Department of Biology, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411;
Division of Environmental Biology, National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 8;119(10). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117831119.
The history of the scientific enterprise demonstrates that it has supported gender, identity, and racial inequity. Further, its institutions have allowed discrimination, harassment, and personal harm of racialized persons and women. This has resulted in a suboptimal and demographically narrow research and innovation system, a concomitant limited lens on research agendas, and less effective knowledge translation between science and society. We argue that, to reverse this situation, the scientific community must reexamine its values and then collectively embark upon a moonshot-level new agenda for equity. This new agenda should be based upon the foundational value that scientific research and technological innovation should be prefaced upon progress toward a better world for all of society and that the process of how we conduct research is just as important as the results of research. Such an agenda will attract individuals who have been historically excluded from participation in science, but we will need to engage in substantial work to overcome the longstanding obstacles to their full participation. We highlight the need to implement this new agenda via a coordinated systems approach, recognizing the mutually reinforcing feedback dynamics among all science system components and aligning our equity efforts across them.
科学事业的历史表明,它助长了性别、身份和种族不平等。此外,其机构允许对少数族裔和女性进行歧视、骚扰和人身伤害。这导致了一个次优和人口结构狭窄的研究和创新系统,对研究议程的看法相应受到限制,以及科学与社会之间的知识转化效果较差。我们认为,为了扭转这种局面,科学界必须重新审视其价值观,然后集体制定一个具有登月计划水平的新的公平议程。这个新的议程应该基于这样一个基本价值观,即科学研究和技术创新应该以造福全社会的更好世界为前提,我们进行研究的过程与研究结果同样重要。这样的议程将吸引那些历史上被排除在科学参与之外的人,但我们需要做大量的工作来克服他们充分参与的长期障碍。我们强调需要通过协调的系统方法来实施这一新议程,认识到所有科学系统组成部分之间相互加强的反馈动态,并在这些组成部分之间协调我们的公平工作。