• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态创新和经济创新水平作为欧盟国家类型学的基础。

Eco-Innovation and Innovation Level of the Economy as a Basis for the Typology of the EU Countries.

机构信息

Department of Regional Economy, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Nowowiejska 3, 58-500 Jelenia Góra, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;19(4):2005. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042005.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19042005
PMID:35206192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8872443/
Abstract

The study addresses the issue of eco-innovation and innovation in the European Union countries, which is important from the perspective of the sustainable development paradigm. Innovation constitutes a significant factor related to socio-economic development, and it is crucial in constructing the competitive advantage of enterprises, regions, and countries. Nowadays, an increasing importance is attached to eco-innovations, which takes into account the ecological perspective ensuring the reduction of environmental burdens. The purpose of the conducted research was to assess the diversity among the European Union countries regarding the situation related to eco-innovation and innovation, which is focused on the typology of the EU Member States taking a holistic approach to innovation, i.e., considering not only economic but also environmental and social performance. The methods of multivariate statistical analysis, with a particular emphasis on classification methods, were used in the research. A holistic overview of innovation results from the combination of findings based on the research was carried out within the framework of the Eco-Innovation Observatory and the European Innovation Scoreboard. The study covered 28 European Union countries in the period 2013-2019. As a result of the conducted analyses, four classes of the EU Member States were identified (Leaders of Eco-Innovation and Innovation, Moderate Eco-Innovators and Catching-Up Leaders of Innovation, Poor Innovators, The Poorest Eco-Innovators and Innovators).

摘要

本研究探讨了欧洲联盟国家的生态创新和创新问题,从可持续发展范式的角度来看,这是很重要的。创新是与社会经济发展相关的重要因素,对于构建企业、地区和国家的竞争优势至关重要。如今,生态创新越来越受到重视,它考虑到了生态视角,确保了环境负担的减轻。进行这项研究的目的是评估欧盟国家在生态创新和创新方面的多样性,该研究侧重于欧盟成员国的类型学,采用整体方法进行创新,即不仅考虑经济绩效,还考虑环境和社会绩效。在研究中使用了多元统计分析方法,特别是分类方法。在生态创新观测站和欧洲创新记分牌的框架内,通过结合研究结果进行综合创新概述。本研究涵盖了 2013 年至 2019 年期间的 28 个欧盟国家。通过进行分析,确定了欧盟成员国的四个类别(生态创新和创新的领导者、适度的生态创新者和创新的追赶领导者、创新较差者、生态创新和创新最差者)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/8872443/3ae51e1113f6/ijerph-19-02005-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/8872443/38bedb138bca/ijerph-19-02005-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/8872443/0cc4690c6a99/ijerph-19-02005-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/8872443/c59545083530/ijerph-19-02005-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/8872443/3ae51e1113f6/ijerph-19-02005-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/8872443/38bedb138bca/ijerph-19-02005-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/8872443/0cc4690c6a99/ijerph-19-02005-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/8872443/c59545083530/ijerph-19-02005-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c65c/8872443/3ae51e1113f6/ijerph-19-02005-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Eco-Innovation and Innovation Level of the Economy as a Basis for the Typology of the EU Countries.生态创新和经济创新水平作为欧盟国家类型学的基础。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;19(4):2005. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042005.
2
Regional convergence analysis of sustainable innovation efficiency in European Union countries.欧盟国家可持续创新效率的区域收敛分析。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt B):116636. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116636. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
3
Modeling circular economy innovation and performance indicators in European Union countries.欧盟国家的循环经济创新和绩效指标建模。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(34):81573-81584. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26431-5. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
4
Assessing the level of digitalization and robotization in the enterprises of the European Union Member States.评估欧盟成员国企业的数字化和机器人化水平。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254993. eCollection 2021.
5
Measurement of Progress in the Environmental Area: Poland against the Countries of the European Union.环境领域进展的衡量:波兰与欧盟国家的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):563. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010563.
6
Financial development, resource richness, eco-innovation, and sustainable development: Does geopolitical risk matter?金融发展、资源丰富度、生态创新与可持续发展:地缘政治风险有影响吗?
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119824. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119824. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
7
Analyzing economic growth, eco-innovation, and ecological quality nexus in E-7 countries: accounting for non-linear impacts of urbanization by using a new measure of ecological quality.分析 E-7 国家的经济增长、生态创新和生态质量关系:通过使用新的生态质量衡量标准来考虑城市化的非线性影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(41):94242-94254. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29017-3. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
8
Analysis of the efficiency and structure of energy consumption in the industrial sector in the European Union countries between 1995 and 2019.分析 1995 年至 2019 年间欧盟国家工业部门能源消耗的效率和结构。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 20;808:152052. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152052. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
9
Comparative development of knowledge-based bioeconomy in the European Union and Turkey.欧盟与土耳其基于知识的生物经济的比较发展
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014 Sep;34(3):269-80. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2013.792771. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
10
Spatio-temporal investigation of economic growth and environmental quality nexus in EU countries: New guidelines regarding green goods and eco-tax.欧盟国家经济增长与环境质量关系的时空研究:关于绿色商品和生态税的新准则。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jul;31(33):45564-45587. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34107-x. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Is air pollution detrimental to regional innovation? An empirical heterogeneity test based on Chinese cities.空气污染是否对区域创新有害?基于中国城市的实证异质性检验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;10:981306. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.981306. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Eco Trends, Counseling and Applied Ecology in Community Using .社区中使用生态趋势、咨询和应用生态学。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 18;18(12):6572. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126572.
2
Multidimensional Assessment of Eco-Innovation Implementation: Evidence from Spanish Agri-Food Sector.多维视角下的生态创新实施评估:来自西班牙农业食品部门的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 23;17(4):1432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041432.
3
How Do Anticipated and Self Regulations and Information Sourcing Openness Drive Firms to Implement Eco-Innovation? Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Firms.
预期自我调节和信息来源开放性如何推动企业实施生态创新?来自韩国制造企业的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 26;16(15):2678. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152678.
4
The place of eco-innovation in the current sustainability debate.生态创新在当前可持续性辩论中的地位。
Waste Manag. 2019 Apr 1;88:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.026. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
5
Hierarchical clustering schemes.层次聚类方案。
Psychometrika. 1967 Sep;32(3):241-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02289588.