Suppr超能文献

生物活性窝沟封闭剂与乳牙和恒牙粘结的微拉伸粘结强度

Microtensile Bond Strength of Bioactive Pit and Fissure Sealants Bonded to Primary and Permanent Teeth.

作者信息

AlQahtani Abdulelah, Al-Dlaigan Yousef, Almahdy Ahmed

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 12;15(4):1369. doi: 10.3390/ma15041369.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sealing occlusal pits and fissures is an effective preventive measure against dental caries. Pit and fissure sealants (PFS) should be strongly bonded to the teeth to prevent partial or complete loss of the sealant, which may limit its preventive effect.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bioactive resin-based sealants (Bio-RBS) and resin-based sealants (RBS), with and without the use of a bonding agent, to the enamel of primary and permanent teeth.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty caries-free primary molar specimens and 120 permanent molar specimens were divided to eight groups (30 specimens per group), both primary and permanent teeth were sealed with a Bio-RBS BioCoat (Premier, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA) or with a RBS Clinpro (3M ESPE, Saint Paul, MN, USA), with or without the use of a bonding agent (Prime & Bond NT; Dentsply, Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA). Half the specimens were aged with 5000 thermal cycles, and all specimens were tested for the μTBS and failure mode.

RESULTS

The mean μTBS of aged Bio-RBS was higher in permanent teeth than primary teeth, and the aging process reduced the μTBS of RBS more than that of Bio-RBS. Moreover, the addition of a bonding agent improved the μTBS of aged RBS in permanent teeth.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that Bio-RBS exhibit superior μTBS than RBS when applied to permanent teeth.

摘要

背景

封闭咬合面窝沟是预防龋齿的有效措施。窝沟封闭剂(PFS)应与牙齿牢固粘结,以防止封闭剂部分或完全脱落,这可能会限制其预防效果。

目的

本研究的目的是比较使用和不使用粘结剂时,生物活性树脂基封闭剂(Bio-RBS)和树脂基封闭剂(RBS)与乳牙和恒牙牙釉质的微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)。

方法

将120颗无龋乳牙磨牙标本和120颗恒牙磨牙标本分为八组(每组30个标本),乳牙和恒牙均用Bio-RBS BioCoat(美国宾夕法尼亚州普利茅斯会议市的Premier公司)或RBS Clinpro(美国明尼苏达州圣保罗市的3M ESPE公司)进行封闭,使用或不使用粘结剂(Prime & Bond NT;美国北卡罗来纳州夏洛特市的登士柏国际公司)。一半标本进行5000次热循环老化,所有标本均测试其μTBS和失效模式。

结果

恒牙中老化Bio-RBS的平均μTBS高于乳牙,老化过程对RBS的μTBS降低幅度大于Bio-RBS。此外,添加粘结剂可提高恒牙中老化RBS的μTBS。

结论

我们得出结论,当应用于恒牙时,Bio-RBS的μTBS优于RBS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a37a/8875102/8b580b70a675/materials-15-01369-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验