad003.
2
Patient and family contributions to improve the diagnostic process through the OurDX electronic health record tool: a mixed method analysis.患者和家属通过 OurDX 电子健康记录工具为改善诊断过程做出的贡献:混合方法分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Aug 16;33(9):597-608. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015793.
3
Partnering with Patients and Families to Improve Diagnostic Safety through the OurDX Tool: Effects of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Preference.通过 OurDX 工具与患者及其家属合作,提高诊断安全性:种族、民族和语言偏好的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):903-912. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776055. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
4
Patient Identification of Diagnostic Safety Blindspots and Participation in "Good Catches" Through Shared Visit Notes.通过共享就诊记录,患者识别诊断安全盲点并参与“良好发现”。
Milbank Q. 2022 Dec;100(4):1121-1165. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12593. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
5
A patient and family reporting system for perceived ambulatory note mistakes: experience at 3 U.S. healthcare centers.患者和家属报告系统感知门诊记录错误:3 家美国医疗机构的经验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1566-1573. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz142.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes.通过对在线就诊记录进行结构化评估,邀请患者识别诊断问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 May 11;29(6):1091-1100. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac036.
8
What's going well: a qualitative analysis of positive patient and family feedback in the context of the diagnostic process.顺利的方面:在诊断过程中对患者和家属积极反馈的定性分析。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Dec 20;11(1):63-72. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0075. eCollection 2024 Feb 1.
9
Frequency and Types of Patient-Reported Errors in Electronic Health Record Ambulatory Care Notes.电子健康记录门诊护理记录中患者报告错误的频率和类型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205867. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5867.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic scope: the AI can't see what the mind doesn't know.诊断范围:人工智能无法察觉思维未知之事。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Dec 4;12(2):189-196. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0151. eCollection 2025 May 1.
2
Understanding experiences, unmet needs and priorities related to post-stroke aphasia care: stage one of an experience-based co-design project.理解与卒中后失语症护理相关的体验、未满足的需求和重点:基于体验的共同设计项目的第一阶段。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 20;14(5):e081680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081680.
3
Partnering with Patients and Families to Improve Diagnostic Safety through the OurDX Tool: Effects of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Preference.通过 OurDX 工具与患者及其家属合作,提高诊断安全性:种族、民族和语言偏好的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):903-912. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776055. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
4
Patient and family contributions to improve the diagnostic process through the OurDX electronic health record tool: a mixed method analysis.患者和家属通过 OurDX 电子健康记录工具为改善诊断过程做出的贡献:混合方法分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Aug 16;33(9):597-608. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015793.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Identification of Diagnostic Safety Blindspots and Participation in "Good Catches" Through Shared Visit Notes.通过共享就诊记录,患者识别诊断安全盲点并参与“良好发现”。
Milbank Q. 2022 Dec;100(4):1121-1165. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12593. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
2
Delayed diagnosis of serious paediatric conditions in 13 regional emergency departments.13 个地区急诊部严重儿科疾病的延迟诊断。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Apr 24;33(5):293-300. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015314.
3
Measuring Performance of the Diagnostic Process.衡量诊断过程的性能。
JAMA. 2022 Jul 12;328(2):143-144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10166.
4
Metric Myopia - Trading Away Our Clinical Judgment.计量近视——摒弃我们的临床判断力
N Engl J Med. 2022 May 5;386(18):1759-1763. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms2200977. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes.通过对在线就诊记录进行结构化评估,邀请患者识别诊断问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 May 11;29(6):1091-1100. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac036.
6
Understanding and Communicating Uncertainty in Achieving Diagnostic Excellence.在实现卓越诊断中理解和传达不确定性
JAMA. 2022 Mar 22;327(12):1127-1128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.2141.
7
Clinical Use of an Electronic Pre-Visit Questionnaire Soliciting Patient Visit Goals and Interim History: A Retrospective Comparison Between Safety-net and Non-Safety-net Clinics.一份用于征集患者就诊目标和既往病史的电子就诊前问卷的临床应用:安全网诊所与非安全网诊所的回顾性比较
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 17;9:23333928221080336. doi: 10.1177/23333928221080336. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
Patient characteristics and utilization of an online patient portal in a rural academic general internal medicine practice.患者特征及农村学术性普通内科医疗实践中在线患者门户的使用情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Feb 16;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01778-w.
9
Diagnostic error experiences of patients and families with limited English-language health literacy or disadvantaged socioeconomic position in a cross-sectional US population-based survey.在美国一项基于人群的横断面调查中,英语健康素养有限或社会经济地位不利的患者及家庭的诊断错误经历。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Nov;32(11):644-654. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013937. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
10
Patients Contributing to Visit Notes: Mixed Methods Evaluation of OurNotes.患者参与就诊记录:OurNotes 的混合方法评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 8;23(11):e29951. doi: 10.2196/29951.

