Institute of County Economic Development, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
School of Business, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4):2386. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042386.
The tightening of the financing environment and global climate change have become urgent problems for high-quality economic development all over the world. Facing these challenges, the Chinese government is committed to alleviating regional financing constraints and setting carbon-emission reduction targets. However, are these measures effective for high-quality urban development? This paper attempts to use unbalanced panel data from 290 cities on the Chinese mainland from 2004-2017 to provide an answer to the problem using a scatter plot and the mediator effect model. Results show that: (1) financing constraints limit the funds required for urban development, which is not conducive to high-quality urban development, but high-quality urban development has the characteristics of "path dependence"; (2) In the context of environmental regulation, financing constraints are mainly enacted through reducing carbon emissions, which is inconducive to high-quality urban development. Carbon emissions are the transmission mechanism whereby financing constraints affect high-quality urban development; (3) Cities with large financing constraints have insufficient capital investment for high-quality urban development, and the aggravation of financing constraints has an increasingly obvious inhibitory effect on high-quality urban development. Moreover, due to the effect of the global economic crisis in 2008, the negative effect of financing constraints on high-quality urban development had the characteristics of U-shaped fluctuation. Thus, this paper believes that the implementation of China's double carbon policy is at the expense of high-quality urban development, and there is a long way to go before high-quality urban development reaches later stages. Other countries should carefully weigh up the relationship between environmental pollution and economic development when facing financing constraints.
融资环境收紧和全球气候变化已成为世界各国高质量经济发展的紧迫问题。面对这些挑战,中国政府致力于缓解区域融资约束和设定碳减排目标。然而,这些措施是否对高质量城市发展有效?本文试图利用中国内地 2004-2017 年 290 个城市的非平衡面板数据,采用散点图和中介效应模型来回答这个问题。结果表明:(1)融资约束限制了城市发展所需的资金,不利于高质量城市发展,但高质量城市发展具有“路径依赖”的特点;(2)在环境规制背景下,融资约束主要通过减少碳排放来发挥作用,不利于高质量城市发展,碳排放是融资约束影响高质量城市发展的传导机制;(3)融资约束较大的城市,高质量城市发展的资金投入不足,融资约束的加剧对高质量城市发展的抑制作用日益明显。而且,由于 2008 年全球经济危机的影响,融资约束对高质量城市发展的负向影响呈现出 U 型波动的特征。因此,本文认为,中国双碳政策的实施是以牺牲高质量城市发展为代价的,高质量城市发展要达到后期阶段还有很长的路要走。其他国家在面对融资约束时,应仔细权衡环境污染与经济发展之间的关系。