Suppr超能文献

尼泊尔初级保健提供者对药物与心理干预治疗的偏好:一项试点性整群随机对照试验的混合方法分析。

Treatment Preferences for Pharmacological versus Psychological Interventions among Primary Care Providers in Nepal: Mixed Methods Analysis of a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;19(4):2149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042149.

Abstract

There is increasing evidence supporting the effectiveness of psychological interventions in low- and middle-income countries. However, primary care providers (PCPs) may prefer treating patients with medication. A secondary exploratory analysis of a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate psychological vs. pharmacological treatment preferences among PCPs. Thirty-four health facilities, including 205 PCPs, participated in the study, with PCPs in 17 facilities assigned to a standard version of the mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) training delivered by mental health specialists. PCPs in the other 17 facilities received mhGAP instruction delivered by specialists and people with lived experience of mental illness (PWLE), using a training strategy entitled Reducing Stigma among HealthcAre ProvidErs (RESHAPE). Pre- and post- intervention attitudes were measured through quantitative and qualitative tools. Qualitative interviews with 49 participants revealed that PCPs in both arms endorsed counseling's benefits and collaboration within the health system to provide counseling. In the RESHAPE arm, PCPs were more likely to increase endorsement of statements such as "depression improves without medication" ( = 9.83, < 0.001), "not all people with depression must be treated with antidepressants" ( = 17.62, < 0.001), and "providing counseling to people who have alcohol abuse problems is effective" ( = 26.20, < 0.001). These mixed-method secondary findings from a pilot trial suggest that in-person participation of PWLE in training PCPs may not only reduce stigma but also increase PCPs' support of psychological interventions. This requires further investigation in a full-scale trial.

摘要

越来越多的证据支持心理干预在中低收入国家的有效性。然而,初级保健提供者(PCP)可能更愿意用药物治疗患者。对一项试点整群随机对照试验的二次探索性分析评估了 PCP 对心理与药物治疗的偏好。34 个卫生机构,包括 205 名 PCP 参与了研究,其中 17 个机构的 PCP 被分配到心理健康专家提供的标准版本的心理健康差距行动规划(mhGAP)培训,另外 17 个机构的 PCP 接受了心理健康专家和有精神疾病经历的人(PWLE)提供的 mhGAP 指导,使用了一种名为“减少卫生保健提供者的污名”(RESHAPE)的培训策略。通过定量和定性工具测量干预前后的态度。对 49 名参与者的定性访谈显示,接受两种培训的 PCP 都认可咨询的好处以及在卫生系统内合作提供咨询。在 RESHAPE 组中,PCP 更有可能增加对以下陈述的认可,如“无需药物抑郁即可改善”( = 9.83,<0.001),“并非所有抑郁症患者都必须用抗抑郁药治疗”( = 17.62,<0.001),以及“向有酗酒问题的人提供咨询是有效的”( = 26.20,<0.001)。这些来自试点试验的混合方法二次发现表明,PWLE 亲自参与培训 PCP 不仅可以减少污名化,还可以增加 PCP 对心理干预的支持。这需要在全面试验中进一步调查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe61/8871897/40b85e2f54d3/ijerph-19-02149-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验