• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由生成式人工智能孪生并质疑的神经病史。

Neurological history both twinned and queried by generative artificial intelligence.

作者信息

Lee Jung-Hyun, Choi Eunhee, Angulo Sergio L, McDougal Robert A, Lytton William W

机构信息

Department of Neurology, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, United States.

Department of Neurology, Kings County Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 17;11:1496866. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1496866. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1496866
PMID:39895821
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11782252/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We propose the use of GPT-4 to facilitate initial history-taking in neurology and other medical specialties. A large language model (LLM) could be utilized as a digital twin which could enhance queryable electronic medical record (EMR) systems and provide healthcare conversational agents (HCAs) to replace waiting-room questionnaires.

METHODS

In this observational pilot study, we presented verbatim history of present illness (HPI) narratives from published case reports of headache, stroke, and neurodegenerative diseases. Three standard GPT-4 models were designated Models : patient digital twin; : neurologist to query Model P; and : supervisor to synthesize the N-P dialogue into a derived HPI and formulate the differential diagnosis. Given the random variability of GPT-4 output, each case was presented five separate times to check consistency and reliability.

RESULTS

The study achieved an overall HPI content retrieval accuracy of 81%, with accuracies of 84% for headache, 82% for stroke, and 77% for neurodegenerative diseases. Retrieval accuracies for individual HPI components were as follows: 93% for chief complaints, 47% for associated symptoms and review of systems, 76% for relevant symptom details, and 94% for histories of past medical, surgical, allergies, social, and family factors. The ranking of case diagnoses in the differential diagnosis list averaged in the 89th percentile.

DISCUSSION

Our tripartite LLM model demonstrated accuracy in extracting essential information from published case reports. Further validation with EMR HPIs, and then with direct patient care will be needed to move toward adaptation of enhanced diagnostic digital twins that incorporate real-time data from health-monitoring devices and self-monitoring assessments.

摘要

背景与目的

我们建议使用GPT-4来促进神经病学和其他医学专业的初步病史采集。大语言模型(LLM)可作为数字孪生体使用,它可以增强可查询的电子病历(EMR)系统,并提供医疗对话代理(HCA)来取代候诊室问卷。

方法

在这项观察性试点研究中,我们逐字呈现了来自已发表的头痛、中风和神经退行性疾病病例报告中的现病史(HPI)叙述。指定了三个标准的GPT-4模型:模型P:患者数字孪生体;模型N:向模型P提问的神经科医生;模型S:将N-P对话综合成派生HPI并制定鉴别诊断的监督者。鉴于GPT-4输出的随机变异性,每个病例分别呈现五次以检查一致性和可靠性。

结果

该研究的总体HPI内容检索准确率为81%,其中头痛的准确率为84%,中风的准确率为82%,神经退行性疾病的准确率为77%。各个HPI组成部分的检索准确率如下:主要症状为93%,相关症状和系统回顾为47%,相关症状细节为76%,既往医疗、手术、过敏、社会和家庭因素史为94%。鉴别诊断列表中的病例诊断排名平均在第89百分位。

