• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尖峰时间依赖性可塑性奖励同步性而非因果关系。

Spike-timing-dependent plasticity rewards synchrony rather than causality.

作者信息

Anisimova Margarita, van Bommel Bas, Wang Rui, Mikhaylova Marina, Wiegert Jörn Simon, Oertner Thomas G, Gee Christine E

机构信息

Center for Molecular Neurobiology Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Falkenried 94, D-20251 Hamburg, Germany.

Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, Feie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2022 Dec 15;33(1):23-34. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac050.

DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhac050
PMID:35203089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9758582/
Abstract

Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is a candidate mechanism for information storage in the brain, but the whole-cell recordings required for the experimental induction of STDP are typically limited to 1 h. This mismatch of time scales is a long-standing weakness in synaptic theories of memory. Here we use spectrally separated optogenetic stimulation to fire precisely timed action potentials (spikes) in CA3 and CA1 pyramidal cells. Twenty minutes after optogenetic induction of STDP (oSTDP), we observed timing-dependent depression (tLTD) and timing-dependent potentiation (tLTP), depending on the sequence of spiking. As oSTDP does not require electrodes, we could also assess the strength of these paired connections three days later. At this late time point, late tLTP was observed for both causal (CA3 before CA1) and anticausal (CA1 before CA3) timing, but not for asynchronous activity patterns (Δt = 50 ms). Blocking activity after induction of oSTDP prevented stable potentiation. Our results confirm that neurons wire together if they fire together, but suggest that synaptic depression after anticausal activation (tLTD) is a transient phenomenon.

摘要

尖峰时间依赖性可塑性(STDP)是大脑中信息存储的一种潜在机制,但实验诱导STDP所需的全细胞记录通常限于1小时。这种时间尺度的不匹配是记忆突触理论中长期存在的一个弱点。在这里,我们使用光谱分离的光遗传学刺激在CA3和CA1锥体细胞中精确激发定时动作电位(尖峰)。在光遗传学诱导STDP(oSTDP)20分钟后,我们观察到了时间依赖性抑制(tLTD)和时间依赖性增强(tLTP),这取决于尖峰的顺序。由于oSTDP不需要电极,我们还可以在三天后评估这些配对连接的强度。在这个较晚的时间点,对于因果性(CA3在CA1之前)和反因果性(CA1在CA3之前)的时间顺序都观察到了晚期tLTP,但对于异步活动模式(Δt = 50毫秒)则没有。在诱导oSTDP后阻断活动会阻止稳定的增强。我们的结果证实,如果神经元同时放电,它们会连接在一起,但表明反因果激活后的突触抑制(tLTD)是一种短暂现象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/cf7ce4976dc7/bhac050f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/e8512dfaef78/bhac050f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/48c739fc46fe/bhac050f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/ac2a002538cd/bhac050f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/0873a6b97e99/bhac050f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/cf7ce4976dc7/bhac050f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/e8512dfaef78/bhac050f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/48c739fc46fe/bhac050f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/ac2a002538cd/bhac050f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/0873a6b97e99/bhac050f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c06/9758582/cf7ce4976dc7/bhac050f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Spike-timing-dependent plasticity rewards synchrony rather than causality.尖峰时间依赖性可塑性奖励同步性而非因果关系。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Dec 15;33(1):23-34. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac050.
2
Long-term population spike-timing-dependent plasticity promotes synaptic tagging but not cross-tagging in rat hippocampal area CA1.长期的群体尖峰时间依赖性可塑性促进了突触标记,但不促进大鼠海马 CA1 区的交叉标记。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5737-5746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817643116. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
3
Endocannabinoids mediate bidirectional striatal spike-timing-dependent plasticity.内源性大麻素介导双向纹状体峰电位时间依赖性可塑性。
J Physiol. 2015 Jul 1;593(13):2833-49. doi: 10.1113/JP270324. Epub 2015 May 13.
4
Asymmetric spike-timing dependent plasticity of striatal nitric oxide-synthase interneurons.纹状体一氧化氮合酶中间神经元的不对称峰时依赖性可塑性
Neuroscience. 2009 Jun 2;160(4):744-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.015. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
5
Presynaptic Spike Timing-Dependent Long-Term Depression in the Mouse Hippocampus.小鼠海马体中突触前尖峰时间依赖性长时程抑制
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Aug;26(8):3637-3654. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw172. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
6
Spike-timing-dependent BDNF secretion and synaptic plasticity.时相关的脑源性神经营养因子分泌与突触可塑性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 2;369(1633):20130132. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0132. Print 2014 Jan 5.
7
Hebbian and non-Hebbian timing-dependent plasticity in the hippocampal CA3 region.海马 CA3 区的海伯氏和非海伯氏时变可塑性。
Hippocampus. 2020 Dec;30(12):1241-1256. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23252. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
8
Dopamine D1 and D5 receptors modulate spike timing-dependent plasticity at medial perforant path to dentate granule cell synapses.多巴胺D1和D5受体调节内侧穿通通路至齿状颗粒细胞突触处的峰电位时间依赖性可塑性。
J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 26;34(48):15888-97. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2400-14.2014.
9
Modulation of synaptic plasticity by the coactivation of spatially distinct synaptic inputs in rat hippocampal CA1 apical dendrites.大鼠海马 CA1 树突锥体上支不同空间部位突触输入的共激活对突触可塑性的调制。
Brain Res. 2013 Aug 14;1526:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.05.023. Epub 2013 May 24.
10
Hebbian Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity at the Cerebellar Input Stage.小脑输入阶段的赫布型峰电位时间依赖性可塑性。
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 15;37(11):2809-2823. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2079-16.2016. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Cryo-EM structure of a blue-shifted channelrhodopsin from Klebsormidium nitens.来自莱茵衣藻的蓝移通道视紫红质的冷冻电镜结构。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jun 18;16(1):5297. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59299-9.
2
Opportunities and Challenges of Brain-on-a-Chip Interfaces.脑机接口的机遇与挑战
Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2025 Jun 17;6:0287. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0287. eCollection 2025.
3
A unified framework to model synaptic dynamics during the sleep-wake cycle.一个用于模拟睡眠-觉醒周期中突触动力学的统一框架。

