• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌幸存者的随访护理和二级预防措施模型:循证指南和系统评价。

Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review.

机构信息

Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.

Program in Evidence-Based Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2022 Jan 19;29(2):439-454. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020040.

DOI:10.3390/curroncol29020040
PMID:35200540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8870678/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for preferred models of follow-up care for stage I-IV colorectal (CRC) cancer survivors in Ontario; to identify signs and symptoms of potential recurrence and when to investigate; and to evaluate patient information and support needs during the post-treatment survivorship period.

METHODS

Consistent with the Program in Evidence-Based Medicine's standardized approach, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO databases were systematically searched. The authors drafted recommendations and revised them based on the comments from internal and external reviewers.

RESULTS

Four guidelines, three systematic reviews, three randomized controlled trials, and three cohort studies provided evidence to develop recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Colorectal cancer follow-up care is complex and requires multidisciplinary, coordinated care delivered by the cancer specialist, primary care provider, and allied health professionals. While there is limited evidence to support a shared care model for follow-up, this approach is deemed to be best suited to meet patient needs; however, the roles and responsibilities of care providers need to be clearly defined, and patients need to know when and how to contact them. Although there is insufficient evidence to recommend any individual or combination of signs or symptoms as strong predictor(s) of recurrence, patients should be educated about these and know which care provider to contact if they develop any new or concerning symptoms. Psychosocial support and empathetic, effective, and coordinated communication are most valued by patients for their post-treatment follow-up care. Continuing professional education should emphasize the importance of communication skills and coordination of communication between the patient, family, and healthcare providers.

摘要

目的

为安大略省 I-IV 期结直肠癌(CRC)幸存者提供首选随访护理模式的建议;确定潜在复发的迹象和症状,以及何时进行调查;并评估治疗后生存期间患者的信息和支持需求。

方法

按照循证医学计划的标准化方法,系统地检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 PROSPERO 数据库。作者起草了建议,并根据内部和外部审查员的意见进行了修订。

结果

四项指南、三项系统评价、三项随机对照试验和三项队列研究为制定建议提供了证据。

结论

结直肠癌的随访护理很复杂,需要由癌症专家、初级保健提供者和相关卫生专业人员进行多学科、协调的护理。尽管有有限的证据支持随访的共享护理模式,但这种方法被认为最适合满足患者的需求;然而,护理提供者的角色和责任需要明确界定,患者需要知道何时以及如何联系他们。尽管没有足够的证据推荐任何单一或组合的迹象或症状作为复发的强预测因素,但应教育患者了解这些症状,如果出现任何新的或令人担忧的症状,应知道联系哪位护理提供者。心理社会支持以及富有同情心、有效的、协调的沟通是患者在接受治疗后随访护理时最看重的。继续教育应强调沟通技巧的重要性,并协调患者、家属和医疗保健提供者之间的沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ff/8870678/326e1359ff27/curroncol-29-00040-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ff/8870678/326e1359ff27/curroncol-29-00040-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6ff/8870678/326e1359ff27/curroncol-29-00040-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review.结直肠癌幸存者的随访护理和二级预防措施模型:循证指南和系统评价。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jan 19;29(2):439-454. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020040.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
A literature review of post-treatment survivorship interventions for colorectal cancer survivors and/or their caregivers.对结直肠癌幸存者及其护理人员进行治疗后生存干预的文献综述。
Psychooncology. 2021 Jun;30(6):807-817. doi: 10.1002/pon.5657. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
A systematic review of patient perspectives on surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment.对患者关于结直肠癌治疗后监测观点的系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Oct;11(5):542-552. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0623-2. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
7
Facilitators and barriers to shared primary and specialist cancer care: a systematic review.促进和阻碍初级保健与专科癌症护理共享的因素:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jan;29(1):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05624-5. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
8
Health care provider and patient preparedness for alternative colorectal cancer follow-up; a review.医疗机构和患者对结直肠癌替代随访方案的准备情况综述
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;46(10 Pt A):1779-1788. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.017. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
9
Effectiveness and implementation of models of cancer survivorship care: an overview of systematic reviews.癌症康复护理模式的有效性和实施情况:系统评价概述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Feb;17(1):197-221. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01128-1. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
10
Colorectal cancer survivors' experiences and views of shared and telehealth models of survivorship care: A qualitative study.结直肠癌幸存者对共同和远程医疗生存护理模式的体验和看法:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2024 Jan;33(1):e6265. doi: 10.1002/pon.6265. Epub 2023 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review comparing surveillance recommendations for the detection of recurrence following surgery across 16 common cancer types.一项系统性综述,比较了16种常见癌症类型手术后复发检测的监测建议。
BMJ Oncol. 2025 Mar 7;4(1):e000627. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000627. eCollection 2025.
2
Myths and Presumptions About Cancer Survivorship.关于癌症幸存者的误解与臆断。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 10;42(2):134-139. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00631. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
3
Quality of life and symptom burden after rectal cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial comparing patient-led versus standard follow-up.

本文引用的文献

1
Health care provider and patient preparedness for alternative colorectal cancer follow-up; a review.医疗机构和患者对结直肠癌替代随访方案的准备情况综述
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;46(10 Pt A):1779-1788. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.017. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
2
Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2020.2020 年加拿大癌症预估。
CMAJ. 2020 Mar 2;192(9):E199-E205. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191292.
3
Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.非转移性结直肠癌患者的随访策略
直肠癌手术后的生活质量和症状负担:一项比较患者主导与标准随访的随机对照试验。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Oct;18(5):1709-1722. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01410-4. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):CD002200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002200.pub4.
4
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
5
Patient-Reported Unmet Needs in Colorectal Cancer Survivors After Treatment for Curative Intent.结直肠癌患者经治疗达到治愈意向后的报告性未满足需求
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Jul;62(7):815-822. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001326.
6
Consensus and controversies regarding follow-up after treatment with curative intent of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: a synopsis of guidelines used in countries represented in the European Society of Coloproctology.关于非转移性结直肠癌根治性治疗后随访的共识和争议:欧洲结直肠外科学会成员国指南摘要。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Apr;21(4):392-416. doi: 10.1111/codi.14503. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
7
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colon Cancer, Version 2.2018.NCCN 指南解读:结肠癌,第 2.2018 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Apr;16(4):359-369. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0021.
8
Colorectal cancer patients' preferences for type of caregiver during survivorship care.结直肠癌患者在生存护理期间对护理人员类型的偏好。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Mar;36(1):14-19. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1426141. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
9
Nonphysician Clinicians in the Follow-Up of Resected Patients with Colorectal Cancer.非医师临床医生在结直肠癌切除患者随访中的作用
Dig Dis. 2018;36(1):17-25. doi: 10.1159/000478848. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
10
A systematic review of the supportive care needs of people living with and beyond cancer of the colon and/or rectum.对结肠癌和/或直肠癌患者及其康复期患者支持性护理需求的系统评价。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Aug;29:60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 30.