Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 24;12(2):e056623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056623.
Perturbation-based balance training (PBT) is reported to effectively reduce falls in older adults and may even be superior compared with various exercise programmes. Due to the nature of the intervention, requiring unpredictable balance perturbations, the question arises whether acceptability is an issue in PBT.
To evaluate the acceptability of PBT in older adults with a recent history of falls.
DESIGN, METHOD, PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: This is a qualitative study in which semistructured interviews were conducted in 16 older adults (14 women and 2 men, mean age 73.6±6.0 years) who completed a three-session PBT protocol as part of another study in a university medical centre in the Netherlands. Typical case and purposive sampling strategies were applied. Interviews were based on the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) alongside context-specific factors and analysed using a template analysis approach.
The results indicate that this PBT protocol is perceived as acceptable by older adults with a recent history of falls and highlight key areas for potential future modifications. Enjoyment of the novel training and technology, being able to feel safe during training, and perceived impact of increased self-efficacy and balance confidence were identified as facilitating factors. Potential issues included initial apprehension or anxiety during training and perceived impact being predominantly psychological instead of physical. Complementary to the TFA one additional theme emerged which described challenges regarding the training setting, such as preference for group training in some participants and travel to the training location.
The results suggest that PBT is perceived acceptable by older adults with a history of falls. Increasing the social aspect of training and sharing the experiences of peers may be considered to enhance acceptability to new participants who initially feel apprehensive or anxious about their ability to participate in future implementation of PBT.
The article is linked to a randomised clinical trial registered on https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7680, NL7680; Results.
基于扰动的平衡训练(PBT)被报道能有效地减少老年人跌倒,甚至可能优于各种运动方案。由于干预的性质,需要不可预测的平衡扰动,因此出现了一个问题,即在 PBT 中,可接受性是否是一个问题。
评估近期跌倒的老年人对 PBT 的可接受性。
设计、方法、参与者和设置:这是一项定性研究,其中对 16 名完成了三次 PBT 方案的老年人(14 名女性和 2 名男性,平均年龄 73.6±6.0 岁)进行了半结构化访谈,这些老年人是荷兰一所大学医学中心的另一项研究的一部分。应用了典型案例和目的性抽样策略。访谈基于可接受性的理论框架(TFA)以及特定于上下文的因素,并使用模板分析方法进行分析。
结果表明,该 PBT 方案被近期跌倒的老年人认为是可接受的,并强调了潜在的未来修改的关键领域。享受新颖的训练和技术、在训练中感到安全、以及感知到自我效能和平衡信心的提高的影响被认为是促进因素。潜在的问题包括在训练期间最初的担忧或焦虑,以及感知到的影响主要是心理上的而不是身体上的。除了 TFA 之外,还出现了一个额外的主题,描述了与训练环境有关的挑战,例如一些参与者更喜欢小组训练,以及到训练地点的旅行。
结果表明,有跌倒史的老年人认为 PBT 是可接受的。增加训练的社交方面,并分享同伴的经验,可能被认为是为那些最初对自己参与未来 PBT 实施的能力感到担忧或焦虑的新参与者增强可接受性的一种方式。
该文章链接到一个在 https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7680,NL7680 上注册的随机临床试验;结果。