Karaboué Abdoulaye, Collon Thierry, Pavese Ida, Bodiguel Viviane, Cucherousset Joel, Zakine Elda, Innominato Pasquale F, Bouchahda Mohamed, Adam René, Lévi Francis
Medical Oncology Unit, GHT Paris Grand Nord-Est, Le Raincy-Montfermeil, 93770 Montfermeil, France.
UPR "Chronotherapy, Cancer and Transplantation", Medical School, Paris-Saclay University, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 11;14(4):896. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040896.
Prior experimental and human studies have demonstrated the circadian organization of immune cells' proliferation, trafficking, and antigen recognition and destruction. Nivolumab targets T(CD8) cells, the functions, and trafficking of which are regulated by circadian clocks, hence suggesting possible daily changes in nivolumab's efficacy. Worse progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were reported for malignant melanoma patients receiving more than 20% of their immune checkpoint inhibitor infusions after 16:30 as compared to earlier in the day.
Consecutive metastatic non-small-cell cancer (NSCLC) patients received nivolumab (240 mg iv q 2 weeks) at a daily time that was 'randomly' allocated for each course on a logistical basis by the day-hospital coordinators. The median time of all nivolumab administrations was computed for each patient. The study population was split into two timing groups based upon the median value of the median treatment times of all patients. CTCAE-toxicity rates, iRECIST-tumor responses, PFS and OS were computed according to nivolumab timing. PFS and OS curves were compared and hazard ratios (HR) were computed for all major categories of characteristics. Multivariable and sensitivity analyses were also performed.
The study accrued 95 stage-IV NSCLC patients (PS 0-1, 96%), aged 41-83 years. The majority of nivolumab administrations occurred between 9:27 and 12:54 for 48 patients ('morning' group) and between 12:55 and 17:14 for the other 47 ('afternoon' group). Median PFS (95% CL) was 11.3 months (5.5-17.1) for the 'morning' group and 3.1 months (1.5-4.6) for the 'afternoon' one ( < 0.001). Median OS was 34.2 months (15.1-53.3) and 9.6 months (4.9-14.4) for the 'morning' group and the 'afternoon' one, respectively ( < 0.001). Multivariable analyses identified 'morning' timing as a significant predictor of longer PFS and OS, with respective HR values of 0.26 (0.11-0.58) and 0.17 (0.08-0.37). The timing effect was consistent across all patient subgroups tested.
Nivolumab was nearly four times as effective following 'morning' as compared to 'afternoon' dosing in this cohort of NSCLC patients. Prospective timing-studies are needed to minimize the risk of resistance and to maximize the benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors.
先前的实验和人体研究已证明免疫细胞的增殖、运输以及抗原识别和破坏存在昼夜节律性。纳武单抗靶向T(CD8)细胞,其功能和运输受生物钟调节,因此提示纳武单抗的疗效可能存在每日变化。据报道,与在当天较早时间接受免疫检查点抑制剂输注相比,恶性黑色素瘤患者在16:30之后接受超过20%的免疫检查点抑制剂输注时,无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)更差。
连续性转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受纳武单抗(240mg静脉注射,每2周一次),日间医院协调员根据后勤情况为每个疗程“随机”分配每日给药时间。计算每位患者所有纳武单抗给药的中位时间。根据所有患者中位治疗时间的中位值,将研究人群分为两个给药时间组。根据纳武单抗给药时间计算CTCAE毒性率、iRECIST肿瘤反应、PFS和OS。比较PFS和OS曲线,并计算所有主要特征类别的风险比(HR)。还进行了多变量分析和敏感性分析。
该研究纳入了95例IV期NSCLC患者(PS 0 - 1,96%),年龄41 - 83岁。48例患者(“上午”组)的纳武单抗给药大多发生在9:27至12:54之间,另外47例患者(“下午”组)的给药时间在12:55至17:14之间。“上午”组的中位PFS(95%置信区间)为11.3个月(5.5 - 17.1),“下午”组为3.1个月(1.5 - 4.6)(<0.001)。“上午”组和“下午”组的中位OS分别为34.2个月(15.1 - 53.3)和9.6个月(4.9 - 14.4)(<0.001)。多变量分析确定“上午”给药时间是PFS和OS更长的显著预测因素,相应的HR值分别为0.26(0.11 - 0.58)和0.17(0.08 - 0.37)。在所有测试的患者亚组中,给药时间的影响是一致的。
在该NSCLC患者队列中,纳武单抗“上午”给药的疗效几乎是“下午”给药的四倍。需要进行前瞻性给药时间研究,以尽量降低耐药风险,并使免疫检查点抑制剂的获益最大化。