Lee Eunjung, Greenblatt Andrea, Hu Ran, Johnstone Marjorie, Kourgiantakis Toula
Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work.
School of Social Work.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2022;92(3):310-321. doi: 10.1037/ort0000610. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
Psychotherapy research has shown evidence of positive impacts of broaching cultural differences on the therapy process and outcomes. This increasing body of research also highlights a need to clarify clinical skills of broaching and subsequent bridging to guide therapists in cross-cultural psychotherapy. In articulating microskills to promote broaching and bridging, we critically reflect on cautions against slipping into a technocratic approach that is a mechanical prescriptive skill-based guideline. Using critical theory on epistemic injustice, we examine how to integrate cultural aspects into therapy conversations that are aligned with epistemic and social justice. Drawing from sociolinguistic and critical scholars on language and power, we interrogate epistemic domains of knowledge and power during broaching and bridging in everyday clinical talks. We focus on theorizing and illustrating "how-to-do" broaching and bridging to guide therapists in everyday cross-cultural encounters with selected microskills such as a therapist's self-disclosure, cultural immediacy, and reflective listening. Using case illustrations with detailed transcripts for each skill, we interrogate how a client's epistemic status can be managed in the moment-to-moment conversation between a client and therapist in the continuum from dismissing to deepening the client's experience. A series of detailed case illustrations are intended to guide therapists' self-reflection and/or train therapists toward meaningful cross-cultural work. Lastly, we discuss the implications of broaching and bridging while situating this work as promoting epistemic justice in cross-cultural therapy encounters. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
心理治疗研究表明,探讨文化差异对治疗过程和结果有积极影响。越来越多的这类研究还凸显出有必要阐明探讨文化差异及后续衔接的临床技巧,以指导治疗师进行跨文化心理治疗。在阐述促进探讨和衔接的微观技巧时,我们审慎反思了避免陷入技术官僚主义方法的警示,这种方法是一种基于机械规定性技巧的指导方针。运用关于认知不公正的批判理论,我们研究如何将文化因素融入与认知和社会公正相一致的治疗对话中。借鉴社会语言学和批判学者关于语言与权力的观点,我们审视日常临床谈话中探讨和衔接过程中的知识和权力的认知领域。我们专注于对“如何进行”探讨和衔接进行理论化并加以说明,以指导治疗师在日常跨文化交流中运用诸如治疗师自我表露、文化即时性和反思性倾听等选定的微观技巧。通过为每种技巧提供带有详细文字记录的案例说明,我们审视在从忽视到深化来访者体验的连续过程中,如何在来访者与治疗师的即时对话中管理来访者的认知状态。一系列详细的案例说明旨在指导治疗师进行自我反思和/或培训治疗师开展有意义的跨文化工作。最后,我们讨论探讨和衔接的意义,并将这项工作定位为在跨文化治疗交流中促进认知公正。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2022 美国心理学会,保留所有权利)