Crabtree Daniel R, Holliday Adrian, Buosi William, Fyfe Claire L, Horgan Graham W, Johnstone Alexandra M
Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness IV2 3JH, UK.
Human Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Jan 30;7(1):16. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7010016.
Proposed strategies for preventing protein deficiencies in older patients include increasing protein intake at breakfast. However, protein is highly satiating and the effects of very high protein intakes at breakfast on subsequent appetite and free-living energy intake (EI) in older adults are unclear. This study compared the acute effects of two breakfast drinks varying in protein and energy contents on appetite and free-living EI in healthy older adults using a randomized 2 × 2 crossover design. Participants ( = 48 (20 men, 28 women); mean ± SD age: 69 ± 3 years; BMI: 22.2 ± 2.0 kg·m; fat-free mass: 45.5 ± 8.0 kg) consumed two drinks for breakfast (high-protein (30.4 ± 5.3 g), low-energy (211.2 ± 37.1 kcal) content (HPLE) and very high-protein (61.8 ± 9.9 g), fed to energy requirements (428.0 ± 68.9 kcal) (VHPER)) one week apart. Appetite perceptions were assessed for 3 h post-drink and free-living EI was measured for the remainder of the day. Appetite was lower in VHPER than HPLE from 30 min onwards ( < 0.01). Free-living energy and protein intake did not differ between conditions ( = 0.814). However, 24 h EI (breakfast drink intake + free-living intake) was greater in VHPER than HPLE (1937 ± 568 kcal vs. 1705 ± 490 kcal; = 0.001), as was 24 h protein intake (123.0 ± 26.0 g vs. 88.6 ± 20.9 g; < 0.001). Consuming a very high-protein breakfast drink acutely suppressed appetite more than a low-energy, high-protein drink in older adults, though free-living EI was unaffected. The long-term effects of adopting such a breakfast strategy in older adults at high risk of energy and protein malnutrition warrants exploration.
预防老年患者蛋白质缺乏的建议策略包括增加早餐时的蛋白质摄入量。然而,蛋白质具有很强的饱腹感,早餐摄入非常高的蛋白质对老年人随后的食欲和自由生活能量摄入量(EI)的影响尚不清楚。本研究采用随机2×2交叉设计,比较了两种蛋白质和能量含量不同的早餐饮料对健康老年人食欲和自由生活EI的急性影响。参与者(n = 48(20名男性,28名女性);平均±标准差年龄:69±3岁;BMI:22.2±2.0 kg·m²;去脂体重:45.5±8.0 kg)早餐时饮用两种饮料(高蛋白(30.4±5.3 g)、低能量(211.2±37.1 kcal)含量(HPLE)和非常高蛋白(61.8±9.9 g)、按能量需求供给(428.0±68.9 kcal)(VHPER)),间隔一周。饮用饮料后3小时评估食欲感知,当天剩余时间测量自由生活EI。从30分钟起,VHPER组的食欲低于HPLE组(P < 0.01)。不同条件下自由生活能量和蛋白质摄入量无差异(P = 0.814)。然而,VHPER组的24小时EI(早餐饮料摄入量+自由生活摄入量)高于HPLE组(1937±568 kcal对1705±490 kcal;P = 0.001),24小时蛋白质摄入量也是如此(123.0±26.0 g对88.6±20.9 g;P < 0.001)。在老年人中,急性饮用非常高蛋白的早餐饮料比低能量、高蛋白饮料更能抑制食欲,尽管自由生活EI不受影响。对于能量和蛋白质营养不良风险较高的老年人采用这种早餐策略的长期影响值得探索。