• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗早期肺癌:单中心长期疼痛比较

Robotic and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Comparison of Long-Term Pain at a Single Centre.

作者信息

Testori Alberto, Giudici Veronica Maria, Voulaz Emanuele, Alloisio Marco, Bottoni Edoardo

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 19;11(4):1108. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041108.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11041108
PMID:35207381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8877832/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

Since the application of mini-invasive surgery to pulmonary lobectomy, various studies confirmed the feasibility and the safety of the technique, with equivalent oncological standards. However, there are no studies that compare long-term postoperative pain in minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

METHODS

Between 1 January 2019 and 28 February 2020, we analysed pain scores at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation, where 50 patients underwent a VATS lobectomy and 50 underwent a RATS lobectomy. Pain scores are obtained through a telephone questionnaire, according to a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).

RESULTS

The medias of the NRS scores, at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation were similar in both groups. Group I was composed of 50 patients who underwent a video-assisted lobectomy, while Group II was composed of 50 patients who underwent a robotic-assisted lobectomy. Two weeks after surgery Group I had a NRS value of 2.96 and in Group II it was 2.86; three months after in Group I the value was 2.16 and in Group II it was 2.06; six months after Group I 's value was 1.62 and Group II's was 1.56; one year after in Group I the value was 1.30 and in the Group II was 1.24. For each time interval, no statistically significant differences were found ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis, RATS and VATS did not have significant differences in post-operative and long-term pain.

摘要

背景

自从微创手术应用于肺叶切除术后,各种研究证实了该技术的可行性和安全性,且肿瘤学标准相当。然而,尚无研究比较微创胸外科手术后的长期疼痛情况。

方法

在2019年1月1日至2020年2月28日期间,我们分析了50例行电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术(VATS)和50例行机器人辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术(RATS)患者术后2周、3个月、6个月和1年的疼痛评分。疼痛评分通过电话问卷调查,依据数字评分量表(NRS)获得。

结果

两组患者术后2周、3个月、6个月和1年的NRS评分中位数相似。第一组由50例行电视辅助肺叶切除术的患者组成,第二组由50例行机器人辅助肺叶切除术的患者组成。术后2周,第一组NRS评分为2.96,第二组为2.86;术后3个月,第一组评分为2.16,第二组为2.06;术后6个月,第一组评分为1.62,第二组为1.56;术后1年,第一组评分为1.30,第二组为1.24。在每个时间间隔,均未发现统计学上的显著差异(>0.05)。

