From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (M. Liu, Q.F., M. Li, L.Z.), Department of Pathology (L.Y., X.S.), Medical Statistics Office (X.L.), and Medical Records Room (C.L.), National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China.
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024 Feb;6(1):e220234. doi: 10.1148/ryct.220234.
Purpose To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with atypical solid nodules (ASNs) on thin-section CT images. Materials and Methods Data from patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma who underwent resection between January 2005 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. According to their manifestations on thin-section CT images, nodules were classified as ASNs, subsolid nodules (SSNs), and typical solid nodules (TSNs). The clinicopathologic characteristics of the ASNs were investigated, and the differences across the three groups were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox analysis were used to evaluate survival differences among patients with ASNs, SSNs, and TSNs. Results Of the 254 patients (median age, 58 years [IQR, 53-66]; 152 women) evaluated, 49 had ASNs, 123 had SSNs, and 82 had TSNs. Compared with patients with SSNs, those with ASNs were more likely to have nonsmall adenocarcinoma ( < .001), advanced-stage adenocarcinoma ( = .004), nonlepidic growth adenocarcinoma ( < .001), and middle- or low-grade differentiation tumors ( < .001). Compared with patients with TSNs, those with ASNs were more likely to have no lymph node involvement ( = .009) and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation positivity ( = .018). Average disease-free survival in patients with ASNs was significantly longer than that in patients with TSNs ( < .001) but was not distinguishable from that in patients with SSNs ( = .051). Conclusion ASNs were associated with better clinical outcomes than TSNs in patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinoma, Atypical Solid Nodules, CT, Disease-free Survival, Lung, Prognosis, Pulmonary . Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
评估 CT 图像上表现为不典型实性结节(ASN)的临床ⅠA 期肺腺癌患者的临床病理特征和预后。
回顾性分析 2005 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月期间行手术切除的临床ⅠA 期肺腺癌患者的资料。根据 CT 图像上的表现,结节分为 ASN、亚实性结节(SSN)和典型实性结节(TSN)。研究 ASN 的临床病理特征,并分析三组间的差异。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和多变量 Cox 分析评估 ASN、SSN 和 TSN 患者之间的生存差异。
在 254 例患者(中位年龄,58 岁[IQR,53-66];152 例女性)中,49 例为 ASN,123 例为 SSN,82 例为 TSN。与 SSN 患者相比,ASN 患者更可能为非小细胞腺癌( <.001)、晚期腺癌( =.004)、非贴壁生长腺癌( <.001)和中低分化肿瘤( <.001)。与 TSN 患者相比,ASN 患者更可能无淋巴结受累( =.009)和表皮生长因子受体突变阳性( =.018)。ASN 患者的无病生存时间明显长于 TSN 患者( <.001),但与 SSN 患者无差异( =.051)。
在临床ⅠA 期肺腺癌患者中,与 TSN 相比,ASN 与更好的临床结局相关。