讨论

我们的三方LLM模型在从已发表的病例报告中提取基本信息方面表现出准确性。需要通过EMR的HPI进一步验证,然后通过直接的患者护理来推进增强型诊断数字孪生体的应用,该数字孪生体整合了来自健康监测设备和自我监测评估的实时数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7878/11782252/446fa17e2a7b/fmed-11-1496866-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7878/11782252/774ed29ceee0/fmed-11-1496866-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7878/11782252/446fa17e2a7b/fmed-11-1496866-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7878/11782252/774ed29ceee0/fmed-11-1496866-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7878/11782252/446fa17e2a7b/fmed-11-1496866-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Neurological history both twinned and queried by generative artificial intelligence.由生成式人工智能孪生并质疑的神经病史。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 17;11:1496866. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1496866. eCollection 2024.
2
Corrigendum: Neurological history both twinned and queried by generative artificial intelligence.勘误:由生成式人工智能孪生并质疑的神经病史。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 27;12:1619686. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1619686. eCollection 2025.
3
A Large Language Model-Based Generative Natural Language Processing Framework Finetuned on Clinical Notes Accurately Extracts Headache Frequency from Electronic Health Records.一种基于大语言模型的生成式自然语言处理框架,在临床笔记上进行微调后,能准确从电子健康记录中提取头痛频率。
medRxiv. 2023 Oct 3:2023.10.02.23296403. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.02.23296403.
4
Use of ChatGPT Large Language Models to Extract Details of Recommendations for Additional Imaging From Free-Text Impressions of Radiology Reports.使用ChatGPT大型语言模型从放射学报告的自由文本印象中提取额外影像学检查建议的详细信息。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2025 Apr;224(4):e2432341. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.32341. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
A large language model-based generative natural language processing framework fine-tuned on clinical notes accurately extracts headache frequency from electronic health records.基于大型语言模型的生成式自然语言处理框架,在临床笔记上进行了微调,能够从电子健康记录中准确提取头痛频率。
Headache. 2024 Apr;64(4):400-409. doi: 10.1111/head.14702. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
7
Large Language Model Applications for Health Information Extraction in Oncology: Scoping Review.用于肿瘤学健康信息提取的大语言模型应用:范围综述
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 28;11:e65984. doi: 10.2196/65984.
8
Pilot Medical Certification飞行员医学认证
9
The Accuracy and Capability of Artificial Intelligence Solutions in Health Care Examinations and Certificates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.人工智能解决方案在医疗检查和证书中的准确性和能力:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 5;26:e56532. doi: 10.2196/56532.
10
A Language Model-Powered Simulated Patient With Automated Feedback for History Taking: Prospective Study.基于语言模型的模拟患者与自动化反馈的病史采集:前瞻性研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Aug 16;10:e59213. doi: 10.2196/59213.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Neurology, Using Neurologic Localization as an Example.以神经定位为例探索大语言模型在神经病学中的潜力。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Jun;14(3):e200311. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200311. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
GPT-4 Performance for Neurologic Localization.GPT-4在神经定位方面的表现。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Jun;14(3):e200293. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200293. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
Clinical Reasoning of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Model Compared With Physicians.
生成式人工智能模型与医生的临床推理比较
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 May 1;184(5):581-583. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0295.
4
Neurophobia among resident physicians in the emergency service.急诊住院医师的神经恐惧症。
Rev Neurol. 2023 Dec 16;77(12):285-291. doi: 10.33588/rn.7712.2023249.
5
Multimodal treatment, including extracorporeal shock wave therapy, for refractory chronic tension-type headache: a case report.多模态治疗,包括体外冲击波治疗,治疗难治性慢性紧张型头痛:病例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2023 Oct 31;17(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13256-023-04092-9.
6
The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare.对医疗保健领域的大语言模型(或生成式人工智能)进行监管监督的必要性。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jul 6;6(1):120. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00873-0.
7
A Medical Ethics Framework for Conversational Artificial Intelligence.医疗伦理框架下的会话式人工智能
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 26;25:e43068. doi: 10.2196/43068.
8
Digital Tools Designed to Obtain the History of Present Illness From Patients: Scoping Review.数字工具设计用于从患者获取现病史:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 17;24(11):e36074. doi: 10.2196/36074.
9
Obtaining patients' medical history using a digital device prior to consultation in primary care: study protocol for a usability and validity study.在初级保健中使用数字设备获取患者病史:一项可用性和有效性研究的研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01928-0.
10
Clinical Use of an Electronic Pre-Visit Questionnaire Soliciting Patient Visit Goals and Interim History: A Retrospective Comparison Between Safety-net and Non-Safety-net Clinics.一份用于征集患者就诊目标和既往病史的电子就诊前问卷的临床应用:安全网诊所与非安全网诊所的回顾性比较
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 17;9:23333928221080336. doi: 10.1177/23333928221080336. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.