Al-Sawat Abdullah, Mun Ji Yeon, Yoon Sung Hoon, Lee Chul Seung
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, South Korea.
Front Surg. 2022 Feb 8;9:813738. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.813738. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of wet gauze and conventional irrigation after laparoscopic appendectomy to determine whether wet gauze irrigation can help reduce surgical site infection (SSI).
A total of 308 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy were included in this study between December 2018 and May 2020. Of these, 132 (42.9%) received gauze irrigation (group 1), and 176 patients (57.1%) received conventional irrigation (group 2). Pre-operative outcomes and complications, including SSI, were compared after propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for baseline differences and selection bias.
After 1:1 PSM, 92 well-matched patients in each group were evaluated. Regarding perioperative outcomes between groups 1 and 2, the rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification grades III, IV, and V), operative time, and readmission rate did not differ between the groups. Superficial/deep SSIs were observed more frequently in group 2 (8/92 cases) than in group 1 (1/92 cases; = 0.017). The organ/space SSIs rate was not significantly different between the two groups (1/92 group 1 and 0/92 group 2, = 0.316). However, post-operative hospital stay was significantly longer in group 2 (2.8 ± 1.3 days) than in group 1 (1.6 ± 1.2 days; < 0.001). In the univariate analyses, wound irrigation using wet gauze was an independent protective factor for superficial or deep SSI ( = 0.044).
Wound irrigation using wet gauze after fascia closure has a significant beneficial effect on reducing post-operative superficial/deep SSI following laparoscopic appendectomy.
本研究旨在比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术后湿纱布与传统冲洗的围手术期结局,以确定湿纱布冲洗是否有助于降低手术部位感染(SSI)。
2018年12月至2020年5月期间,共有308例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者纳入本研究。其中,132例(42.9%)接受纱布冲洗(第1组),176例患者(57.1%)接受传统冲洗(第2组)。在倾向评分匹配(PSM)后比较术前结局和并发症,包括SSI,以调整基线差异和选择偏倚。
经过1:1 PSM后,每组评估了92例匹配良好的患者。关于第1组和第2组之间的围手术期结局,两组之间严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo分类III、IV和V级)发生率、手术时间和再入院率无差异。第2组(8/92例)比第1组(1/92例;P = 0.017)更频繁地观察到浅表/深部SSI。两组之间器官/腔隙SSI发生率无显著差异(第1组1/92例,第2组0/92例,P = 0.316)。然而,第2组术后住院时间(2.8±1.3天)明显长于第1组(1.6±1.2天;P<0.001)。在单因素分析中,使用湿纱布进行伤口冲洗是浅表或深部SSI的独立保护因素(P = 0.044)。
筋膜关闭后使用湿纱布进行伤口冲洗对降低腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的术后浅表/深部SSI具有显著有益效果。