Burbank F H, Enzmann D R, Brody W R
Radiology. 1986 Jul;160(1):227-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.1.3520646.
Hybrid subtraction angiography can provide a higher percentage of two-view examinations of the carotid bifurcation. Unfortunately, hybrid images are lower in signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) than temporal subtraction angiographic images and are often described as "noisy." The present study was designed to determine if the lower S/N of hybrid subtraction angiography could be restricted to the contralateral carotid bifurcation by "splicing" a small hybrid region of interest into a larger temporal image. Twenty-two selected images were examined on four image quality scales by seven readers. Similarity of reader scoring was characterized by cluster analysis and was good. Ipsilateral carotid arteries were preferred as temporal images, and contralateral carotid arteries were preferred as hybrid images. The splice image was preferred over both. The splice image retained the superiority of temporal subtraction angiography in the region of the ipsilateral carotid artery and incorporated the superiority of hybrid subtraction angiography in the region of the contralateral carotid artery. The splice image incorporated the best features of both image modalities.
混合减影血管造影术能提供更高比例的颈动脉分叉部双视图检查。遗憾的是,混合图像的信噪比(S/N)低于时间减影血管造影图像,且常被描述为“有噪声”。本研究旨在确定通过将一个小的混合感兴趣区域“拼接”到一个更大的时间图像中,混合减影血管造影较低的信噪比是否可以局限于对侧颈动脉分叉部。由7名读者在四种图像质量尺度上检查了22张选定的图像。通过聚类分析表征读者评分的相似性,结果良好。同侧颈动脉作为时间图像更受青睐,对侧颈动脉作为混合图像更受青睐。拼接图像比两者都更受青睐。拼接图像在同侧颈动脉区域保留了时间减影血管造影的优势,并融合了混合减影血管造影在对侧颈动脉区域的优势。拼接图像融合了两种图像模式的最佳特征。