A systematic review of the impacts of oral tetracycline class antibiotics on antimicrobial resistance in normal human flora.

OBJECTIVES

There is interest in doxycycline as prophylaxis against sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but concern about antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We conducted a systematic review (CRD42021273301) of the impact of oral tetracycline-class antibiotics on AMR in normal flora.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (1940-2021) and conference proceedings (2014-21) for randomized controlled trials in adults comparing daily oral tetracycline-class antibiotics to non-tetracycline controls. The primary outcome was AMR to tetracyclines; secondary outcomes included resistance to non-tetracyclines. Data were inappropriate for meta-analysis, so we analysed findings descriptively.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 6265 abstracts of which 7 articles fulfilled inclusion criteria. Most were at moderate/high risk of bias, generally due to inadequate methodologic reporting. Studies used doxycycline, tetracycline, oxytetracycline or minocycline for 2-18 weeks. Most observed an increased burden of tetracycline resistance, including in subgingival (= 3 studies), gastrointestinal (= 2) and upper respiratory tract (= 1) flora; one study of skin flora found no change in tetracycline-resistant species after 18 weeks of oxytetracycline/minocycline. Four studies reassessed AMR at 2-50 weeks post-intervention and reported varying degrees of resistance. Three articles reported on the prevalence of non-tetracycline AMR after doxycycline prophylaxis, of which one found a transient increase among gastrointestinal ; the other two showed no difference from control.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the effects are modest and transient, limited data from small prospective studies may suggest that oral tetracyclines for 2-18 weeks increase resistance in subgingival, gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tract flora. STI prophylaxis trials should include AMR in commensal bacteria as study outcomes.