本文引用的文献

1
Freeze-frame imaging of synaptic activity using SynTagMA.使用 SynTagMA 进行突触活动的定格成像。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 18;11(1):2464. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16315-4.
2
Indirect and direct training of spiking neural networks for end-to-end control of a lane-keeping vehicle.用于车道保持车辆端到端控制的尖峰神经网络的间接和直接训练。
Neural Netw. 2020 Jan;121:21-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Neuromodulation of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity: Past, Present, and Future.《基于尖峰时间依赖可塑性的神经调节:过去、现在和未来》
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jun 12;23(6):e3003198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003198. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Ex vivo cortical circuits learn to predict and spontaneously replay temporal patterns.体外皮质回路学会预测并自发重放时间模式。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 4;16(1):3179. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58013-z.
5
Interfacing with the Brain: How Nanotechnology Can Contribute.与大脑交互:纳米技术如何发挥作用。
ACS Nano. 2025 Mar 25;19(11):10630-10717. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c10525. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
6
Evolving alterations of structural organization and functional connectivity in feedforward neural networks after induced P301L tau mutation.诱导性P301L tau突变后前馈神经网络中结构组织和功能连接性的不断变化。
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Dec;60(12):7228-7248. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16625. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
7
Large-scale interactions in predictive processing: oscillatory versus transient dynamics.预测性处理中的大规模相互作用:振荡动力学与瞬态动力学
Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 Feb;29(2):133-148. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.013. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
8
Optogenetics and Targeted Gene Therapy for Retinal Diseases: Unravelling the Fundamentals, Applications, and Future Perspectives.视网膜疾病的光遗传学与靶向基因治疗:解读基本原理、应用及未来展望
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 19;13(14):4224. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144224.
9
Practical considerations in an era of multicolor optogenetics.多色光遗传学时代的实际考量
Front Cell Neurosci. 2023 May 24;17:1160245. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1160245. eCollection 2023.
10
Predictive coding of natural images by V1 firing rates and rhythmic synchronization.V1 放电率和节律同步对自然图像的预测编码。
Neuron. 2022 Apr 6;110(7):1240-1257.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
Neuron. 2019 Aug 21;103(4):563-581. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.041.
4
Long-term population spike-timing-dependent plasticity promotes synaptic tagging but not cross-tagging in rat hippocampal area CA1.长期的群体尖峰时间依赖性可塑性促进了突触标记,但不促进大鼠海马 CA1 区的交叉标记。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5737-5746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817643116. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
5
c-Fos and neuronal plasticity: the aftermath of Kaczmarek's theory.c-Fos与神经元可塑性:卡兹马雷克理论的后续影响
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2018;78(4):287-296.
6
Plasticity of intrinsic neuronal excitability.内在神经元兴奋性的可塑性。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 Feb;54:73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
7
Modulation of Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity: Towards the Inclusion of a Third Factor in Computational Models.尖峰时间依赖性可塑性的调制:迈向在计算模型中纳入第三个因素
Front Comput Neurosci. 2018 Jul 3;12:49. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2018.00049. eCollection 2018.
8
STDP-based spiking deep convolutional neural networks for object recognition.基于 STDP 的尖峰深度卷积神经网络的目标识别。
Neural Netw. 2018 Mar;99:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
9
Behavioral time scale synaptic plasticity underlies CA1 place fields.行为时间尺度的突触可塑性是CA1位置场的基础。
Science. 2017 Sep 8;357(6355):1033-1036. doi: 10.1126/science.aan3846.
10
Single-Cell Electroporation of Neurons.神经元的单细胞电穿孔
Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2017 Feb 1;2017(2):2017/2/pdb.prot094904. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot094904.