结论

在我们的分析中,RATS和VATS在术后及长期疼痛方面无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cd/8877832/7aa76c7e217a/jcm-11-01108-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cd/8877832/132a947777fb/jcm-11-01108-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cd/8877832/d99a09489cb8/jcm-11-01108-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cd/8877832/7aa76c7e217a/jcm-11-01108-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cd/8877832/132a947777fb/jcm-11-01108-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cd/8877832/d99a09489cb8/jcm-11-01108-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cd/8877832/7aa76c7e217a/jcm-11-01108-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Comparison of Long-Term Pain at a Single Centre.机器人辅助与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗早期肺癌:单中心长期疼痛比较
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 19;11(4):1108. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041108.
2
Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial.电视辅助胸腔镜手术与前外侧开胸术行肺叶切除术治疗早期肺癌的术后疼痛与生活质量比较:一项随机对照研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):836-844. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X. Epub 2016 May 6.
3
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Robotic Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer Versus Video-assisted Thoracoscopic and Open Thoracotomy Approach.机器人肺叶切除术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术和开胸手术治疗早期非小细胞肺癌的长期肿瘤学结果比较。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 May;21(3):214-224.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
4
A Comparison of the Differences in Postoperative Chronic Pain Between Video-Assisted and Robotic-Assisted Approaches in Thoracic Surgery.胸腔镜辅助与机器人辅助手术治疗胸外科术后慢性疼痛差异的比较
Cureus. 2022 Nov 20;14(11):e31688. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31688. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Postoperative pain after lobectomy: robot-assisted, video-assisted and open thoracic surgery.肺叶切除术后疼痛:机器人辅助、电视辅助和开胸手术。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):131-136. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00953-y. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
6
[Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy versus open lobectomy for mini pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer].[电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与开胸肺叶切除术治疗微小病理N2期非小细胞肺癌的对比研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Sep 1;49(9):820-4.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Compare with Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Lung Lobectomy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)与电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)用于非小细胞肺癌患者肺叶切除的疗效及安全性比较
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2019;22(3):169-178. doi: 10.2174/1386207322666190411113040.
8
Uniportal and three-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: analysis of the Italian video-assisted thoracic surgery group database.单孔与三孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术:意大利电视辅助胸腔镜手术组数据库分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Nov 1;29(5):714-721. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz153.
9
Post-thoracotomy pain and long-term survival associated with video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy methods for clinical T1N0 lung cancer: a patient-oriented, prospective cohort study.胸腔镜手术后疼痛与临床 T1N0 期肺癌行电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术患者的长期生存相关:一项以患者为中心的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;44(1):e71-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt107. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
10
Long-term Survival Based on the Surgical Approach to Lobectomy For Clinical Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Robotic, Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery, and Thoracotomy Lobectomy.基于临床I期非小细胞肺癌肺叶切除术手术方式的长期生存情况:机器人手术、电视辅助胸腔镜手术和开胸肺叶切除术的比较
Ann Surg. 2017 Feb;265(2):431-437. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001708.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty, Illness Perception and Lung Functional Exercise Adherence in Lung Cancer Patients After Thoracoscopic Surgery.胸腔镜手术后肺癌患者的衰弱、疾病认知与肺功能锻炼依从性
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Nov 2;17:2773-2787. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S435944. eCollection 2023.
2
Postoperative analgesia following robot-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal disease: retrospective comparative study of general anesthesia alone, combined with epidural analgesia, and with ultrasound-guided thoracic paraspinal block.机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔疾病后的术后镇痛:单纯全身麻醉、联合硬膜外镇痛及超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞的回顾性比较研究
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Mar 15;11(5):206. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4258. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study).早期肺癌患者机器人辅助与手动电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术围手术期结果:一项随机多中心研究(ROMAN研究)的结果
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 9;11:726408. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.726408. eCollection 2021.
2
Quality of Life, Postoperative Pain, and Lymph Node Dissection in a Robotic Approach Compared to VATS and OPEN for Early Stage Lung Cancer.与电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)和开放手术相比,机器人手术治疗早期肺癌的生活质量、术后疼痛及淋巴结清扫情况
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 14;10(8):1687. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081687.
3
Uniportal and three-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: analysis of the Italian video-assisted thoracic surgery group database.
单孔与三孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术:意大利电视辅助胸腔镜手术组数据库分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Nov 1;29(5):714-721. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz153.
4
Postoperative pain after lobectomy: robot-assisted, video-assisted and open thoracic surgery.肺叶切除术后疼痛:机器人辅助、电视辅助和开胸手术。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):131-136. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00953-y. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
5
Robotic surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and open surgery for early stage lung cancer: comparison of costs and outcomes at a single institute.早期肺癌的机器人手术、电视辅助胸腔镜手术和开放手术:单机构成本与结果比较
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Feb;10(2):790-798. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.123.
6
Transition from video-assisted thoracic surgery to robotic pulmonary surgery.从电视辅助胸腔手术到机器人肺手术的转变。
J Vis Surg. 2017 Apr 10;3:55. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.03.04. eCollection 2017.
7
Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.早期和局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC):ESMO诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv1-iv21. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx222.
8
Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非小细胞肺癌患者机器人辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术的可行性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 May 8;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1168-6.
9
Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state.使用视觉模拟评分法测量急性术后疼痛:最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):424-429. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew466.
10
Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial.电视辅助胸腔镜手术与前外侧开胸术行肺叶切除术治疗早期肺癌的术后疼痛与生活质量比较:一项随机对照研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):836-844. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X. Epub 2016 May 6.