• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进和阻碍初级保健与专科癌症护理共享的因素:系统评价。

Facilitators and barriers to shared primary and specialist cancer care: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jan;29(1):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05624-5. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-020-05624-5
PMID:32803729
Abstract

PURPOSE

To care for the growing population of cancer survivors, health services worldwide must reconsider how to deliver care to people living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis. Shared care, defined as cancer care that is shared between specialist and primary care providers, is one model that has been investigated; however, practical guidance to support implementation is lacking. This systematic review aimed to explore facilitators and barriers to implementing shared cancer care and to develop practice and policy recommendations to support implementation.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in June 2019 across MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, and PsycINFO databases. Quantitative and qualitative data relevant to the review question were extracted and synthesized following a mixed methods approach.

RESULTS

Thirteen papers were included in the review, 10 qualitative and three quantitative. Included articles were from Australia (n = 8), the USA (n = 3), and one each from the UK and the Netherlands. Sixteen themes were developed under four categories of patient, healthcare professional, process, and policy factors. Key themes included the perceived need for primary care provider training, having clearly defined roles for each healthcare provider, providing general practitioners with diagnostic and treatment summaries, as well as protocols or guidelines for follow-up care, ensuring rapid and accurate communication between providers, utilizing electronic medical records and survivorship care plans as communication tools, and developing consistent policy to reduce fragmentation across services.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations for practice and policy were generated based on review findings that may support broader implementation of shared cancer care.

摘要

目的

为了照顾不断增长的癌症幸存者群体,全球卫生服务机构必须重新考虑如何为癌症诊断后和超越癌症诊断的患者提供护理。共同照护是一种已经被研究过的模式,它被定义为专科医生和初级保健提供者共同提供的癌症护理;然而,缺乏支持实施的实用指南。本系统评价旨在探讨实施共同癌症护理的促进因素和障碍,并制定支持实施的实践和政策建议。

方法

在 2019 年 6 月,我们在 MEDLINE、Embase、Emcare 和 PsycINFO 数据库中进行了系统文献检索。采用混合方法提取和综合与综述问题相关的定量和定性数据。

结果

共纳入了 13 篇文章,10 篇定性研究和 3 篇定量研究。纳入的文章来自澳大利亚(n=8)、美国(n=3),以及英国和荷兰各 1 篇。在四个类别的患者、医疗保健专业人员、过程和政策因素下,共开发了 16 个主题。主要主题包括初级保健提供者培训的必要性、明确界定每个医疗保健提供者的角色、为全科医生提供诊断和治疗总结、以及后续护理的协议或指南、确保提供者之间快速准确的沟通、利用电子病历和生存护理计划作为沟通工具、以及制定一致的政策以减少服务碎片化。

