Department of General and Upper GI Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8451-8457. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09103-2. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
An emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy (EMLC) is commonly performed for all biliary pathology, yet EMLC can be challenging due to acute inflammation. Understanding the risks of EMLC is necessary before patients can make an informed decision regarding operative management. The aim of the present study was to compare rates of operative and post-operative outcomes between EMLC and elective LC (ELLC) using a large contemporary cohort, to inform the consent process and influence surgical decision making.
All patients who underwent EMLC and ELLC in one UK health board between January 2015 and December 2019 were considered for inclusion. Data were collected retrospectively from multiple regional databases using a deterministic records-linkage methodology. Patients were followed up for 100 days post-operatively for adverse outcomes and outcomes were compared between groups using both univariate and multivariate analysis adjusting for pre-operative factors.
A total of 2768 LCs were performed [age (range), 52(13-92); M:F, 1:2.7]. In both the univariate and multivariate analysis, EMLC was positively associated with subtotal cholecystectomy (RR 2.0; p < 0.001), post-operative complication (RR 2.8; p < 0.001), post-operative imaging (RR 2.0; p < 0.001), post-operative intervention (RR 2.3; p < 0.001), prolonged post-operative hospitalisation (RR 3.8; p < 0.001) and readmission (RR 2.2; p < 0.001). EMLC had higher rates of post-operative mortality in univariate analysis (RR 10.8; p = 0.01).
EMLC is positively associated with adverse outcomes versus ELLC. Of course this study does not focus on a specific biliary pathology; nevertheless, it illustrates the additional risk associated with EMLC. This should be clearly outlined during the consent process but should be balanced with the risk of further biliary attacks. Further studies are required to identify particular patient groups who benefit from elective surgery.
对于所有胆道病变,通常都进行紧急腹腔镜胆囊切除术(EMLC),但由于急性炎症,EMLC 可能具有挑战性。在患者就手术管理做出明智决策之前,了解 EMLC 的风险是必要的。本研究的目的是使用大型当代队列比较 EMLC 和择期 LC(ELLC)之间的手术和术后结果的发生率,为知情同意过程提供信息并影响手术决策。
考虑纳入 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在一个英国卫生委员会接受 EMLC 和 ELLC 的所有患者。使用确定性记录链接方法从多个区域数据库中回顾性收集数据。对患者进行 100 天的术后不良结局随访,并使用单变量和多变量分析比较组间结果,同时调整术前因素。
共进行了 2768 例 LC [年龄(范围),52(13-92);M:F,1:2.7]。在单变量和多变量分析中,EMLC 与次全胆囊切除术(RR 2.0;p<0.001)、术后并发症(RR 2.8;p<0.001)、术后影像学检查(RR 2.0;p<0.001)、术后干预(RR 2.3;p<0.001)、术后住院时间延长(RR 3.8;p<0.001)和再入院(RR 2.2;p<0.001)呈正相关。在单变量分析中,EMLC 的术后死亡率更高(RR 10.8;p=0.01)。
EMLC 与 ELLC 相比,与不良结局呈正相关。当然,本研究并未专门针对特定的胆道病变;然而,它说明了与 EMLC 相关的额外风险。这应该在知情同意过程中明确说明,但应与进一步胆道发作的风险相平衡。需要进一步的研究来确定从择期手术中受益的特定患者群体。