• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验熵驱动无聊决策任务中的选择行为。

Experienced entropy drives choice behavior in a boring decision-making task.

机构信息

Institute of Physiology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hanns-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 19, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Straße 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 24;12(1):3162. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06861-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-06861-w
PMID:35210465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8873446/
Abstract

Boredom has been defined as an aversive mental state that is induced by the disability to engage in satisfying activity, most often experienced in monotonous environments. However, current understanding of the situational factors inducing boredom and driving subsequent behavior remains incomplete. Here, we introduce a two-alternative forced-choice task coupled with sensory stimulation of different degrees of monotony. We find that human subjects develop a bias in decision-making, avoiding the more monotonous alternative that is correlated with self-reported state boredom. This finding was replicated in independent laboratory and online experiments and proved to be specific for the induction of boredom rather than curiosity. Furthermore, using theoretical modeling we show that the entropy in the sequence of individually experienced stimuli, a measure of information gain, serves as a major determinant to predict choice behavior in the task. With this, we underline the relevance of boredom for driving behavioral responses that ensure a lasting stream of information to the brain.

摘要

无聊被定义为一种厌恶的心理状态,是由无法参与到令人满意的活动引起的,这种状态通常发生在单调的环境中。然而,目前对于引起无聊和驱动后续行为的情境因素的理解并不完整。在这里,我们引入了一个双选择强制选择任务,同时对不同程度单调的感官刺激。我们发现,人类受试者在决策中形成了一种偏见,避免了更单调的选择,这与自我报告的状态无聊相关。这一发现得到了独立实验室和在线实验的重复验证,并且被证明是专门针对无聊感的诱导,而不是好奇心的诱导。此外,我们使用理论模型表明,个体经历的刺激序列中的熵,即信息增益的度量,是预测任务中选择行为的主要决定因素。由此,我们强调了无聊在驱动行为反应方面的重要性,这些反应确保了大脑持续获得信息流。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/b31199dad736/41598_2022_6861_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/cc26d218f383/41598_2022_6861_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/fc97bf83d4ec/41598_2022_6861_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/62fbcc2f3ecd/41598_2022_6861_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/b5591cdb1f02/41598_2022_6861_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/b31199dad736/41598_2022_6861_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/cc26d218f383/41598_2022_6861_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/fc97bf83d4ec/41598_2022_6861_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/62fbcc2f3ecd/41598_2022_6861_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/b5591cdb1f02/41598_2022_6861_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16c4/8873446/b31199dad736/41598_2022_6861_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Experienced entropy drives choice behavior in a boring decision-making task.经验熵驱动无聊决策任务中的选择行为。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 24;12(1):3162. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06861-w.
2
Driver state examination--Treading new paths.驾驶员状态检测——开拓新路径。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jun;91:157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
3
Avoiding boredom: Caudate and insula activity reflects boredom-elicited purchase bias.避免无聊:尾状核和脑岛活动反映无聊引发的购买偏好。
Cortex. 2017 Jul;92:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
4
The stress of boredom and monotony: a consideration of the evidence.无聊与单调带来的压力:对证据的考量。
Psychosom Med. 1981 Apr;43(2):165-76. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198104000-00008.
5
Driving performance impairments due to hypovigilance on monotonous roads.单调道路上因警觉性降低导致的驾驶表现受损。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Nov;43(6):2037-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.023. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
6
The antecedents, experience, and coping strategies of driver boredom in young adult males.年轻成年男性驾驶员无聊情绪的前因、经历及应对策略。
J Safety Res. 2016 Dec;59:69-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
Behavioral and electroencephalographic evidence for reduced attentional control and performance monitoring in boredom.无聊状态下注意力控制和表现监测能力降低的行为和脑电图证据。
Psychophysiology. 2021 Jun;58(6):e13816. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13816. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
8
Confirmation Bias through Selective Overweighting of Choice-Consistent Evidence.选择性重视与选择一致的证据导致确认偏误。
Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 8;28(19):3128-3135.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.052. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
Too hard, too easy, or just right? The effects of context on effort and boredom aversion.太难、太易还是刚刚好?情境对努力和厌烦规避的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2801-2810. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02528-x. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
10
Does the Superior Colliculus Control Perceptual Sensitivity or Choice Bias during Attention? Evidence from a Multialternative Decision Framework.上丘在注意力过程中控制知觉敏感性还是选择偏差?来自多选项决策框架的证据。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 18;37(3):480-511. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4505-14.2017.

