Suppr超能文献

与环式或虎钳式器械相比,使用螺纹耦合股骨取出装置可产生更大的取出力;盆栽柄分析。

Use of a threaded-coupled femoral extraction device allows for higher extraction force when compared to loop or vice grip devices; A potted stem analysis.

作者信息

Phen Huai Ming, Godfrey William Strawn, Edwards Karlee, Thompson Daniel, Bradbury Thomas L

机构信息

Emory Orthopaedics and Spine Center, 59 Executive Park S, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Feb 1;26:101789. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101789. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extraction of a well-fixed femoral stem during revision total hip arthroplasty presents a technical challenge to the operating surgeon. The option of several stem designs during implantation necessitates the availability of extraction tools to be utilised intra-operatively. This study aims to compare the amount of axial force generated from using a threaded-coupled extraction device, loop extraction device, and vice-grip universal extraction set on a potted total hip arthroplasty stem construct.

METHODS

A size 7 Stryker Accolade® II femoral stem (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) was potted within a 5.20 cm inner diameter polyvinyl chloride pipe using a potting medium with tensile strength and lap shear of 1000psi. This construct was coupled to a material testing system whose force transducer was calibrated to a recording speed of 1000 frames per second. The extractors were coupled to the potted stem, and a force of 1.32 J was applied ten times sequentially to each construct. Force was recorded in Newtons.

RESULTS

The maximum average force for the threaded, loop, and Shukla extractors was 111.46 ± 1.77 N, 90.22 ± 0.87 N, and 64.70 ± 9.03 N (p < 0.01). Loss of coupling was not experienced with any extractor.

CONCLUSION

Within our study, the forces observed per constant load when utilising a threaded-coupled extraction device that attaches to the shoulder of the implant were significantly higher than those seen when using an extraction device that couples to the neck of the femoral stem.

摘要

背景

在翻修全髋关节置换术中取出固定良好的股骨柄对手术医生来说是一项技术挑战。植入过程中有多种柄设计可供选择,这就需要术中能使用取出工具。本研究旨在比较在盆栽全髋关节置换柄结构上使用螺纹连接取出装置、环形取出装置和虎钳式通用取出套件所产生的轴向力大小。

方法

使用抗拉强度和搭接剪切强度为1000psi的灌封介质,将一个7号史赛克Accolade® II股骨柄(史赛克公司,美国新泽西州马哈瓦)灌封在一个内径为5.20厘米的聚氯乙烯管内。该结构与一个材料测试系统相连,其力传感器被校准为每秒1000帧的记录速度。将取出器连接到灌封好的柄上,对每个结构依次施加1.32焦耳的力,共十次。力以牛顿为单位记录。

结果

螺纹取出器、环形取出器和舒克拉取出器的最大平均力分别为111.46 ± 1.77牛、90.22 ± 0.87牛和64.70 ± 9.03牛(p < 0.01)。所有取出器均未出现连接松动的情况。

结论

在我们的研究中,使用连接到植入物肩部的螺纹连接取出装置时,在恒定负荷下观察到的力显著高于使用连接到股骨柄颈部的取出装置时所观察到的力。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Removal of well-fixed fixed femoral stems.取出固定良好的股骨柄。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Feb;102(1 Suppl):S177-87. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.029. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
9
Removal of a well-fixed cementless femoral stem using a microsagittal saw.
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Jun;18(4):511-2. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00024-x.
10
Controlled femoral fracture: easy in.控制性股骨骨折:置入简便。
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr;18(3 Suppl 1):91-3. doi: 10.1054/arth.2003.50074.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验