Nakao Masayuki, Oikado Katsunori, Sato Yoshinao, Hashimoto Kohei, Ichinose Junji, Matsuura Yosuke, Okumura Sakae, Ninomiya Hironori, Mun Mingyon
Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, The Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, The Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 Jan 21;3(2):100279. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100279. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Although several studies have investigated the prognostic significance of the radiographic appearance of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, the prognostic impact of solid component size or consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) of part-solid nodules (PSNs) still remains controversial. This study aimed to clarify the combined prognostic impact of the mentioned radiographic features of PSNs and compare it with that of pure solid nodules in the current TNM classification.
We retrospectively investigated 1014 patients with clinical stage IA (TNM eighth edition) adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection. Overall survival (OS) and pathologic characteristics of pure solid nodules, solid-dominant PSNs (CTR > 0.5), and ground-glass opacity (GGO)-dominant PSNs (CTR ≤ 0.5) were compared according to T category.
Patients with pure solid nodules (297 cases) had significantly shorter OS compared with those with PSNs (717 cases) ( < 0.001) but a marginal difference compared with those with solid-dominant PSNs (286 cases) ( = 0.051). No significant difference in OS was found according to T category in those with GGO-dominant PSNs (431 cases). Patients with cT1b and T1c solid-dominant PSNs had significantly worse prognosis compared with those with other PSNs and had comparable prognosis with those with cT1b pure solid nodules ( = 0.892). Higher frequency of nodal and lymphovascular involvement and pathologic upstaging was observed with T category progression in solid-dominant PSNs.
An hierarchy of prognosis and pathologic malignant characteristics was observed according to T category in patients with solid-dominant PSNs but not in those with GGO-dominant PSNs, suggesting the importance of classifying PSNs on the basis of solid component size and CTR for accurate prognostic comparison with pure solid nodules.
尽管多项研究探讨了IA期肺腺癌影像学表现的预后意义,但部分实性结节(PSN)的实性成分大小或实变与肿瘤比例(CTR)对预后的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在阐明上述PSN影像学特征的联合预后影响,并在当前TNM分类中与纯实性结节进行比较。
我们回顾性研究了1014例行根治性切除的临床IA期(TNM第八版)腺癌患者。根据T分期比较纯实性结节、实性为主的PSN(CTR>0.5)和磨玻璃密度影(GGO)为主的PSN(CTR≤0.5)的总生存期(OS)和病理特征。
纯实性结节患者(297例)的OS明显短于PSN患者(717例)(<0.001),但与实性为主的PSN患者(286例)相比差异不显著(=0.051)。GGO为主的PSN患者(431例)中,根据T分期未发现OS有显著差异。cT1b和T1c实性为主的PSN患者的预后明显差于其他PSN患者,且与cT1b纯实性结节患者的预后相当(=0.892)。在实性为主的PSN中,随着T分期进展,淋巴结和脉管侵犯以及病理分期上调的频率更高。
在实性为主的PSN患者中,根据T分期观察到预后和病理恶性特征的层级关系,但在GGO为主的PSN患者中未观察到,这表明根据实性成分大小和CTR对PSN进行分类对于与纯实性结节进行准确的预后比较很重要。