引用本文的文献

1
A reduced perception of sensory information is linked with elevated boredom in people with and without attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.在患有和未患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的人群中,对感觉信息的感知减少与无聊感增加有关。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Mar 24;3(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00233-6.
2
Boredom signals deviation from a cognitive homeostatic set point.无聊表明偏离了认知稳态设定点。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Feb 10;3(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00209-6.
3
Boredom and curiosity: the hunger and the appetite for information.无聊与好奇:对信息的渴望与欲求。

本文引用的文献

1
Boredom proneness is associated with noisy decision-making, not risk-taking.无聊倾向与决策时的嘈杂状态有关,而非与冒险行为有关。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jun;239(6):1807-1825. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06098-5. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Behavioral and electroencephalographic evidence for reduced attentional control and performance monitoring in boredom.无聊状态下注意力控制和表现监测能力降低的行为和脑电图证据。
Psychophysiology. 2021 Jun;58(6):e13816. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13816. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
3
Rich environments, dull experiences: how environment can exacerbate the effect of constraint on the experience of boredom.
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 11;15:1514348. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1514348. eCollection 2024.
4
Validation of a German version of the Boredom Proneness Scale and the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale.德语版无聊倾向量表和多维状态无聊量表的验证
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 5;14(1):2905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53236-4.
5
The effect of short-form video addiction on undergraduates' academic procrastination: a moderated mediation model.短视频成瘾对大学生学业拖延的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1298361. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1298361. eCollection 2023.
6
Modeling fashion as an emergent collective behavior of bored individuals.将时尚建模为无聊的个体的一种新兴集体行为。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47749-7.
7
High state boredom vastly affects psychiatric inpatients and predicts their treatment duration.高度无聊状态极大地影响精神科住院患者,并预测他们的治疗持续时间。
Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 16;13(1):350. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02650-9.
8
The Role of Thermodynamic and Informational Entropy in Improving Real Estate Valuation Methods.热力学熵和信息熵在改进房地产估值方法中的作用。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jun 7;25(6):907. doi: 10.3390/e25060907.
丰富的环境,枯燥的体验:环境如何加剧约束对无聊体验的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Nov;34(7):1517-1523. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1763919. Epub 2020 May 13.
4
Levels of Proneness to Boredom in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder On and Off Methylphenidate Treatment.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童在服用和停服哌甲酯治疗时的无聊易感性水平。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2020 Apr;30(3):173-176. doi: 10.1089/cap.2019.0151. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
5
Emotion regulation difficulties and impaired working memory interact to predict boredom emotional eating.情绪调节困难和工作记忆受损相互作用,预测无聊情绪性进食。
Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104450. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104450. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
6
Cortical recruitment determines learning dynamics and strategy.皮质募集决定学习动态和策略。
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 1;10(1):1479. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09450-0.
7
Family functioning, moods, and binge eating among urban adolescents.城市青少年的家庭功能、情绪和暴食行为。
J Behav Med. 2019 Jun;42(3):511-521. doi: 10.1007/s10865-018-9994-8. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
8
The state of boredom: Frustrating or depressing?无聊状态:令人沮丧还是压抑?
Motiv Emot. 2018;42(6):931-946. doi: 10.1007/s11031-018-9710-6. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
9
Boring thoughts and bored minds: The MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement.无聊想法和无聊的头脑:无聊和认知参与的 MAC 模型。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Oct;125(5):689-713. doi: 10.1037/rev0000097. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
10
Are online poker problem gamblers sensation seekers?网络扑克问题赌徒是否是寻求刺激者?
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jun;264:310-315. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Mar 31.