结论

基于综述结果提出了实践和政策建议,这可能有助于共同癌症护理的更广泛实施。

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to shared primary and specialist cancer care: a systematic review.促进和阻碍初级保健与专科癌症护理共享的因素:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jan;29(1):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05624-5. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
2
The Role of Primary Care Physicians in Childhood Cancer Survivorship Care: Multiperspective Interviews.初级保健医生在儿童癌症生存者护理中的作用:多视角访谈。
Oncologist. 2019 May;24(5):710-719. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0103. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence.癌症幸存者与医疗服务提供者的幸存者护理计划偏好:证据的系统评价与质量评估
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Feb;10(1):71-86. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0452-0. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Primary care provider-led cancer survivorship care in the first 5 years following initial cancer treatment: a scoping review of the barriers and solutions to implementation.初级保健提供者主导的癌症生存护理在初始癌症治疗后的头 5 年内:实施障碍和解决方案的范围综述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Apr;18(2):352-365. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01268-y. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
8
Sharing Cancer Survivorship Care between Oncology and Primary Care Providers: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Professionals' Experiences.肿瘤学与初级保健提供者之间的癌症幸存者护理共享:一项关于医疗保健专业人员经历的定性研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 16;9(9):2991. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092991.
9
Effectiveness and implementation of models of cancer survivorship care: an overview of systematic reviews.癌症康复护理模式的有效性和实施情况:系统评价概述。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Feb;17(1):197-221. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01128-1. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
10
Patient-Reported Barriers and Facilitators to Seeking and Accessing Support in Gynecologic and Breast Cancer Survivors With Sexual Problems: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies.妇科和乳腺癌幸存者中存在性问题时寻求和获得支持的障碍和促进因素:定性和定量研究的系统评价。
J Sex Med. 2020 Jul;17(7):1326-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting Alma Ata: A Blueprint for Cancer Care.重温阿拉木图宣言:癌症护理蓝图
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251363701. doi: 10.1177/10732748251363701. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
The cardio-oncology multidisciplinary team: beyond the basics.心脏肿瘤多学科团队:超越基础
Cardiooncology. 2025 Jul 26;11(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40959-025-00369-8.
3
Oncologist and General Practitioner Perspectives of Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.肿瘤学家和全科医生对结直肠癌幸存者共享护理的看法:一项定性研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies.癌症诊断后的工作回归:综述评论的元分析和近期定性研究的元综合。
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Apr;14(2):114-134. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
2
Clinical Oncology Society of Australia position statement on cancer survivorship care.澳大利亚临床肿瘤学会癌症生存护理立场声明。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2019 Dec;48(12):833-836. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-07-19-4999.
3
Identifying the most prevalent unmet needs of cancer survivors in Australia: A systematic review.
Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70223. doi: 10.1002/pon.70223.
4
Mixed-methods organizational evaluation of a physical activity programme for cancer survivors in primary care.对基层医疗中针对癌症幸存者的体育活动项目进行的混合方法组织评估。
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf029.
5
Implementation and effectiveness of a nurse-enabled, shared-care follow-up model for early breast cancer survivors (The IBIS-Survivorship Study): protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.一项针对早期乳腺癌幸存者的由护士主导的共享护理随访模式的实施与效果(IBIS 生存研究):一项阶梯式楔形整群随机试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):e103341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103341.
6
Mapping barriers, enablers and implementation determinants to shared models of care for physical health and sexual wellbeing among young people with mental health difficulties using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: A scoping review protocol.使用实施研究综合框架,将障碍、促进因素和实施决定因素映射到心理健康有问题的年轻人的身体健康和性健康共享照护模式:一项范围综述方案
HRB Open Res. 2025 May 12;8:28. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14032.2. eCollection 2025.
7
Patient outcomes from a physical activity programme for cancer survivors in general practice: an intervention implementation study.一项关于癌症幸存者体力活动计划在全科医疗中的患者结局:一项干预实施研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 May 2;75(754):e366-e374. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0558. Print 2025 May.
8
Implementing a nurse-enabled, integrated, shared-care model involving specialists and general practitioners in early breast cancer post-treatment follow-up (EMINENT): a single-centre, open-label, phase 2, parallel-group, pilot, randomised, controlled trial.实施一种由护士主导、整合了专科医生和全科医生的共享照护模式用于早期乳腺癌治疗后随访(EMINENT):一项单中心、开放标签、2期、平行组、试点、随机对照试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Feb 5;81:103090. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103090. eCollection 2025 Mar.
9
Cancer Survivorship and the Significance of an Integrated Diachronic Life Course Perspective.癌症幸存者与综合历时性生命历程视角的意义
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Feb;47(2):e70012. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70012.
10
Factors affecting cancer care delivery in primary care: a qualitative study.影响基层医疗中癌症护理提供的因素:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2025 Jan 17;42(1). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmae077.
确定澳大利亚癌症幸存者最普遍的未满足需求:一项系统综述。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct;15(5):e68-e78. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13176. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
4
Building Personalized Cancer Follow-up Care Pathways in the United States: Lessons Learned From Implementation in England, Northern Ireland, and Australia.在美国构建个性化癌症随访护理路径:从英格兰、北爱尔兰和澳大利亚的实施经验中汲取的教训
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:625-639. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_238267. Epub 2019 May 17.
5
Developing a Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework: Implications for Clinical Care, Research, and Policy.制定癌症生存者照护质量框架:对临床照护、研究和政策的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Nov 1;111(11):1120-1130. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz089.
6
Implementing personalized pathways for cancer follow-up care in the United States: Proceedings from an American Cancer Society-American Society of Clinical Oncology summit.美国实施癌症随访护理的个性化路径:美国癌症协会-美国临床肿瘤学会峰会会议记录。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 May;69(3):234-247. doi: 10.3322/caac.21558. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
7
The Effectiveness of Shared Care in Cancer Survivors-A Systematic Review.共享照护对癌症幸存者的有效性——一项系统评价
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Oct 12;18(4):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3954.
8
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Perceptions of shared care among survivors of colorectal cancer from non-English-speaking and English-speaking backgrounds: a qualitative study.非英语背景和英语背景的结直肠癌幸存者对共享护理的认知:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 30;19(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0822-6.
10
SCORE: Shared care of Colorectal cancer survivors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.SCORE:结直肠癌幸存者的共享护理:一项随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 30;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2245-4.