与患有慢性疾病的患者和家属合作,通过 OurDX 共同创建诊断安全:一种预先在线参与工具。

Partnering with patients and families living with chronic conditions to coproduce diagnostic safety through OurDX: a previsit online engagement tool.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):692-702. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad003.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocad003
PMID:36692204
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10018262/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients and families are key partners in diagnosis, but methods to routinely engage them in diagnostic safety are lacking. Policy mandating patient access to electronic health information presents new opportunities. We tested a new online tool ("OurDX") that was codesigned with patients and families, to determine the types and frequencies of potential safety issues identified by patients/families with chronic health conditions and whether their contributions were integrated into the visit note.

METHODS

Patients/families at 2 US healthcare sites were invited to contribute, through an online previsit survey: (1) visit priorities, (2) recent medical history/symptoms, and (3) potential diagnostic concerns. Two physicians reviewed patient-reported diagnostic concerns to verify and categorize diagnostic safety opportunities (DSOs). We conducted a chart review to determine whether patient contributions were integrated into the note. We used descriptive statistics to report implementation outcomes, verification of DSOs, and chart review findings.

RESULTS

Participants completed OurDX reports in 7075 of 18 129 (39%) eligible pediatric subspecialty visits (site 1), and 460 of 706 (65%) eligible adult primary care visits (site 2). Among patients reporting diagnostic concerns, 63% were verified as probable DSOs. In total, probable DSOs were identified by 7.5% of pediatric and adult patients/families with underlying health conditions, respectively. The most common types of DSOs were patients/families not feeling heard; problems/delays with tests or referrals; and problems/delays with explanation or next steps. In chart review, most clinician notes included all or some patient/family priorities and patient-reported histories.

CONCLUSIONS

OurDX can help engage patients and families living with chronic health conditions in diagnosis. Participating patients/families identified DSOs and most of their OurDX contributions were included in the visit note.

摘要

目的

患者及其家属是诊断过程中的重要伙伴,但目前缺乏能让他们常规参与诊断安全工作的方法。而要求患者获取电子健康信息的政策则带来了新的机会。我们测试了一种新的在线工具(“OurDX”),它是与患者及其家属共同设计的,旨在确定患有慢性疾病的患者/家属可能发现的安全问题的类型和频率,以及他们的意见是否被纳入就诊记录。

方法

邀请美国 2 个医疗地点的患者/家属通过在线就诊前调查来提供信息:(1)就诊重点,(2)近期病史/症状,以及(3)潜在的诊断问题。两名医生审查患者报告的诊断问题,以验证并分类诊断安全机会(DSO)。我们进行了病历回顾,以确定患者的意见是否被纳入记录。我们使用描述性统计来报告实施结果、验证 DSO 和病历回顾结果。

结果

在儿科专科就诊中,18129 名符合条件的患者中有 7075 名(39%)完成了 OurDX 报告(地点 1),706 名符合条件的成年患者中有 460 名(65%)完成了 OurDX 报告(地点 2)。在报告诊断问题的患者中,有 63%被确认为可能的 DSO。在儿科和成年患者/家属中,分别有 7.5%和 6.5%存在潜在健康问题的患者/家属报告了可能的 DSO。最常见的 DSO 类型是患者/家属感觉未被倾听;检查或转诊存在问题/延误;以及解释或后续步骤存在问题/延误。在病历回顾中,大多数临床医生的记录都包含了所有或部分患者/家属的重点和患者报告的病史。

结论

OurDX 可以帮助患有慢性疾病的患者及其家属参与诊断。参与的患者/家属确定了 DSO,他们的大多数 OurDX 意见都被纳入了就诊记录。